Re: Guice 2 prerelease snapshot 20090205

2009-02-08 Thread Stuart McCulloch
2009/2/9 je...@swank.ca > > I've tagged a new snapshot and uploaded new binaries for a new > prerelease. This is a preview of Guice 2. Since the previous 20081123 > snapshot, we've improved servlets, private modules, assisted inject > and performance. This .zip includes the guice jar, extension j

Re: Guice 2 prerelease snapshot 20090205

2009-02-08 Thread Dhanji R. Prasanna
congratulations jesse and thanks for all your hard work. =) On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 7:37 AM, je...@swank.ca wrote: > > I've tagged a new snapshot and uploaded new binaries for a new > prerelease. This is a preview of Guice 2. Since the previous 20081123 > snapshot, we've improved servlets, privat

Guice 2 prerelease snapshot 20090205

2009-02-08 Thread je...@swank.ca
I've tagged a new snapshot and uploaded new binaries for a new prerelease. This is a preview of Guice 2. Since the previous 20081123 snapshot, we've improved servlets, private modules, assisted inject and performance. This .zip includes the guice jar, extension jars, and javadoc: http://google-g

Re: Memory leaks in r834

2009-02-08 Thread Bob Lee
This was just an update to the new API (MapMaker in place of ReferenceCache). I still need to address the issues w/ security contexts and inheritable thread locals. I think I can resolve the security reference by starting the thread in a doPriveleged() wrapper. I plan to use reflection to null ou

Weekly Nascar Pocket Guide

2009-02-08 Thread binge
Weekly Nascar Pocket Guide http://nascar.bloggerhelp.cn/ --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "google-guice" group. To post to this group, send email to google-guice@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from t

Re: Memory leaks in r834

2009-02-08 Thread Gili Tzabari
I began this discussion thread because in revision 830 Bob committed changes with a description "Replace ReferenceCache w/ MapMaker". It's not clear what really changed between ReferenceCache and MapMaker. If you take a look at MapMaker, FinalizableReferenceQueue and Finalizer it look

Re: Memory leaks in r834

2009-02-08 Thread Stuart McCulloch
2009/2/8 Gili > > Stuart, > > It was my understanding [1] that there was no need for a worker > thread. I thought that we had established that there were concurrent > reference map implementations out there that will do a great job > without it and one of them might even end up in Java7 (all the

Re: Memory leaks in r834

2009-02-08 Thread Gili
Stuart, It was my understanding [1] that there was no need for a worker thread. I thought that we had established that there were concurrent reference map implementations out there that will do a great job without it and one of them might even end up in Java7 (all the better since we'd end up usi

Unlimited Wii Downloads! Wii Games, Wii Music & Much More!

2009-02-08 Thread binge
Unlimited Wii Downloads! Wii Games, Wii Music & Much More! http://wii.bloggerhelp.cn/ --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "google-guice" group. To post to this group, send email to google-guice@googlegro

Re: Memory leaks in r834

2009-02-08 Thread Stuart McCulloch
2009/2/7 Gili > Hi, > > I noticed you guys committed some new code to tackle the memory leaks > recently so I gave it a spin. I still see the memory leak under > Glassfish v2ur2 and the GC root that is keeping the instances alive > seems to be com.google.inject.internal.Finalizer. > > Stuart, can