On Thursday, 9 January 2020 08:38:56 UTC, T L wrote:
>
> Yes, when I change the "go 1.13" directive to "go 1.14", it suggests I
> need to run 'go mod vendor' to sync.
> After the sync, it works. Thanks for the help.
>
> So if the directive is 1.13, no default "-mod=vendor" compiler flag is
>
Yes, when I change the "go 1.13" directive to "go 1.14", it suggests I need
to run 'go mod vendor' to sync.
After the sync, it works. Thanks for the help.
So if the directive is 1.13, no default "-mod=vendor" compiler flag is set?
And not any message is suggested?
On Wednesday, January 8, 2020
I'm a totally blind developer who is trying to learn go. When running
go tool cover -html=cover.out -o cover.html
It appears the HTML generated uses color to show the lines of code that are
not covered without any other way of identifying uncovered lines. This is
obviously an issue if your
I have one exe file which contains code written in the Go language. I don’t
have a source code for this. Is there a tool or technique by which I can
determine the code Coverage for this executable. I will trigger my test
cases by using this exe.
--
You received this message because you are
I saw `go tool cover` does it, but I don't see anything else but a simple
call to printer.Fprint(w, f.fset, f.astFile) at
https://github.com/golang/tools/blob/master/cmd/cover/cover.go#L384
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"golang-nuts" group.
To
On Thu, Jan 9, 2020, at 08:50, jared.stoff...@gmail.com wrote:
> I'm a totally blind developer who is trying to learn go. When running
>
> go tool cover -html=cover.out -o cover.html
>
> It appears the HTML generated uses color to show the lines of code
> that are not covered without any other way
Looking at the crypto/tls package, it looks like there's no way to use an
externally generated symmetric key, rather the masterSecret is generated
internally and is not exposed to the user. Why is this the case? If a user
wants to use their own key-generation to supply the TLS session's
On Thursday, January 9, 2020 at 3:38:56 AM UTC-5, T L wrote:
>
> Yes, when I change the "go 1.13" directive to "go 1.14", it suggests I
> need to run 'go mod vendor' to sync.
> After the sync, it works. Thanks for the help.
>
> So if the directive is 1.13, no default "-mod=vendor" compiler flag
I have some doubts about the usefulness of Server.ConnContext, given that
it exposes the underlying network connection.
IMHO, the only things that can be obtained by net.Conn are the local
address (already in LocalAddrContextKey) and the remote address and the TLS
info (already in Request).
Hello,
I am looking for a way to keep to original token positioning but I cannot
find how to avoid it when using `go/printer` or `go/format`.
Basically, how to make this example print the same string that was parsed:
https://play.golang.org/p/dI7WcevQJAZ
Thanks for your help!
Julio
--
You
Those are good guidelines. I'd like to add a couple of nuances.
For “system” or “operations” errors (we have a database engine that
executes in the address space of processes, so there can be errors such as
an IO error or an inability to expand because of insufficient space in the
file
On Tuesday, January 7, 2020 at 12:47:28 AM UTC-7, Axel Wagner wrote:
>
> Thus, panics are the right tool to use when reporting an issue that
> requires programmer attention and errors are the right tool when reporting
> an issue that requires user-attention (or, of course, can be handled
>
Hello gophers,
We have just released Go versions 1.13.6 and 1.12.15, minor point releases.
These releases include fixes to the runtime and to the
net/http package.
The macOS releases enable the Hardened Runtime.
Seehttps://golang.org/issue/34986 for details.
View the release notes for more
Hi,
tl;dr Are there any existing end-to-end testing libraries for CLI
applications? Specifically, what I'm looking for is a library that makes it
easy to test that "running this command should produce this output" without
fear that a buggy application could corrupt the filesystem.
Background:
On Thursday, 9 January 2020 16:39:40 UTC+1, rk303...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> I have one exe file which contains code written in the Go language. I
> don’t have a source code for this. Is there a tool or technique by which I
> can determine the code Coverage for this executable [?]
>
No, for
15 matches
Mail list logo
