Also, if I remember correctly, in the new pricing model there will not be
possible to reserve instances other than to cut down the cost; there is no
guarantee that the instances will always be loaded. So for an application
with low traffic, even with operational support and several reserved
Is this a serious question?
Your web app's WAR can just be installed into JBoss or Tomcat - then all
you'll have to do is rewrite all of your code which uses the datastore,
memcache, and any of the other GAE SDK APIs...
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
I started seeing errors due to changes in appengine security manager
and a new appengine
defined user-class loader on about July 21st for classes that I was
constructing on
the fly dynamically in the code using Constructor. In addition to
ExceptionInInitializerErrors there were logs statements
Here http://code.google.com/p/latke/ is a Servlet fwk project (dev in
progress) wraps the most of GAE APIs for application that based on the
framework could deploy to a standard Servlet container and GAE environment.
And, here http://b3log-solo.googlecode.com is a real-world blogging
program
Hello,
I want to use https with my domain www.AccountingGuru.in
Any ideas on how to do this?
Regards
-Aswath
www.AccountingGuru.in
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine for Java group.
To post to this group, send email to
And why so complicated price model? Isn't it possible to normalize
difference things like CPU, number of instances, data storage and bandwidth
cost etc into a single metric? And then have enough physical servers etc so
that too much instance swapping is prevented. With a normalization like that
Hi all,
I tried to update my Google plugin for Eclipse (Helios) to the new SDK
version (1.5.3), but the system tries to update plugin to 1.5.2 SDK
version.
I tried both from Remote site and from local archive.
Anyone has the same problem?
How may I solve my issue?
Thank you very much
Bye
Hi all,
I'm experiencing a problem with Memcache in the last days. I don't
touch that code from 6-7 months, ut in the last days I found in the
logs the following exception:
com.google.appengine.api.memcache.LogAndContinueErrorHandler
handleServiceError: Service error in memcache
Hi,
There have been a number of issues with MemCache availability over the last
few days. You need to ensure that your code is written in such a way that
if MemCache is unavailable, your application carries on as normal (if
possible) - at the end of the day it's only a cache, not a datastore.
Hi Simon, thank you for the fast response!
Surely my app is designed as you suggest: I try to get the object from
the cache, if not found I search it in the datastore.
Just a little confirm: what is the behavior of the methods
cache.containsKey(), cache.get() and cache.put() when the Memcache is
Hi,
According to the API docs, a* MemcacheServiceException goog_467659057*
http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/java/javadoc/com/google/appengine/api/memcache/MemcacheServiceException.htmlwill
be thrown for backend non-availability or similar error states which may
occur, but are not
Hi,
Additionally, it seems you can specify the error handling you would like in
your application using the ErrorHandler
http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/java/javadoc/com/google/appengine/api/memcache/ErrorHandler.htmlinterface
and the
switching to the high availability data store
fixed this for me.
On Aug 25, 10:30 am, Anders blabl...@gmail.com wrote:
I switched on the Always On option and it works inasmuch as the dashboard
shows three resident instances but new instances are started sometimes with
only a few seconds
I use the high replication datastore if that's what you mean by high
availability.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine for Java group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
They don't seem to update the plugin whenever a new SDK comes out, but you
can download the SDK manually and point the eclipse plugin to the SDK.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine for Java group.
To view this discussion on the web
Hi Roberto,
thanks for the response.
I think I'll have to proceed in the manual way as you said; I hoped
not to perform such action as the automatic way is far better!!
Do you know how many days (more or less) they need to update the
plugin to the latest version?
Thanks
bye
cghersi
On 26 Ago,
Another problem when switching to Always On is that sometimes when I upload
new versions of the application no change happens! Even when I wait several
minutes after the upload. Is Google App Engine really a finished product? Or
is it still in a trial version? It's starting to feel really
Are you talking about static resources, or your Java compiled code? The
former can be cached on the front-end servers, so you need to use some
cache-busting techniques to get around that if you are updating static
resources. I can't say I've ever experienced issues with Java code being
I should add that, as far as I'm aware, GAE is still in beta - it is due to
come out of beta by the end of the year I believe.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine for Java group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
i wonder you resolve the issue. I am having the similar problem. on my
app engine. one servlet gets data and post data as multipart/form-
data to answer servlet. the form contain very small zip file that I am
generating in fly. whever, receiver servlet tried to read file
content, i am getting
In this case it was the Java code. First it it took me several uploads to
make the change happen. Now it's not even working with several uploads. I
have used appcfg rollback recently and will try that again if I can get the
upload to work. Frustrating!
--
You received this message because you
It's in the roadmap.
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 3:56 AM, Aswath Satrasala
aswath.satras...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I want to use https with my domain www.AccountingGuru.in
Any ideas on how to do this?
Regards
-Aswath
www.AccountingGuru.in
--
You received this message because you are
I had a Guice filter and I fixed it by putting the AppStats filter before
the Guice filter
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine for Java group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
Hi,
I know that you cannot do a LIKE clause in BigTable. How do you get around
this issue?
Suppose I'm making a book database, and I want to implement a search
function that compares titles against a random string. What is a plausible
mechanism with which to do so?
Any help would be
see https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine-java/-/vyB42yXkoIwJ
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 8:18 AM, cghersi cristiano.ghe...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Roberto,
thanks for the response.
I think I'll have to proceed in the manual way as you said; I hoped
not to perform such action as the
Any comments or advices?
--
Guit: Elegant, beautiful, modular and *production ready* gwt applications.
http://code.google.com/p/guit/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine for Java group.
To post to this group, send email to
Now the performance is pretty good. And to not appear as a total jerk I want
to add that overall GAE is really awesome. Now I can focus on the really
challenging part which is to generate massive traffic. And then it will be
interesting to see how GAE will manage that. :-)
--
You received
Hi,
At the moment you can only use SSL on the appspot domain, more information
on our FAQ:
http://code.google.com/appengine/kb/general.html#httpsapps
Hope this helps!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine for Java group.
To view this
Hi Anders,
Part of the new billing plan is to have Always on go away, they are going to
be replace by Min Idle Instances. as of SDK 1.5.2 we made some changes to
the Scheduler on how the reserved instances behave.
I would recommend you should take a look at this two threads on the groups
Hi Jose,
Ok, setting idle instances would be similar to Always On I assume. Plus I
read in one of those threads that they are working on fixing some instance
scheduler bug. So that should make the performance smoother. Unless they try
to squeeze too many instances into too few physical
30 matches
Mail list logo
