Re: [go-nuts] Re: lambda syntax

[Tyler Compton]

It's usually best to create a new thread instead of responding to one
that's so old (more than three years in this case).

On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 6:28 AM  wrote:

> I don't know how you can live without Generics but you can't live without
> Lambda expression. No Go Authors will not listen to anyone.
> If I could(because of the project I am working on) I would never use a
> language like Go and would never look back. There are much better choices
> out there.
>
> On Wednesday, February 5, 2014 at 1:10:35 PM UTC-5, Felix wrote:
>>
>> Go as a language made a choice to leave certain things out, because
>> there is other ways to solve them, I live without generics and am happy,
>> no while loop no problem and etc.
>>
>> But am hoping that the entire Go community + Go team + who ever it may
>> concern
>> that we all accept that we need a lambda syntax,
>>
>> ---
>>
>> (input parameters) => expression
>>
>> ---
>>
>> (x, y) => x == y
>>
>> ---
>>
>> () => SomeMethod()
>>
>> ---
>>
>> this will really help with things like
>> implementing linq like in go check
>> https://github.com/ahmetalpbalkan/go-linq
>> (
>> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topicsearchin/golang-nuts/lambda%7Csort:date%7Cspell:true/golang-nuts/L-kxltsynh0
>> )
>>
>> Am looking at the lambda expression from C#
>> http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb397687.aspx
>> this will make functional things nice in Go
>>
>> implementing a map over a slice like
>>
>> arr := []int{2, 3, 4}
>> map(x => x * 2, arr)
>>
>> simpler that
>> map(func(x int){ x * 2}, arr)
>>
>> So please Command Pike don't tell me no :-)
>>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "golang-nuts" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

[go-nuts] Re: lambda syntax

[kamyarm]

I don't know how you can live without Generics but you can't live without 
Lambda expression. No Go Authors will not listen to anyone. 
If I could(because of the project I am working on) I would never use a 
language like Go and would never look back. There are much better choices 
out there.

On Wednesday, February 5, 2014 at 1:10:35 PM UTC-5, Felix wrote:
>
> Go as a language made a choice to leave certain things out, because
> there is other ways to solve them, I live without generics and am happy,
> no while loop no problem and etc.
>
> But am hoping that the entire Go community + Go team + who ever it may 
> concern
> that we all accept that we need a lambda syntax,
>
> ---
>
> (input parameters) => expression
>
> ---
>
> (x, y) => x == y
>
> ---
>
> () => SomeMethod()
>
> ---
>
> this will really help with things like
> implementing linq like in go check 
> https://github.com/ahmetalpbalkan/go-linq 
> ( 
> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topicsearchin/golang-nuts/lambda%7Csort:date%7Cspell:true/golang-nuts/L-kxltsynh0
>  
> )
>
> Am looking at the lambda expression from C# 
> http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb397687.aspx
> this will make functional things nice in Go
>
> implementing a map over a slice like 
>
> arr := []int{2, 3, 4}
> map(x => x * 2, arr)
>
> simpler that
> map(func(x int){ x * 2}, arr)
>
> So please Command Pike don't tell me no :-)
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.