Re: [gcj] Parenting Partnering: Analysis

Thanks a lot Paul and Abhishek! =) On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 2:28 AM, Abhishek Nanda wrote: > C (0-720) and J(720-1440) is two exchanges, one at time 0 and another at > time 720. The exchange at time 0 is the same as the exchange at time 1440 > depending on which day you

Re: [gcj] Parenting Partnering: Analysis

C (0-720) and J(720-1440) is two exchanges, one at time 0 and another at time 720. The exchange at time 0 is the same as the exchange at time 1440 depending on which day you count midnight. What you've listed is sample 4, and the answer is indeed 4 for it. Sample 3's input is: 1 1 1439 1440 0 1

Re: [gcj] Parenting Partnering: Analysis

In sample case 3, J must have the baby for 0 to 1, and C must have the baby from 1439 to 1440. I think you've misread the input perhaps? On Tue, 2 May 2017 at 09:16 Paul Smith wrote: > You do this pattern every day, so if C has the baby from 0 to 719, and > hands over

Re: [gcj] Parenting Partnering: Analysis

You do this pattern every day, so if C has the baby from 0 to 719, and hands over to J for 720-1439, J has to hand back to C to start the next day. If you think about it, the number of exchanges must always be even, otherwise the next day starts with a different parent. On Tue, 2 May 2017 at

[gcj] Parenting Partnering: Analysis

is 0 midnight? is 1440 midnight? why if C (0-720) and J(720-1440) is not only ONE exchange? I didn't understand sample case 3: 2 2 0 1 1439 1440 1438 1439 1 2 time taking care of the baby: James..: 0-1, 720-1438, 1439-1440 Cameron: 1-720, 1438-1439 I counted 4