Re: [gcj] Qualification round problem - Nested depth

2020-04-08 Thread Avinash Bhardwaj
Case #1: ((2)) On Wednesday, April 8, 2020 at 10:36:20 AM UTC+2, Paul Smith wrote: > > What is your output for 2? > > It should be ((2)) but I think you’ll get ((2)) with your program? > > On Wed, 8 Apr 2020 at 05:30, Avinash Bhardwaj > wrote: > >>

Re: [gcj] Qualification round problem - Nested depth

2020-04-08 Thread Avinash Bhardwaj
The output is Case #1: ((2)) On Wednesday, April 8, 2020 at 10:36:20 AM UTC+2, Paul Smith wrote: > > What is your output for 2? > > It should be ((2)) but I think you’ll get ((2)) with your program? > > On Wed, 8 Apr 2020 at 05:30, Avinash Bhardwaj > wrote:

Re: [gcj] Qualification round problem - Nested depth

2020-04-07 Thread Avinash Bhardwaj
lification Round 2020 - Code Jam 2020 timeline 3 question_answer Nesting Depth (5pts, 11pts) Practice Submissions Attempt 1 Sample Failed: WA Apr 5 2020, 09:03 remove_red_eye Competitive Submissions Attempt 2 Sample Failed: WA 19:43:51 remove_red_eye Attempt 1 Sample Failed: WA 19:41:01

[gcj] Qualification round problem - Nested depth

2020-04-06 Thread Avinash Bhardwaj
I prepared several testcases and each one is passing as per the rules stated in the problem. But still I get WA: wrong answer. Could anyone point me out to a possible case where my solution fails? It'd be great help #include #include #include using namespace std; int main() { int T , N ;

Re: [gcj] Re: Qualification round problem - Nested depth

2020-04-09 Thread Avinash Bhardwaj
the code prints a new line character with endl, the \0 > is redundant, causing that pesky WA error. I ran your code without adding > the \0 to the output, and it passed both test cases. Hope this helps! > > Best, > Matt > > > On Monday, April 6, 2020 at 8:56:20 PM UTC-4, A