Re: [google-appengine] App Engine Flex Environment PHP Runtime document root not found

2017-05-26 Thread 'Takashi Matsuo' via Google App Engine
Hi Yao, I think you can use dispatch file or `target` in `cron.yaml` . Feel free to let us know

Re: [google-appengine] Re: GAE Flex PHP env better logging format

2017-05-26 Thread 'Takashi Matsuo' via Google App Engine
We're developing a new logging library, which is under alpha testing phase ( instructoins ). Please try this and let us know how it works for you. Thanks, On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 9:59 AM

Re: [google-appengine] GAE Flex Node.js health check 500 error

2017-05-26 Thread Yao Li
Yes, it works after I update app.yaml config from ``` vm: true ``` to ``` env: flex ``` On Friday, May 26, 2017 at 3:18:50 PM UTC-7, Justin Beckwith wrote: > > Greetings! Flex doesn't do anything special with those routes. Can you > hit your /_ah/health endpoint from the browser? Does

Re: [google-appengine] GAE Flex Node.js health check 500 error

2017-05-26 Thread 'Justin Beckwith' via Google App Engine
Greetings! Flex doesn't do anything special with those routes. Can you hit your /_ah/health endpoint from the browser? Does that work? On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 3:16 PM, Yao Li wrote: > > I have route for /_ah/health and it worked well (200 status) before, but > it's 500 from

[google-appengine] GAE Flex Node.js health check 500 error

2017-05-26 Thread Yao Li
I have route for /_ah/health and it worked well (200 status) before, but it's 500 from yesterday. I tried cancel routing for /_ah/health, it should be 404, but it's still 500. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To

[google-appengine] http://www.mineconics.net/ and Python 2.5

2017-05-26 Thread Dawn
Hi, I've been using mineconics (http://www.mineconics.net/) for some time and have now started to get "Support for Python 2.5 has turned off. Please refer to https://goo.gl/aESk5L for more information". I don't think it's been updated for some time but is there any way it can be made to work

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Connecting from app engine instance to compute engine instance directly

2017-05-26 Thread AJ Ross
I would like to connect to a microservice running on kubernetes cluster from my appengine application, while avoiding the need to transit the public internet. Since flex runs my appengine application as a cluster in GCE it seems like this should be possible? On Friday, May 26, 2017 at 1:26:50

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Connecting from app engine instance to compute engine instance directly

2017-05-26 Thread 'Justin Beckwith' via Google App Engine
No no no no :) We don't enable this directly in flex. May I ask - why are you trying to connect directly to a single instance? On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 1:20 PM, AJ Ross wrote: > If you're willing to migrate to Flex, it appears as though you can do it: > >

[google-appengine] Re: Connecting from app engine instance to compute engine instance directly

2017-05-26 Thread AJ Ross
If you're willing to migrate to Flex, it appears as though you can do it: https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/5RsoKIPWyTQ/pnxyI-anBAAJ On Wednesday, April 26, 2017 at 8:03:29 PM UTC-7, Bjorn Harvold wrote: > > Definitely a needed feature! > -- You received this message because you

[google-appengine] Re: App Engine to Compute Engine communication via internal IP

2017-05-26 Thread AJ Ross
Hey Lorne, thanks for the information. I have a "standard" instance and I'm migrating to "flex" in order to be able to open direct connections to a Kubernetes cluster. Good to know that this should work! On Wednesday, January 4, 2017 at 10:25:40 AM UTC-8, Lorne Kligerman wrote: > > As Adam

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Controlling the maximum number of instances / service in App Engine Standard?

2017-05-26 Thread 'Alex Martelli' via Google App Engine
On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 6:10 AM, Jeff Schnitzer wrote: > I’m confused - this is “low-volume data” but you're worried about > exceeding 4000 connections? Maybe I’m missing something in translation; how > many QPS do you expect? > I'm not sure why the QPS, per se, would

[google-appengine] Re: GAE Flex PHP env better logging format

2017-05-26 Thread 'Jun (Cloud Platform Support)' via Google App Engine
Hi Yao, You can actually write your application log entries using the psrLogger method, which will fetch a PSR-3 complaint logger, and you can have more info by looking at Writing applications logs

[google-appengine] Re: How do I get from deploying my app to having all the course data show up on my url?

2017-05-26 Thread 'Jun (Cloud Platform Support)' via Google App Engine
Hi Sarah, Can you provide more details regarding what steps/actions you've done by following the youtube video provided so that I can better understand your situation and assist you? - Jun On Thursday, May 25, 2017 at 1:04:35 PM UTC-4, Sarah Ziker wrote: > > Hello! > > I am creating a course

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Controlling the maximum number of instances / service in App Engine Standard?

2017-05-26 Thread Jeff Schnitzer
I’m confused - this is “low-volume data” but you're worried about exceeding 4000 connections? Maybe I’m missing something in translation; how many QPS do you expect? 4000 active connections is pretty crazy, even for a high-traffic system. http://www.mysqlcalculator.com/ expects that to consume

[google-appengine] Re: Do background threads prevent instances created with basic scaling from getting shut down?

2017-05-26 Thread Torbjørn Smørgrav
Hmm... looked at the number of instance graph now and it seems the instance is pretty much up all time (where it should have some hiatus periods). fredag 26. mai 2017 12.42.38 UTC+2 skrev Torbjørn Smørgrav følgende: > > Hi, > > My experience; > > I had the same issue, but for me goOffline seemed

[google-appengine] Re: Do background threads prevent instances created with basic scaling from getting shut down?

2017-05-26 Thread Torbjørn Smørgrav
Hi, My experience; I had the same issue, but for me goOffline seemed to work. It might take longer to before an instance is shut down - but my prime concern was that I eventually reached the threshold for background threads. After going offline this is no longer the case. Cheers, -Toby