Re: [go-nuts] [ANN] Edit - Acme command language

Hang by your pseudopod, write if you find a warm rich planet ripe for conquest. On 8 August 2017 at 22:49, Rob Pike wrote: > Grep for conquest. > > -rob > > > On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 6:58 AM, roger peppe wrote: >> On 8 August 2017 at 21:34, Michael Jones

Re: [go-nuts] [ANN] Edit - Acme command language

Grep for conquest. -rob On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 6:58 AM, roger peppe wrote: > On 8 August 2017 at 21:34, Michael Jones wrote: >> The Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse, surely! It would be tempting fate to >> shade them or step on their brand. > > Ah,

Re: [go-nuts] [ANN] Edit - Acme command language

On 8 August 2017 at 21:34, Michael Jones wrote: > The Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse, surely! It would be tempting fate to > shade them or step on their brand. Ah, but of which apocalypse? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

Re: [go-nuts] [ANN] Edit - Acme command language

The Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse, surely! It would be tempting fate to shade them or step on their brand. On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 5:54 AM, wrote: > Thanks for suggesting the Reader(q0, q1 int64) io.RuneReader. I > accidentally replied off list. > > I wasn't aware of up to

Re: [go-nuts] [ANN] Edit - Acme command language

Thanks for suggesting the Reader(q0, q1 int64) io.RuneReader. I accidentally replied off list. I wasn't aware of up to four horsemen being involved. The man pages didn't prepare me for this. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To

Re: [go-nuts] [ANN] Edit - Acme command language

On 8 August 2017 at 12:04, Rob Pike wrote: > When I wrote that (1985?), I was misinformed about the Four Horsemen. Which particular Four Horsemen would those be? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe

Re: [go-nuts] [ANN] Edit - Acme command language

When I wrote that (1985?), I was misinformed about the Four Horsemen. Also now "u-" is redo. -rob On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 8:59 PM, roger peppe wrote: > It's nice to see this, but it would be nicer still if it > was amenable to representations that weren't > just a slice of

Re: [go-nuts] [ANN] Edit - Acme command language

It's nice to see this, but it would be nicer still if it was amenable to representations that weren't just a slice of bytes (for example disk or network backed files, or just something which made insertions not O(n)). It seems like it might be possible to use Regexp.FindReader* to avoid

[go-nuts] [ANN] Edit - Acme command language

I'm sure this has been done already, but I thought I'd share my implementation of this here for anyone interested in using structural regular expressions in Go. It doesn't cover 100% of what Edit does in Acme, but its close enough that I can use the example program