this is a nice thing. thanks for providing this template to the
community...
On 21 Feb., 16:19, SRF srfar...@gmail.com wrote:
I put together a project to help developers get started with deploying
a Wicket application on Google App Engine. It's a re-implementation of
the Guestbook demo. It
checkout the latest source from compass. The last commit removes the
Referencable interface.
On 17 Feb., 14:36, Raphael André Bauer raphael.andre.ba...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 8:15 AM, yonny yon...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hello Folks,
I think deploying a compass app on gae
folder)...
ra!
On 17 Feb 2010, at 21:23, a.maza wrote:
checkout the latest source from compass. The last commit removes the
Referencable interface.
On 17 Feb., 14:36, Raphael André Bauer raphael.andre.ba...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 8:15 AM, yonny yon
.
On Sun, Feb 7, 2010 at 4:34 AM, a.maza andr.m...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I am keeping non-critical data (which is updated quite often) in
memcache. I would like to use a cronjob to fetch the data in frequent
intervalls from memcache in order to persist it to the datastore.
Thus, I would
Hello,
I am keeping non-critical data (which is updated quite often) in
memcache. I would like to use a cronjob to fetch the data in frequent
intervalls from memcache in order to persist it to the datastore.
Thus, I would be interested if anyone has any experiences with the
average expiration
in principle, I like to work with both, JDO and JPA. but using either
of them requires (in most cases) use of the osiv pattern, which in
turn results in using something like spring. Keeping the discussions
about request and startup performance in mind, apps on GAE shouldn't
make use of too many
sorry for this maybe thumb question, but I just want to make sure:
both frameworks are making the needs for open session in view (as
almost required when using jdo/jpa in web applications) obsolete,
or?
regards,
andr
On 26 Jan., 12:18, John Patterson jdpatter...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Chau, yes
On 17 Dez., 23:11, Ikai L (Google) ika...@google.com wrote:
When you say it doesn't work, do you mean that it does not retrieve the
entity?
right, no entity was found.
Can you try creating a Key with the id instead of passing the ID
directly?
On 14 Dez., 10:35, drone andr...@gmail.com wrote:
I see now, that they can be found inhttp://www.mvnsearch.org/maven2/
repository, so I will try updating maven-gae-plugin as soon as I have
some free time.
Are you sure? I just checked that but I've found no appengine-related
libs there.
--
According to the documentation on
http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/java/datastore/creatinggettinganddeletingdata.html#Keys
it should be possible to retrieve an entity using a different key type
than the key field in the class.
Assuming the following entity having a key (encoded string) and a
ref=RootConsoleAppender
/
/root
/configuration
Philippe Marschall wrote:
On Dec 12, 2:50 pm, a.maza andr.m...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I have currently some troubles with logging in junit tests. In
general, I have the following questions:
-) According
I just checked the DN docs and was able to answer this (dumb) question
myself.
DN's logging can be configured using its logging categories.
On 13 Dez., 11:34, a.maza andr.m...@gmail.com wrote:
thanks for your help. using logback for everything through the slf4j
bridges is really an improvement
Hello,
I have currently some troubles with logging in junit tests. In
general, I have the following questions:
-) According to the manuals, I could basically use any log framework
which logs to System.out and System.err, respectively (e.g., log4j).
However, for having a fine grained selection
I am using Spring and OpenPersistenceManagerInView as well.
I experienced various problems. I am now using
pmf.getPersistenceManagerProxy() (instead of pmf.getPersistenceManager
()) and it works quite fine.
regards,
andreas
On 8 Dez., 17:30, tal tal.j@gmail.com wrote:
I might be having
On 4 Dez., 12:04, Raphael André Bauer raphael.andre.ba...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 11:46 AM, a.maza andr.m...@gmail.com wrote:
regarding compass:
1. Task queues do not work, because tasks might get executed in
parallel what almost for sure messes up your index
(http
this is a known issue.. there are several threads in this forum about
it
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java/search?group=google-appengine-javaq=naming+exception
On 2 Dez., 12:33, Rafael Reuber psico.in...@gmail.com wrote:
The log shows this:
are less irksome.
James H wrote:
This seems to be at the core of much confusion...hopefully one of the
persistence experts will weigh in and enlighten us. I keep watch on
this thread and weigh in a bit later, in a rush at the moment!
On Nov 11, 7:39 am, a.maza andr.m...@gmail.com wrote:
I
why are you not using another class that implements the MediaSource
interface - e.g., MediaByteSource or MediaStreamSource?
regards,
andr
On 11 Nov., 21:22, Ikai L (Google) ika...@google.com wrote:
Kishore,
Here are the docs related to sending the data as
I think this may help you
http://code.google.com/p/gae-query-pager/
On 11 Nov., 18:50, Sanjith Chungath csanj...@gmail.com wrote:
Greetings to All,
I found this
documentationhttp://code.google.com/appengine/articles/paging.htmlon paging
in python.
Can some one suggest the
hello,
my GAE project in eclipse has the following structure (maven-like)
*) src/main contains my application - it is comiled to war/WEB-INF/
classes
*) src/test contain my junit tests - it is compiled to target/test
in both source folders (src/main and src/test) I have a META-INF
folder with a
same here, when I try to have my junit tests in the same project.
anyone got a solution?
On 28 Okt., 18:22, Vince Bonfanti vbonfa...@gmail.com wrote:
No, that didn't help. Again, just to make sure I'm being clear:
- The only reason appengine-api-stubs.jar and
appengine-local-runtime.jar are
thanks for your answers:
Pierre, the StreamingQueryResult is not serializable. However, to my
understanding this problem is alleviated when you work with detached
objects since you call something like
Collection c = pm.detachCopyAll(resultList);
at the end and you are then returning the
I am thinking if it makes sense from a design perspektive to model
unowned bi-directional one-to-many relationships.I did some search on
the web but didn't find many thoughts about such type of relationship.
The two entity types I have should not be in an owned relationship for
some reasons.
I've used the merging of transient objects approach for a while as
described in
http://timepedia.blogspot.com/2009/04/google-appengine-and-gwt-now-marriage.html
and it works quite fine. I only subsituted the proposed implementation
of copying fields by dozer.
However, I am still thinking to
I'll be happy to share the code as soon as it is running smoothly and
I got rid of the above mentioned AccessControlException.
Thus, I hope somebody could give me a hint what is causing the
exception.
Regards,
andr
On 21 Okt., 23:14, Esteban Masoero emaso...@getsense.com.ar wrote:
a.maza
thanks jason for clarifying this. just to be sure since Larry's class
carries the detachable=true annotation:
keep detachable memcached objects their ability to be re-attached
later on?
thanks,
andr
On 21 Okt., 18:22, Larry Cable larry.ca...@gmail.com wrote:
cheers ... makes sense!
On Oct
26 matches
Mail list logo
