> is there a way to
> skip the geocode step altogether assuming I already have the LatLng
> coordinates in my Fusion Table?
Absolutely. But you must must have them in a single column comma
separated
lat,lng
When setting up a Fusion Table by an import, there is a step where
data types of each co
Thanks Esa. Actually I've worked a lot with FT layers and must agree.
The reason I was looking into this was because, by generating the
markers rather than in an FT layer, I was able to give them titles
(equivalent to title="" in anchor tags). Other marker mouseover
effects could also be set.
If
I would recommend using Fusion Tables Layers
http://code.google.com/apis/maps/documentation/javascript/overlays.html#FusionTables
You can make SQL queries with them too. Further you can geocode the
address data in Fusion Tables. Now you are fetching addresses from a
Fusion Table and geocoding them
Figured it based on this:
http://code.google.com/apis/maps/documentation/javascript/overlays.html#RemovingOverlays
Silly me!
On Mar 6, 9:03 pm, Nick wrote:
> Anyone had any luck with Gviz queries in the maps API version 3?
>
> The idea being to remove the initial query and replace it with a new
