What about golang.org/x/graphics/vector ?
On Wed, 15 Aug 2018 at 20:05, Robert Johnstone
wrote:
> Agreed. image/vector would be better, but it would conflict with the
> existing golang.org/x/image/vector
>
>
> On Tuesday, 14 August 2018 18:45:58 UTC-4, George Moschovitis wrote:
>>
>> A general
Agreed. image/vector would be better, but it would conflict with the
existing golang.org/x/image/vector
On Tuesday, 14 August 2018 18:45:58 UTC-4, George Moschovitis wrote:
>
> A general interface would be extremely useful (at least to me ;-).
> I am not sure about the postscript-based API (I
>
> inspired from the canvas html5 API.
>
That's another option, but maybe it's optimized for raster-graphics rather
than vector graphics?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving
FYI (and IIRC), the vg package from (now) gonum/plot is actually inspired
from the canvas html5 API.
-s
sent from my droid
On Wed, Aug 15, 2018, 00:45 wrote:
> A general interface would be extremely useful (at least to me ;-).
> I am not sure about the postscript-based API (I am not against
A general interface would be extremely useful (at least to me ;-).
I am not sure about the postscript-based API (I am not against it though)
and I find the the name `image/gc` a bit confusing (vector <-> image, gc ~
garbage-collector).
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to
