Looks like performance is virtually identical in GCC 8.1:
ValueSetBytes-16 39.1ns ± 1% 104.5ns ± 0% +167.26% (p=0.029 n=4+4)
ValueSetFloat-16 25.9ns ± 1%67.8ns ± 0% +161.78% (p=0.029 n=4+4)
ValueSetBool-16 27.5ns ± 0%54.0ns ± 1% +96.18% (p=0.029 n=4+4)
ValueSetInt-
On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 11:31 AM, Tamir Duberstein wrote:
> What does all do? Anyway, the results are better, but still not "good":
Using "all" applies the options to all packages, not just the one being built.
Thanks for the benchmarks, it's something to look at.
Ian
>> nameol
What does all do? Anyway, the results are better, but still not "good":
nameold time/opnew time/opdelta
> ValueSetBytes-16 38.5ns ± 0% 105.8ns ± 4% +174.81% (p=0.008 n=5+5)
> ValueSetFloat-16 27.5ns ± 1%73.2ns ± 1% +166.38% (p=0.008 n=5+5)
> ValueSetBool
On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 10:59 AM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 6:42 AM, Tamir Duberstein wrote:
>> Built at this revision:
>> https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/commit/a82f431e184a9ac922ad43df73cdcc702ab0f279
>
> Thanks. What do you see from
>
> go test -gccgoflags="-g -O2"
>
On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 6:42 AM, Tamir Duberstein wrote:
> Built at this revision:
> https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/commit/a82f431e184a9ac922ad43df73cdcc702ab0f279
Thanks. What do you see from
go test -gccgoflags="-g -O2"
?
Ian
> On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 7:44 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
Built at this revision:
https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/commit/a82f431e184a9ac922ad43df73cdcc702ab0f279
On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 7:44 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 12:00 PM, Tamir Duberstein
> wrote:
> > Running the benchmarks in github.com/cockroachdb/cockroach/pkg/roa
On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 12:00 PM, Tamir Duberstein wrote:
> Running the benchmarks in github.com/cockroachdb/cockroach/pkg/roachpb:
>
>> PATH=$HOME/local/go1.10/bin:$PATH
>> go test -i ./pkg/roachpb && go test -run - -bench . ./pkg/roachpb -count 5
>> -benchmem > gc.txt
>>
>> PATH=$GCCROOT/gcc/bin
