Thanks again, you've been hitting the spot: The implementation was abstract.
But, I guess, this error message leaves room for improvement...
On Wednesday, December 18, 2013 2:41:01 PM UTC+1, Stuart McCulloch wrote:
>
> On 18 Dec 2013, at 13:34, Jochen Wiedmann >
> wrote:
>
> Thanks, Stuart,
>
On 18 Dec 2013, at 13:34, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
> Thanks, Stuart,
>
> okay, that's understood. But, what is the error? Note, that I was binding
> PropertyFactory (an interface), but the error message indicates that
> PropertyFactoryImpl (the implementation) wasn't bound?
What does PropertyFac
Thanks, Stuart,
okay, that's understood. But, what *is* the error? Note, that I was binding
PropertyFactory (an interface), but the error message indicates that
PropertyFactoryImpl (the implementation) wasn't bound?
Jochen
On Wednesday, December 18, 2013 1:11:48 PM UTC+1, Stuart McCulloch wr
On 18 Dec 2013, at 08:30, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
> I was able to reduce the problem down to the following:
>
> final Module module = new Module(){
> public void configure(Binder binder) {
>
> binder.bind(PropertyFactory.class).to(PropertyFactoryImpl.class).in
I was able to reduce the problem down to the following:
final Module module = new Module(){
public void configure(Binder binder) {
binder.bind(PropertyFactory.class).to(PropertyFactoryImpl.class).in(Scopes.SINGLETON);
}
};
Guice.crea
could you post the configure method of your CoreModule
On 12/17/2013 12:14 PM, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
Hi,
in a module, I get the error message:
com.google.inject.CreationException: Guice creation errors:
1) No implementation for com.foo.PropertyFactoryImpl was bound.
at com.foo.CoreModul
Hi,
in a module, I get the error message:
com.google.inject.CreationException: Guice creation errors:
1) No implementation for com.foo.PropertyFactoryImpl was bound.
at com.foo.CoreModule.configure(CoreModule.java:66)
While that message might make perfect sense when injecting a value, it
oc
