[google-appengine] Re: "The process handling this request has unexpectedly died... (Error Code 203)"

Thanks edga...@google.com, You've given the first genuinely useful answer! It makes more sense that this could be due to the rate of 500 errors in our services. However, the service in question only has twenty-eight* 5xx errors in the past week that are not due to "The process handling this

[google-appengine] Re: "The process handling this request has unexpectedly died... (Error Code 203)"

When an instance returns to many sequential 5xx errors, our instance scheduling system will consider the instance unhealthy. The instance scheduler will then terminate this instance. When an instance gets terminated, and it still has a request queued, the queued request will throw the 203

Re: [google-appengine] Re: appcfg.py download_app fails silently

Hi, I tried the command and it works fine for me. I recommend that you raise a PRIVATE report in the Issue Tracker and provide us the project number and the version number so that we would be able to investigate the issue efficiently.

Re: [google-appengine] Node.js Standard: memory usage different for locally and deployed version on 30 - 40 Mb.

Hi George. Thanks, I will try to follow your offer. пт, 10 авг. 2018 г., 21:52 'George (Cloud Platform Support)' via Google App Engine : > Hi Aleksander, > > If you speak about a different, even if somehow related issue, it is > better to open a separate discussion on that subject. As this

Re: [google-appengine] Node.js Standard: memory usage different for locally and deployed version on 30 - 40 Mb.

Hi Aleksander, If you speak about a different, even if somehow related issue, it is better to open a separate discussion on that subject. As this Cloud Functions problem looks more like a technical issue, rather than general or opinion-based, and needs fixing, it is better to open it in the

[google-appengine] Re: Will Pipelines and MapReduce libraries work on Python 3.7?

Hello Jacob, It is difficult to predict such things as deprecation deadlines, as they depend on various factors such as requests from Customers, market outlook, actual needs and implementation of new features to replace the old. In any case, you should not worry as long as no public

[google-appengine] Re: Static IP/Reverse proxy for Standard environment?

Hello Mishra, You seem to look at your instances as endpoints for a Cloud VPN connection. In fact, Cloud VPN securely connects your on-premises network to your Google Cloud Platform (GCP) Virtual Private Cloud (VPC) network through an IPsec VPN connection. Traffic traveling between the two

Re: [google-appengine] Custom Domain much slower than $PROJECT_ID.appspot.com

Ah, yes, that does seem to be the case. That is unfortunate. Thanks for the link. On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 12:20 AM Ani Hatzis wrote: > Hi James, > > I believe you are affected by a known issue > . Last status was that > they are working on it,

Re: [google-appengine] Node.js Standard: memory usage different for locally and deployed version on 30 - 40 Mb.

But also exists same problem with Cloud Functions. There is created the same issue? > 10 авг. 2018 г., в 7:32, Aleksander Efremov написал(а): > > I won't argue, it's enough for me. Thanks for helping. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google >

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Oracle Database in an App Engine Application

Thanks Jordan for your response. On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 6:22 AM, 'Jordan (Cloud Platform Support)' via Google App Engine wrote: > You can setup an advanced network configuration > > in