On Sun, Jul 5, 2020 at 12:22 PM, Jake Montgomery wrote:
> I understand Ian's position of wait and see. But for completeness, I will
> point out that this new 'ambiguity' is different from the current cases
> where there would be a "collision
> between a variable name and a type name." As far as
I understand Ian's position of wait and see. But for completeness, I will
point out that this new 'ambiguity' is different from the current cases
where there would be a "collision
between a variable name and a type name." As far as I can tell, any such
collision in Go 1 would fail to compile.
On Sun, Jun 28, 2020 at 2:56 PM wrote:
>
> After looking at the latest proposal -
> https://go.googlesource.com/proposal/+/refs/heads/master/design/go2draft-type-parameters.md,
> and also checked a curated list of discussion at -
>
