Hi all,
I work at FireEye on the tooling end of things, and my team needs more decent
senior backend devs. Our current project is a large-ish system in Go; we're
looking for experienced systems programmers, but deep proficiency in Go isn't
strictly required (Go is easy enough to pick up,
On Jan 20, 2019, at 18:00, 伊藤和也 wrote:
>
> I know "nil" is zero values for slices, maps, interfaces, etc but I don't
> know what "nil" implays. Does nil implay the absence of value or a variable
> has't been initialized yet or something else?
Basically yes, all of the above. This pattern
On Jan 20, 2019, at 16:36, Burak Serdar wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Jan 20, 2019 at 2:32 PM 伊藤和也 wrote:
>>
>> type a interface{
>> m()
>> }
>>
>> type abc int
>> func (abc) m() {}
>>
>> func main() {
>> var v a
>> v.m()
>^^
>
> v is nil. It is declared but never assigned a value. You
Ah! No, that is not possible, because interfaces (and other types) are not
first-class objects in Go like they are in some other languages (such as
Python). You can work around it, to some extent, by passing a zero-valued
instance of such an interface (e.g. PrintInterface(A{})) and using some
Oh man, I searched in vain for any kind of discussion exactly like that issue.
Your Google-fu is clearly superior to mine. Thanks! :-)
> On Dec 14, 2018, at 10:08 AM, Paul Jolly wrote:
>
> Just to briefly note the discussion in
> https://github.com/golang/go/issues/27858 (and other issues
Hi all,
We're building with go 1.10.x and dep for a project at work, and having been
bitten twice in the space of a week with unversioned upstream executables
fetched via "go get" causing strife with versioned vendor code fetched by
"dep", we've been working on making our build environment
On Apr 3, 2019, at 11:34 AM, Shyaka Rene wrote:
>
>
> Hello.
> I'm new to go, i'm looking for a programming language to replace java. I have
> simple questions
> • is it a good idea to deploy go in cloud server if go is compiled to
> machine binaries, what can happen if the cloud
A few things. Responses inline.
> On Apr 3, 2019, at 7:05 AM, Marcus Franke wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I have a small project here at work, that does not compile using modules
> inside the golang docker image.
>
> The software resides inside a rather monorepo like repository inside the
>
Was this book written in the '70s or '80s?
Single-pass compilation is great in some ways (memory and time efficient), not
in others (usability). C is (sort of) single-pass (if you don't count the
preprocessor, optimization passes, etc), which is why you need function
prototypes. Assemblers
Hi all,
We're running into a bit of an interesting problem with modules. A month or
two ago, we finally converted our project over to using modules, partly because
it was The Right Thing To Do and partly because Artifactory supports module
repositories (but not dep).
The process hasn't
On Mar 12, 2019, at 7:44 AM, Wojciech S. Czarnecki wrote:
>
> On Mon, 11 Mar 2019 23:13:00 -0700 (PDT)
> Lucio wrote:
>
>> It's clearly become a lot easier
>
> An that is the crux of the problem.
>
> It is so easy that it easily turns off the brain and suppress
> the last faint of thought
Yes, but we have somewhat different objectives than you might.
We use the Docker golang (alpine) image to build our images, and it works
wonderfully (and really makes it a lot easier to cope with differences in
Jenkins build nodes). However, our apps generally eventually run on
Kubernetes,
I suspect it's because your reference to the time_array is actually copying it
into your closure that's running as the goroutine instead of making a reference
to it. You might do better to pass that array as a parameter to the goroutine
instead of trying to absorb it as context.
I should note
On Apr 15, 2019, at 12:47 PM, Miki Tebeka wrote:
>
> On Monday, April 15, 2019 at 2:12:18 PM UTC+3, Jan Mercl wrote:
>
> 1.1*1.1 and 1.21 are untyped constants and have much higher precision at
> which they are not equal.
> Does that mean that the Go compiler is using floats with more
On Apr 16, 2019, at 2:29 AM, Miki Tebeka wrote:
>>
>> On Monday, April 15, 2019 at 7:59:28 PM UTC+3, David Riley wrote:
>> On Apr 15, 2019, at 12:47 PM, Miki Tebeka wrote:
>> >
>> > On Monday, April 15, 2019 at 2:12:18 PM UTC+3, Jan Mercl wrote:
>
Because Min and Max are very good and simple indicators of whether the
mechanism is generic enough to handle a fairly common idiom: small functions
for similarly behaved items, say comparable items, which are annoying and
repetitive to write for every data type which might support the operation
On May 30, 2019, at 2:25 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>
> One of my guidelines for an acceptable generics proposal is that
> people can write Min and Max. Your proposal admits that it doesn't
> permit that. I think that is a problem. I'm fine with the general
> idea of "do 80% of the job" but
On May 28, 2019, at 8:12 AM, Ashutosh Baghel wrote:
>
> Hello folks,
>
> I want to declare a few variables constant. But I guess there is nothing as
> "Constant" type in GoLang. How do I achieve this in GoLang?
https://tour.golang.org/basics/15
--
You received this message because you are
There are other JSON packages (jsoniter, gojay come to mind) which may do more
of what you want.
The standard library's JSON package is fine for simple things, but because it
relies on struct tagging, it's not terribly well suited for situations where
you want to separate the serialized
On Jun 11, 2019, at 13:38, Ronny Bangsund wrote:
>
>
>
>> On Tuesday, June 11, 2019 at 2:47:44 PM UTC+2, Boris Mühmer wrote:
>> Is the project layout total rubbish?
>
> I'm not sure - all I know is that it's different from how I prefer it, and
> "pkg" is the one thing I frequently see people
On May 18, 2019, at 05:59, ma...@madra.net wrote:
>
>> On Saturday, 18 May 2019 00:44:33 UTC+1, Rob 'Commander' Pike wrote:
>> jail is a clear improvement over the ludicrous gaol...
>
> I hadn't actually realised that GAOL vs JAIL was a British vs. US English
> distinction. I thought 'Gaol' was
On May 12, 2019, at 06:55, Jesper Louis Andersen
wrote:
>
> I don't think there are developers who find it unreadable once they know the
> logic of that operator. However, if you don't know the rules, then it looks
> like black magic.
>
> In large software developments, consistency beats
> On Apr 27, 2019, at 1:11 AM, Constantin Konstantinidis
> wrote:
>
> Your description seems to relate to this issue
> https://github.com/golang/go/issues/30667.
It does indeed! It would be great if there were also a way to prevent it from
trying to modify the cache, or at least to be less
On Apr 26, 2019, at 07:12, smn shilla wrote:
>
> Hi
> any luck please
Your request (“how to crack the Go application.exe”) is vague, and it is not
immediately clear that you’re asking for help that people here might be
comfortable giving.
If you’re interested in reverse engineering Go
On Apr 21, 2019, at 9:02 PM, icod.d...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> I don't know about you but for me, even if there wasn't so much going on,
> Google+ and the Go+ community was a source of info.
>
> Reddit is reddit, this whatever it is, is what it is, mewe can't replace
> G+.
> Facebook just
On Apr 24, 2019, at 8:04 AM, Mark Volkmann wrote:
>
>
>> On Apr 24, 2019, at 6:22 AM, Robert Engels wrote:
>>
>> Though to the ops point, not sure why Go doesn’t have the ternary operator -
>> which is pretty ubiquitous.
>
> The idea of adding the ternary operator to Go has been debated
On Apr 24, 2019, at 12:34 PM, Marcus Low wrote:
>
> On Wednesday, April 24, 2019 at 10:08:53 PM UTC+8, Mark Volkmann wrote:
>> Are there really developers that find this unreadable?
>>
>> color := temperature > 80 ? “red” : “green”
>>
>> I know what you are going to say. People will nest
> On Apr 23, 2019, at 12:52 PM, Darko Luketic wrote:
>
> But Twitter is a loose group of individuals, or does it have group
> functionality now? Everything is done via #channels last time I checked.
> I honestly very rarely use it, too small sized posts, it's very chaotic and
> stuff you've
On Apr 24, 2019, at 5:25 PM, andrey mirtchovski wrote:
>
>> I may easily misremember, but that doesn't match my recollection. I
>> don't remember what position Rob and Robert took, but as I recall Ken
>> was generally opposed to the ternary operator. He had been in part
>> responsible for
Hi all,
We have an unusual issue owing somewhat to Jenkins' rather odd (but
understandable) method of running things in containers. Jenkins, when it runs
things in Docker containers through its pipeline plugin, volume-mounts the
workspace directory at the same location as it is in the host
On Apr 26, 2019, at 2:12 AM, Mike Schinkel wrote:
>
> Given that, I am curious what your thoughts would be if this were possible in
> Go instead?
>
>color := if temperature > 80 then “red” else “green”
>
> And especially if this formatting were valid:
>
>color := if temperature >
This may be a controversial opinion on this list (maybe it's not, I don't
know), but I've never thought Go is a particularly good first language. It's
an *excellent* language, but I've always said the same thing about it as I did
about C/C++ and Java: there's just a touch too much arcana for
As does Armbian (armbian.com). I dare say they're my favorite ARM distribution
for getting stuff up and running on generic ARM boards; their default SD card
installs mostly Just Do The Right Thing (including automatically expanding the
filesystem on first boot to fit), and the hardware support
On Mar 2, 2020, at 1:54 PM, Warren Stephens wrote:
>
> I have never experienced that writing tests at the beginning saves time. I
> find it is always faster to not write them in the beginning. Functionality
> typically changes 3 or 4 times before it "settles down" enough that writing
>
On Mar 5, 2020, at 9:26 AM, Warren Stephens wrote:
>
> And I am saying Functions PLUS Structure.
>
>
>
> Functions remain. Visible structure is added.
Right, and you can do your testing at the boundaries of those functions,
because the structure is nothing but a shell (in most Step Lambda
On Mar 5, 2020, at 5:17 PM, Warren Stephens wrote:
>
> So I should invent a fractal programming language -- where every function
> must be defined within another function -- have people write tests for that!
I think we call that "LISP".
- Dave
--
You received this message because you are
On Feb 1, 2020, at 9:00 AM, Manlio Perillo wrote:
>
> On Saturday, February 1, 2020 at 12:45:23 AM UTC+1, David Riley wrote:
>> Please don't do this. Or make it an opt-in. This is not a good change to
>> force on users by default.
>>
>
> You are right, thank
On Jan 30, 2020, at 8:46 AM, Manlio Perillo wrote:
>
> Yes.
>
> In fact I wrote that alignment should be done by the editor, not gofmt.
In this scenario, the editor needs to understand Go formatting and apply
special formatting to tabs within struct fields? I strongly discourage this.
It
On Feb 18, 2020, at 9:15 PM, Wojciech S. Czarnecki wrote:
>
> [1] use marker relative to the opening brace hinting at the desired comment
> position, ie. compute type-start position relative to the opening brace then
> comment-start position relative to the marker from the comment of the brace
>
On Feb 20, 2020, at 8:35 AM, Manlio Perillo wrote:
>
> This is not a matter of style. It is a matter of having clean diffs in
> commits.
It is both.
You may prioritize clean diffs, and I understand your reasons for that. Many
other people prioritize readability over clean diffs. Neither
On Feb 7, 2020, at 7:24 AM, Everton Marques wrote:
>
> I think Go is way better than Rust, but it is amusing to see why people pick
> one over another.
I think they have very different use cases. Rust is fundamentally a functional
language, which suits it quite well for things functional
On Feb 13, 2020, at 1:45 PM, Robert Engels wrote:
>
> Swift uses GC - it uses a reference counting GC which has been proven to be
> inferior compared to tracing collectors - especially in concurrent
> environments. Not to mention cycles.
Worth noting, too, that Swift does this largely because
> On Feb 12, 2020, at 10:10 AM, Henrik Johansson wrote:
>
> Well, Cassandra has a rewrite in C++ ScyllaDB hat performs many times better
> so that particular example isn't really helping the GC case.
>
> I don't mind the GC myself but I hear the "GC is actually faster" often and
> it seems
I'll be interested to see how this trend goes when they FINALLY pull the plug
on Python 2.7 and everyone who's been kicking the can down the road for the
better part of a decade finally has to figure out which third-party libraries
are breaking.
Python is better for some things, Go better for
I strongly agree this would be beneficial. I’ve discussed this exact concept
with my employer before, because it’s an area we have scanners for with older
languages, but not Go.
I do believe Snyk offers a commercial version of this service, but a public,
official, well-vetted repository that
On Jan 7, 2020, at 04:44, Motaz Hejaze wrote:
>
>
> Thank you all guys for your help..
>
> May i ask what is the best deployment for more performance ??
I’m not quite sure what you mean. Do you mean what environment results in the
highest-performing Go programs? I’d imagine the s390x
I feel like it's 10.15 where Apple really started doubling down on their
"notarization" service? I haven't updated anything to it because it breaks (by
design) a number of things I regularly use, so it would be hard to say, but
that has to be frustrating for developers who can't be constantly
If you are already a programmer in another language, the Tour of Go
(tour.golang.org) is absolutely the best.
If you are not already a programmer in another language, I personally don't
recommend Go as a first language; it's an excellent language, but I feel that
people will do better with it
And since I'm a fan of lifelong learning, I have to admit to not having known
that println() was a builtin until this post. Thanks! That does un-complicate
it somewhat.
> On Mar 26, 2020, at 10:34 AM, Sebastien Binet wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 3:29 PM David Ril
s.google.com/d/topic/golang-nuts/FIRSDBehb3g/discussion
>
> Dan
>
>> On Wed, 2020-03-25 at 13:34 -0400, David Riley wrote:
>> If you are already a programmer in another language, the Tour of Go
>> (tour.golang.org) is absolutely the best.
>>
>> If you are n
This is actually a fairly neat solution! I might look at using that from here
on out.
How well does it work if something else (also with access to your private
repository) tries to include your module?
- Dave
> On Apr 1, 2020, at 11:47 AM, Dave Mazzoni wrote:
>
> With all the examples out
gt; I never really understood the rationale for the feature.
>
> The Go 1 compatibility promise is also helpful. This means that course
> materials or online code examples written
> 8 years ago will still work today. The python community broke most existing
> code whe
I like Echo (echo.labstack.com) a lot. Nice and modular, more capable than Gin
with about the same performance, and I think it meets all of your criteria
(except having never used Spring Boot before, I don't know how it compares).
- Dave
> On May 9, 2020, at 12:39 AM, Sai Matam wrote:
>
>
On Feb 26, 2020, at 2:00 PM, James Pettyjohn wrote:
>
> A little further digging shows that VZEROUPPER is part of the AVX instruction
> set, not supported on any Apple computers prior to 2011 from what I can tell.
>
> Given the rc1 code worked fine, that could be an alternative for Darwin
On Oct 20, 2020, at 2:38 AM, fge...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> After looking at the list of supported platforms on build.golang.org
> and looking at the golang-nuts and golang-dev mailing list archives, I
> can't see the ppc e500 as a supported hardware platform for the go
> compiler (available on
On Aug 21, 2020, at 00:56, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>
> No, the intent is that you would switch on the type parameter itself,
> not a value.
>
> func g[T C](v T) T {
> switch T {
>// the rest is the same
> }
> }
>
> Thanks for asking.
Oh, this clarifies my remaining murkiness about the
On Aug 20, 2020, at 20:27, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>
> 1.
>
> We’re going to settle on square brackets for the generics syntax.
> We’re going to drop the “type” keyword before type parameters, as
> using square brackets is sufficient to distinguish the type parameter
> list from the ordinary
On Oct 21, 2020, at 6:41 AM, Bill wrote:
>
> Hello,
> I created the sql to fetch all info in one call instead of multiple calls per
> each row.
>
> One thing I noticed about golang is that when I ping my Remote DB from
> localhost (running in vscode) I get ping -> 1.573826274s. So I think
On Jul 15, 2020, at 2:48 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>
> More seriously, though, let's look closely at Robert's example:
>
> a, b = w < x, y > (z)
TBH, I think a big argument in favor of square brackets over angle brackets is
that they ascend above the center line in most typefaces, which
On Aug 10, 2020, at 4:59 AM, Hugo Cornelis wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Bottom line: Docker works reliably on powerpc 440fpu 32 bit using gccgo as
> the compiler. We will likely soon start working on powerpc e6500 in 32bit
> mode.
>
> After a fix in the structures used by the epoll system calls,
> On Aug 5, 2020, at 5:16 AM, Amarjeet Anand
> wrote:
>
> How come the first git commit for Go was in 1972?
>
> Anybody want to share the story behind the first 4 commits of Go project by
> Brian Kernighan?
>
>
>
On Jul 14, 2020, at 5:54 PM, 'Robert Griesemer' via golang-nuts
wrote:
>
> But if we are comfortable with the extra type keyword, the ambiguity
> disappears:
>
> type A[type N] E
>
> (When we originally dismissed square brackets, the type keyword was not yet
> on the table.)
>
>
On Jul 15, 2020, at 4:47 AM, Nick Craig-Wood wrote:
>
> In my mind the use of [ ] clashes horribly with the array declaration
> syntax. When I see [int] in particular my brain says, ah array declaration of
> size int, what, no wait...
On the other hand, this is already how maps are declared
On Jul 15, 2020, at 12:13 AM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>
> The disadvantage of guillemets is that they are hard to type on many
> keyboards. So to me either square brackets or angle brackets would be
> better than guillemets.
Not to mention that, while Go *is* officially in UTF-8, the chance of
On Jul 10, 2020, at 3:02 PM, Alastair Neil wrote:
>
>
> It's an old but not an especially slow machine: dual 8 core E5-2670 Xeon
> with 64 GB Ram.
> I wil try
> GO_TEST_TIMEOUT_SCALE=4
I've successfully built on an older and slower (pre-Nehalem) 8-core Xeon with a
similar RAM load just
On Jul 12, 2020, at 10:17 AM, Harris Newman wrote:
>
> I'm writing a telnet server and have found several packages which provide
> telnet functionality, but can't find any telnet support in the standard
> library or other packages in the golang.org site.
>
> Is there a golang supported
On Jun 18, 2020, at 12:30 PM, 'Thomas Bushnell, BSG' via golang-nuts
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 9:46 AM Kiswono Prayogo wrote:
> Personally () parentheses seems like to be harder to read, too similar with
> function calls.
>
> This is exactly why I like it. These are parameters, and
On Jun 25, 2020, at 8:49 PM, chandrak13...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> Essentially based on the existing capacity, the assignment of one slice
> effects other slices. These are stemming from the underlying pointer
> arithmetic and seems inconsistent. Looks like programmer needs to know the
> history
> On Jun 26, 2020, at 2:52 PM, Tyler Compton wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 10:52 AM David Riley wrote:
>> Also, to this specific point: this exact approach, as with much of Go,
>> embodies the Bell Labs approach to design (for better or for worse, and with
>&g
On Jun 26, 2020, at 2:59 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>
> I honestly don't think that append is an example of worse-is-better.
> I think it's an example of preferring to pass and return values rather
> than pointers. The language could easily have made append take a
> pointer to a slice as its
On Jun 26, 2020, at 1:41 PM, Robert Engels wrote:
>
> My opinion is that if RTFM is required more than once for a core concept
> there may be a design problem. It clearly bites a lot of people. Slices are a
> higher level struct, as the underlying array is the same as Java, but Java
> doesn’t
On Jun 26, 2020, at 1:41 PM, Robert Engels wrote:
>
> I don’t think “how it works” is the confusion, more of “how to use it
> properly”
>
> My opinion is that if RTFM is required more than once for a core concept
> there may be a design problem. It clearly bites a lot of people. Slices are a
On Jun 27, 2020, at 8:30 AM, Robert Engels wrote:
>
> Just because the bulk of the time is in the decode doesn’t mean the decode is
> inefficient or can be improved upon. It might be the most expensive stage in
> the process regardless of the implementation.
This is I think the most
On Tuesday, June 16, 2020 at 11:52:10 AM UTC-4, K Richard Pixley wrote:
>
> There is agreement on the code of conduct. There is not agreement on the
> banner. IMO, the banner is out of line with the goals of this group and
> with the code of conduct. It's inappropriate. It needs to be
I think this probably gets a little closer to what you were going for, but
there's a puzzling error that leads me to think the parser doesn't quite
understand the instantiation in the return type:
https://go2goplay.golang.org/p/gcD609dr21E
type Foo(type T) struct {}
type
On Jun 17, 2020, at 8:45 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 9:35 AM wrote:
>>
>> How do I write a function that can take any container? Either a built in
>> container or a user defined structure? Java is awkward when deciding to
>> accept arrays or the List type — is go
On Jun 18, 2020, at 6:19 PM, Jon Conradt wrote:
>
> Ian, I like the direction being taken on Generics, and I am thankful the Go
> Team did not rush into an implementation.
>
> I'm not a huge fan of another set of ()'s and I agree with not wanting the
> overhead of overloading <>. That got me
> On Jun 26, 2020, at 9:28 AM, Robert Engels wrote:
>
>> On Jun 26, 2020, at 8:23 AM, David Riley wrote:
>>
>> You are correct, the programmer needs to read the manual. Slices are
>> "windows" into their underlying array, therefore assigning data into
On Jun 10, 2020, at 5:50 AM, Jesper Louis Andersen
wrote:
>
> 2. Dynamic binary translation from machine-code to machine-code has been used
> in the past for these architectural changes. While this carries a penalty, it
> also provides a short-term solution. The added efficiency of recompiles
On Jun 10, 2020, at 3:23 PM, David Riley wrote:
>
> Also worth noting that IBM i (f/k/a System i and AS/400) traditionally stores
> its executables as an IR form to be compiled to native code (currently PPC)
> on execution, though my recollection is that this is a one-
On Jul 15, 2020, at 4:59 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 5:44 AM Jan Mercl <0xj...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> My 2c - Alternative type parameters syntax (ab)using @$:
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1AoU23DcNxYX2vYT20V2K16Jzl7SP9taRRhIT8l_pZss/edit?usp=sharing
>
>
On Jul 22, 2020, at 8:02 PM, Russ Cox wrote:
>
> So it sounds like everyone is in favor of the entire generics proposal and
> all the semantics, and all we have left to hammer out is the bracket
> characters? Do I have that right?
We haven't covered what the bike shed roof is going to be made
On Jul 24, 2020, at 5:50 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 2:22 PM wrote:
> >
> > On 7/23/20, Michael Jones wrote:
> > ...
> > > Another delight is the uppercase signal for external.
> > >
> > > Maybe the “how to signal it” aspect of type instantiation could look to
> > >
Indeed. I'm working on a boolean logic package that has a number of different
bitfield oriented backends, all of which will have a lot of very needlessly
repetitive code without generics. If generics weren't coming "soon" I'd
consider writing a generator to build it, but generics are the much
On Oct 20, 2020, at 1:18 PM, Marcin Romaszewicz wrote:
>
> Go's database layer is generally pretty quick, I use it a lot, but your code
> immediately sets off my DB alarms, because you are doing queries within the
> body of another query loop, which means you're opening up lots of
>
This topic has shown little other than that a few people here are unwilling to
consider points of view other than their own and declare that very real
problems are not real.
You should listen to people who have been doing this much longer than you have
before discarding all their points as
On Dec 31, 2020, at 11:54 AM, 'Axel Wagner' via golang-nuts
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 31, 2020 at 5:46 PM robert engels wrote:
> I’ll state for the record again, I was originally very dismayed that Go did
> not offer generics - after developing with it for a while that is far less of
> an issue
On Jan 13, 2021, at 7:21 PM, Peter Wilson wrote:
> So, after a long ramble, given that I am happy to waste CPU time in busy
> waits (rather than have the overhead of scheduling blocked goroutines), what
> is the recommendation for the signalling mechanism when all is done in go and
>
This particular problem is akin to the way GPUs work; in GPU computing, you
generally marshal all your inputs into one buffer and have the outputs from a
single kernel written to an output buffer (obviously there can be more on
either side). The execution overhead of a single invocation is
On Jan 12, 2021, at 5:40 AM, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
>
> On 1/12/21 9:43 AM, Axel Wagner wrote:
>> git init
>> go mod init
>>
>> I guess you *could* safe the `git init` part, but is that really worth the
>> added
>> complexity?
>
>
> I usually init git from within vscode afterwards. I wonder
On Jun 22, 2021, at 12:42, Axel Wagner wrote:
>
>
> Oh and also:
>
>> Likewise, I think this only works for array literals; I don’t think (though
>> again have not tried it) that you can declare slice literals with only
>> selected members initialized.
>
> Works fine too:
On Jun 22, 2021, at 11:39, Vaibhav Maurya wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Please help me to understand the following syntax mentioned in the Golang
> language specification document.
>
> https://golang.org/ref/spec#Composite_literals
>
> following is the search string for CTRL + F
> // vowels[ch] is
On May 6, 2021, at 7:16 AM, Vitaly Isaev wrote:
>
> There is no similar type in C/C++/Go stdlib, but at least in C++ it's
> possible to model it using bit stealing approach (see C++ example). On x86_64
> arch only 48 bits of 64 bits are actually used, so one can store arbitrary
> data in the
On Jun 25, 2021, at 1:32 PM, Robert Engels wrote:
>
> Why not develop a Go <> CUDA binding using CGo?
This (ditto for OpenCL, Vulkan, etc) is more likely the path you'll have to go
down. Generally all of these interfaces rely on pretty massive libraries from
NVIDIA, AMD, Intel, etc. which
On Jun 25, 2021, at 10:23 PM, Robert Engels wrote:
>
> There is also a LOT of support for Java and CUDA/OpenCL. You can essentially
> reimplement them Java portion in Go. There are multiple open source projects
> in this area.
>
> Might be a lot easier than starting from scratch.
Yes, CGo
On Aug 22, 2021, at 23:11, jlfo...@berkeley.edu wrote:
>
>
> I've noticed that few, if any, Go programs use Makefiles. Is that because the
> overhead of using make is greater than the overhead of just always compiling
> and linking everything?
> One piece of evidence for this is that the Go
On Aug 23, 2021, at 12:48, Roland Müller wrote:
>
> What are the alternatives to Makefile that are used by Go developers? Please
> comment :-)
Well, there’s mage, which aims to more or less replace the functionality of
Make for Go. I’m not really sold on *needing* a replacement for Make, and
On Aug 5, 2021, at 10:27 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 5, 2021 at 7:20 PM Santi Ferra
> wrote:
>>
>> When you see the ranking of the most liked programming languages, go is near
>> c++, a really "hated app". But since is efficient and produces really clean
>> code, why no wants
On Oct 7, 2021, at 3:36 AM, Amnon wrote:
>
> Is it necessary for a http client to fully read the http response body?
>
> Opinion on the Go forums seems divided
> https://forum.golangbridge.org/t/do-i-need-to-read-the-body-before-close-it/5594
>
> But a simple benchmark
99 matches
Mail list logo
