see also:
https://go.dev/issues/19642
https://go.dev//issues/21182
- sean
On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 3:10 PM Nick Craig-Wood wrote:
> Ah ha! I thought there would be a related issue I couldn't find :-)
>
> `zero` would remove most of the pain though IMHO `_` looks neater in the
> return
Ah ha! I thought there would be a related issue I couldn't find :-)
`zero` would remove most of the pain though IMHO `_` looks neater in the
return statements!
Thanks for the pointer Brian.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"golang-nuts" group.
To
Something similar is in the pipeline:
https://github.com/golang/go/issues/61372
When implemented, it will be spelled "zero" rather than "_"
As I understand it, you'll still need to say 0, "" or nil where those are
available for the type in question. Therefore in the f1() example you gave,
