[appengine-java] Re: Log4J vs. java.util.logging in App Engine projects

2009-09-02 Thread Rajeev Dayal
Hi Bill, Would you mind filing an issue for this: http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/list Thanks, Rajeev On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 10:12 PM, Bill Higgins billh...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks again for the explanation Rajeev. I would politely suggest beefing up the header comments in

[appengine-java] Re: Log4J vs. java.util.logging in App Engine projects

2009-09-01 Thread Bill Higgins
Thanks much for the response Rajeev. Let me see if I can repeat and reduce it to make sure I understand the formula. 1) DataNucleus will use EITHER log4j OR java.util.logging. It never uses both. 2) DataNucleus will use log4j if it detects log4j classes on the classpath, otherwise it will use

[appengine-java] Re: Log4J vs. java.util.logging in App Engine projects

2009-09-01 Thread Rajeev Dayal
Yes, I think you've got it exactly right. If you notice any deviations from this behavior, please post back on this thread and let us know. On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 9:31 AM, Bill Higgins billh...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks much for the response Rajeev. Let me see if I can repeat and reduce it to