Joe,
I copied your class, and get the same exception. One thing I see
you're doing is attempting to annotate a method, when you should be
annotating properties. I also see you don't have an @Id, or @Basic
property annotations. I'm know to this, too, but I hope it helps.
Guser
On Feb 2, 2:58 pm,
There are no build errors or missing dependancies. I use the regular
buildpath containing only the App Engine SDK Library, JUnit3 Library,
JRE System Library plus the external jars:
... eclipse\plugins\com.google.appengine.eclipse.sdkbundle.
Hi,
There appears to be a bug - or at least undesired behavior - regarding
cron jobs. Let's say there's a test and a production (the active)
version of an app. If you add a cron job to cron.xml in test, one
would expect that job is bound to that specific version. Instead what
I'm seeing:
- the
Hi,
It's the same with data. Data is for all versions. I don't want to say
this is a bug, because in some regards it's nice that data is shared,
but in other situations it's not. It would be nice to be able to
compartmentalize an app somehow.
:-) Kasper
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 11:40 AM, phraktle
Hello,
I have been having many issues trying to get Firefox and Chrome to
operate properly with the GWT Plugin for the browsers. The only
browser that I am not having issues with is Explorer, it works but is
very slow.
I have been doing the GWT tutorials for a project and I just wondered
if
Sorry posted in wrong discussion group.
On Feb 3, 11:29 am, Mikey87 mwhit...@live.co.uk wrote:
Hello,
I have been having many issues trying to get Firefox and Chrome to
operate properly with the GWT Plugin for the browsers. The only
browser that I am not having issues with is Explorer, it
I did further investigation on my unittest (code is pasted in my previous
email).
The second transaction block is not persisting the SecurityGroup Entity.
If I add the following line with in txn block,
securityGroup = pm.getObjectById(SecurityGroup.class,
securityGroup.getId());
I see the
Cron jobs always execute against the default version.
A feature I use a lot to compartmentalise data with Twig is versioned
datastores. It basically just prepends a version number to the
Entity kind for all instances stored or queried with that session. So
effectively you have multiple
we have 4 membership in google app engine project. we code in local
Machine and manager source by subverion, in devolop ,when some one
create a record(eg.create a company object) but others membership
can't use this company object.
is there any way to share local_db.bin to each other or all
Hi, i've got a little problem with localization settings when i deploy
my applications.
I'm in france and when i format a date with a simpledateformat, i've
got a offset of 2 hours with my french clock.
How can i define my localizations parameters for my application ?
Thanks
Grégoire
--
There actually seems to be a mistake in the documentation:
// Give me all Employees with lastName equal to Smith or Jones
Query query = pm.newQuery(Employee.class,
:p.contains(lastName));
query.execute(Arrays.asList(Smith, Jones));
Surely it should be:
//
Wow that mistake in the documentation wasted days of my time. Thankyou
datanucleus.
On Feb 3, 5:40 pm, Ftaylor finbarrtay...@googlemail.com wrote:
There actually seems to be a mistake in the documentation:
// Give me all Employees with lastName equal to Smith or Jones
Query query =
my demo
fist，
public class CommentTheme {
@PrimaryKey
@Persistent(valueStrategy = IdGeneratorStrategy.IDENTITY)
private Key key;
@Persistent
private String theme;
}
then
for (int i = 20; i 0; i--) {
CommentTheme
so What is the problem!
String can have null values and int can't perhaps ? If you'd used
Integer then all would have been fine. All records in the datastore
don't have that field.
PS. You DO NOT need to put @Persistent on a field of basic Java type
like String, int, long, etc, despite what the
Tutorial : GWT UiBinder with JAX-RS Jersey and Objectify on Google App
Engine @ http://wp.me/PnkVx-1S
Iqbal
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine for Java group.
To post to this group, send email to
Hello App Engine Developers,
As part of our ongoing efforts to improve release quality and
transparency, we will start prereleasing SDKs for early testing. We
hope this gives developers a chance to participate in our release
process by trying out new changes and sending feedback. As of this
Or would this would be more efficient if all you need is a count?
DatastoreService.prepare(query).countEntities();
I don't know the answer, but I've been wondering the same thing...
/dmc
http://turbomanage.wordpress.com
On Feb 2, 10:05 pm, Max thebb...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I am designing my
Moritz,
Take a look at this article if you haven't done it yet.
http://code.google.com/intl/en/appengine/articles/update_schema.html
It gives some recommendations that could be applicable to your task.
Eventhough, it was written for Python, the same principals apply to
Java.
I'm also currently
It's me again.
Just started from scratch: opened a new workspace, configured Eclipse
to point to JDK, built guestbook guided by appengine docs, set up
DataNucleus... and Voila
All is working now, the question is closed.
On Feb 2, 4:52 pm, SD shared.diar...@gmail.com wrote:
Any deployable demo
Ok. That would be a good advice.
On Feb 2, 5:10 am, Ikai L (Google) ika...@google.com wrote:
The way to do this is to create a series of tasks that update each entity
one by one.
The question I'd like to ask, however, is why you'd want to do this. It's
typically best practice to store time
Some people said that it is not a problem and we can just ignore it.
On Jan 30, 2:33 am, chiappone chiapp...@gmail.com wrote:
I am noticing the same issue, were you able to figure the cause?
On Dec 6 2009, 6:12 pm, mar_novice mariocape1...@gmail.com wrote:
I've noticed that there are some
Hi Ikai,
Cool!
It might be trivial but, I've filed an issue with SDK 1.3.1 prerelease.
http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=2721
--
Takashi Matsuo
Kay's daddy
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 7:05 AM, Ikai L (Google) ika...@google.com wrote:
Hello App Engine Developers,
As part
I guess I have to opt for option 1. As the Venue and Person have
already been persisted (e.g. Venue(12087) and Person(1)) before a Tip
is created (posted on a venue by a person). In this case, I have to
use one owned one-to-many relationship (between Venue and Tips) and
one unowned one-to-many
If a Person and a Venue only ever have one Tip then you can re-put
them with the parent child relationship you want.
But if I understand what you are trying to do here that is not a
correct representation?
On 4 Feb 2010, at 12:25, Wong wrote:
I guess I have to opt for option 1. As the
24 matches
Mail list logo
