For your question, the answer is NO. Your version is the most simple one.
If it is relating to making it meaningful or more documented, you can try
something like:
//checkDirection returns the direction for the key pressed: 'up', 'down',
'left', 'right'. Any other return variable (nil) will not
On Wed, May 1, 2019 at 7:28 PM wrote:
> if rl.IsKeyDown(rl.KeyA) { p.Rect.X-- }
> if rl.IsKeyDown(rl.KeyD) { p.Rect.X++ }
> if rl.IsKeyDown(rl.KeyW) { p.Rect.Y-- }
> if rl.IsKeyDown(rl.KeyS) { p.Rect.Y++ }
>
It's worth mentioning though that this will not survive a gofmt.
In general, I've found
if rl.IsKeyDown(rl.KeyA) { p.Rect.X-- }
if rl.IsKeyDown(rl.KeyD) { p.Rect.X++ }
if rl.IsKeyDown(rl.KeyW) { p.Rect.Y-- }
if rl.IsKeyDown(rl.KeyS) { p.Rect.Y++ }
On Wednesday, May 1, 2019 at 8:38:10 PM UTC+8, гусь wrote:
>
> if rl.IsKeyDown(rl.KeyA) {
> p.Rect.X -= 1
> }
> if rl.IsKeyDown(rl.KeyD)
I misread the ternary expression. I saw 1:0 as 1.0. Stupid getting old.
On Wednesday, May 1, 2019 at 5:47:44 PM UTC-7, mrpou...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wednesday, May 1, 2019 at 1:32:01 PM UTC-7, lgo...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>> Great example of why future Go updates should include the ternary
>
On Wednesday, May 1, 2019 at 1:32:01 PM UTC-7, lgo...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> Great example of why future Go updates should include the ternary operator.
> Your code is mess-ey when written using keywords 'if' or 'switch'
> but using '?' it becomes much cleaner
>
> p.Rect.X += rl.IsKeyDown(rl.KeyA
Two slightly different version for what is is worth (not much):
checkKey:=func(k int) int {
if rl.IsKeyDown(k) {
return 1
}
return 0
}
p.Rect.X+=-checkKey(rl.KeyA)+checkKey(rl.KeyD)
p.Rect.Y+=-checkKey(rl.KeyW)+checkKey(,rl.KeyS)
or
checkKey:=func(m,p int) (i int) {
if rl.IsKeyDown(
On Wed, May 1, 2019 at 2:31 PM wrote:
>
> Great example of why future Go updates should include the ternary operator.
> Your code is mess-ey when written using keywords 'if' or 'switch'
> but using '?' it becomes much cleaner
>
> p.Rect.X += rl.IsKeyDown(rl.KeyA) ? -1:0 + (rl.IsKeyDown(rl.Key
Great example of why future Go updates should include the ternary operator.
Your code is mess-ey when written using keywords 'if' or 'switch'
but using '?' it becomes much cleaner
p.Rect.X += rl.IsKeyDown(rl.KeyA) ? -1:0 + (rl.IsKeyDown(rl.KeyD) ? 1 :
0 )
p.Rect.Y += rl.IsKeyDown(rl.KeyW)
