Re: [go-nuts] Re: awesome-go project on golang github organization

2017-10-25 Thread Tyler Compton
It may not be a good idea to put the burden of awesome-go on the Go team, since it's been pointed out in the past that they don't have extra cycles. I suspect that's still the case. On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 4:08 PM Dan Kortschak wrote: > I have similar sentiments. > > On Tue, 2017-10-24 at 09:19

Re: [go-nuts] Re: awesome-go project on golang github organization

2017-10-24 Thread Dan Kortschak
I have similar sentiments. On Tue, 2017-10-24 at 09:19 -0700, prades.m...@gmail.com wrote: > I submitted several original projects i made to your list, they > passed all  > the tests, they sat in the pull-request list for 6 month then when > rejected  > for disingenuous or unspecified reasons.So I

[go-nuts] Re: awesome-go project on golang github organization

2017-10-24 Thread prades . marq
I submitted several original projects i made to your list, they passed all the tests, they sat in the pull-request list for 6 month then when rejected for disingenuous or unspecified reasons.So I would prefer not your list becomes the official one. Le lundi 23 octobre 2017 17:20:00 UTC+2, Thiag