Re: [go-nuts] libgo is more fast that grouting.

The best approach is not to feed the troll. Let's all just abandon this thread now. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to

Re: [go-nuts] libgo is more fast that grouting.

You are really toxic man. You are much more toxic than me. If you don't like Go, why do you write your feces here? Why do you like to be THE TROLL? Do you like attention so much so you are ready to be ridiculous for it? It looks so strange to me. воскресенье, 22 марта 2020 г., 13:42:16 UTC+3

Re: [go-nuts] libgo is more fast that grouting.

I just read an article about Oracle sued Google for Java. Surely go programming language will be abandoned soon. Google cannot make any popular production except search engine. Google only make prototype and toy production. I think that’s bc they think they are scientists or researchers, they

Re: [go-nuts] libgo is more fast that grouting.

WOW，only children from poor families do programming work. > On Mar 21, 2020, at 17:41, Dan Kortschak wrote: > > Please stop. > > > On Sat, 2020-03-21 at 17:20 +0800, 'Benjamin' via golang-nuts wrote: >> Tesla is commodity, but a programming language is not. >> >> ] >> >> >>> On Mar 20,

Re: [go-nuts] libgo is more fast that grouting.

Please stop. On Sat, 2020-03-21 at 17:20 +0800, 'Benjamin' via golang-nuts wrote: > Tesla is commodity, but a programming language is not. > > ] > > > > On Mar 20, 2020, at 14:55, Chris Burkert > > wrote: > > > > Do people ask for a Tesla with a combustion engine? No because they > > value

Re: [go-nuts] libgo is more fast that grouting.

Tesla is commodity, but a programming language is not. ] > On Mar 20, 2020, at 14:55, Chris Burkert wrote: > > Do people ask for a Tesla with a combustion engine? No because they value > what Tesla is doing and why they are doing it. And neither Tesla nor > Kubernetes or Docker are research

Re: [go-nuts] libgo is more fast that grouting.

Do people ask for a Tesla with a combustion engine? No because they value what Tesla is doing and why they are doing it. And neither Tesla nor Kubernetes or Docker are research projects. So please don’t whine about how things are. Instead (as Ian said) participate in a positive manner and

Re: [go-nuts] libgo is more fast that grouting.

Can you please stop. Numerous non-Google employees contribute to Go. It is not a research project any more than any activity in life is a research project. On Fri, 2020-03-20 at 13:52 +0800, 'Benjamin' via golang-nuts wrote: > I think the team of go programming language should invite other >

Re: [go-nuts] libgo is more fast that grouting.

I think the team of go programming language should invite other people that out of google join some part of the project. And you all can have more free time. Sometimes Lazy is good habit. It’s 10+ years, go should not be a research project now. How Many 10 years do you have? Like what is the

Re: [go-nuts] libgo is more fast that grouting.

On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 11:12 PM 'Benjamin' via golang-nuts wrote: > > Benchmark shows that lingo is faster than goroutine. > > Many china internet companies use similar c++ libraries to support trillions > of concurrency. > Like Tencent use a smiler project libco: >

Re: [go-nuts] libgo is more fast that grouting.

Benchmark shows that lingo is faster than goroutine. Many china internet companies use similar c++ libraries to support trillions of concurrency. Like Tencent use a smiler project libco: https://github.com/Tencent/libco I think the go team should learn some

Re: [go-nuts] libgo is more fast that grouting.

On Mon, 16 Mar 2020 20:13:10 +0800 "'Benjamin' via golang-nuts" wrote: > How do you all think about it? > IMO there's no such thing as "Go-style concurrency" if you don't have `select`, which doesn't looks like this library provides (as many others). —wagner -- You received this message