RKI23w,
>> but runs only on windows (kind of).
>>
>> *What have I done...*
>>
>> + Egon
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From: *<golan...@googlegroups.com> on behalf of Egon <egon...@gmail.com
>>> >
>>> *Date:
*<golan...@googlegroups.com> on behalf of Egon <egon...@gmail.com>
>> *Date: *Monday, July 18, 2016 at 1:32 AM
>> *To: *golang-nuts <golan...@googlegroups.com>
>> *Cc: *<ondrej...@gmail.com>
>> *Subject: *[go-nuts] Re: An efficient runtime expression e
<golan...@googlegroups.com >
> *Cc: *<ondrej...@gmail.com >
> *Subject: *[go-nuts] Re: An efficient runtime expression evaluation
>
>
>
>
>
> On Monday, 18 July 2016 11:13:08 UTC+3, Egon wrote:
>
>
>
> On Monday, 18 July 2016 10:30:14 UTC+3, Ego
8, 2016 at 1:32 AM
To: golang-nuts <golang-nuts@googlegroups.com>
Cc: <ondrej.ko...@gmail.com>
Subject: [go-nuts] Re: An efficient runtime expression evaluation
On Monday, 18 July 2016 11:13:08 UTC+3, Egon wrote:
On Monday, 18 July 2016 10:30:14 UTC+3, Egon wrote:
On Monday, 1
On Monday, 18 July 2016 11:13:08 UTC+3, Egon wrote:
>
>
>
> On Monday, 18 July 2016 10:30:14 UTC+3, Egon wrote:
>>
>> On Monday, 18 July 2016 03:11:29 UTC+3, ondrej...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>
>>> Cheers, I tried replicating my endeavours (
>>> https://play.golang.org/p/Qxoo2ASac6), sorry if it's
PS: you may want to research and learn how Forth interpreters are
implemented, they have similar problems.
On Monday, 18 July 2016 10:30:14 UTC+3, Egon wrote:
>
> On Monday, 18 July 2016 03:11:29 UTC+3, ondrej...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>> Cheers, I tried replicating my endeavours (
>>
Cheers, I tried replicating my endeavours
(https://play.golang.org/p/Qxoo2ASac6), sorry if it's still too verbose.
It's essentially rewriting the inbuilt ast.Node into a simpler nested
struct and then walking it.
In testing the performance, I started adding algebraic expressions, which
make
