Re: [gcj] Re: Lawn Patterns Alternate Solution

2013-04-18 Thread Atul Vani
Did it work, or you got incorrect response too? On Thursday, April 18, 2013 1:56:07 AM UTC+5:30, rohit jangid wrote: +1 did the same  On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 11:46 AM, Atul Vani atul...@gmail.com wrote: I did the same too, there was no other logic except this one. Though my output

Re: [gcj] Re: Lawn Patterns Alternate Solution

2013-04-17 Thread Atul Vani
I did the same too, there was no other logic except this one. Though my output was stated incorrect, so I thought there is more to it then just this, and left the problem. Didn't want to do a brute force approach. Is there any other logic required except this, of this is enough? On Mon, Apr 15,

Re: [gcj] Re: Lawn Patterns Alternate Solution

2013-04-17 Thread rohit jangid
+1 did the same On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 11:46 AM, Atul Vani atulv...@gmail.com wrote: I did the same too, there was no other logic except this one. Though my output was stated incorrect, so I thought there is more to it then just this, and left the problem. Didn't want to do a brute force

[gcj] Re: Lawn Patterns Alternate Solution

2013-04-15 Thread JF Dionne
This is what I did too. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Code Jam group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-code+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to

[gcj] Re: Lawn Patterns Alternate Solution

2013-04-15 Thread maverickBoom
I also solved it this way Le lundi 15 avril 2013 13:41:49 UTC+2, Sam Scott a écrit : There's another way to look at the lawn patterns question (Problem B). Every square must be equal to the max of it's row or equal to the max of its column (or both). Any violation of this (i.e. a square that