Re: [go-nuts] Go 1.7 is released

"Trust, but verify"? No, that's been used and it didn't turn out so well. On Wed, 2016-08-17 at 08:10 +, Michael Banzon wrote: > "No test, no trust"? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop

Re: [go-nuts] Go 1.7 is released

"No test, no trust"? On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 1:17 AM Brad Fitzpatrick wrote: > We a phrase as catchy as "Pics or it didn't happen" for this. "Test or > it's not trustworthy"? Needs work. > > > On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 2:16 PM, Dave Cheney wrote: > >> Until

Re: [go-nuts] Go 1.7 is released

We a phrase as catchy as "Pics or it didn't happen" for this. "Test or it's not trustworthy"? Needs work. On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 2:16 PM, Dave Cheney wrote: > Until it's part of the ./all.bash test suite, it'll continue to break > because it has never been proven to work. > >

Re: [go-nuts] Go 1.7 is released

Until it's part of the ./all.bash test suite, it'll continue to break because it has never been proven to work. > On 17 Aug 2016, at 05:13, Michael Hudson-Doyle > wrote: > >> On 17 August 2016 at 08:31, Dave Cheney wrote: >> Stripping go

Re: [go-nuts] Go 1.7 is released

On 17 August 2016 at 08:31, Dave Cheney wrote: > Stripping go binaries is not tested and known to produce broken binaries. Stripping should be fine, and any problems produced by it should be reported as bugs. Please. > I recommend not doing this until strip/upx/whatever are

Re: [go-nuts] Go 1.7 is released

Stripping go binaries is not tested and known to produce broken binaries. I recommend not doing this until strip/upx/whatever are tested as part of the unit tests which are run before each commit lands. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts"

Re: [go-nuts] Go 1.7 is released

PSA: If anyone uses upx to shrink linux binaries, beware that it will now produce a binary that segfaults immediately. On Tuesday, August 16, 2016 at 7:50:22 AM UTC-4, bep wrote: > > Congrats! Good stuff! > > I wrote the benchmark below to compare two branches in Hugo, but ran a set > after

Re: [go-nuts] Go 1.7 is released

Congrats! Good stuff! I wrote the benchmark below to compare two branches in Hugo, but ran a set after 1.7 upgrade: 4 random but fairly big Hugo sites, each built 6 times, rendered to memory: - go1.6.2 0.17-DEV 24.479727984s - All OK - go1.6.2 0.17-MULTILINGUAL 26.49965009s - All OK -

Re: [go-nuts] Go 1.7 is released

Thanks, it has been added here: https://golang.org/project/ On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 5:25 PM, chai2010 wrote: > and http://127.0.0.1:6060/project/ #release history page have no Go1.7 > release notes. > > 2016-08-16 8:20 GMT+08:00 Chris Broadfoot : > >>

Re: [go-nuts] Go 1.7 is released

and http://127.0.0.1:6060/project/ #release history page have no Go1.7 release notes. 2016-08-16 8:20 GMT+08:00 Chris Broadfoot : > Thanks for flagging it. I'm re-building the zip file and it should be > available at golang.org/dl soon. > > On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 5:03 PM,

Re: [go-nuts] Go 1.7 is released

go1.7.windows-amd64.zip missing. 2016-08-16 7:28 GMT+08:00 Chris Broadfoot : > Hello gophers, > > We just released Go 1.7. > > You can read the announcement blog post here: > https://blog.golang.org/go1.7 > > You can download binary and source distributions from our download

[go-nuts] Go 1.7 is released

Hello gophers, We just released Go 1.7. You can read the announcement blog post here: https://blog.golang.org/go1.7 You can download binary and source distributions from our download page: https://golang.org/dl/ To compile from source using a Git checkout, update to the release with "git