Re: [Google Wave APIs] Re: Linking one wave in another with participants

2009-12-23 Thread Avital Oliver
I wouldn't want it to invite all the participants - unless they click on the link they shouldn't see it in their inbox. On Dec 23, 2009 10:20 PM, Chris Carlin chrisrcar...@gmail.com wrote: I would expect there to be some mechanism where if a link is placed it gives a key to anyone see... I

Re: [Google Wave APIs] Re: State change

2009-12-08 Thread Avital Oliver
You're right - you can't do any regular AJAX calls. All AJAX calls must respect the same-domain restriction. Instead, use a JSONP-like mechanism (a hack involving embedding a script tag by the DOM to load a server-side generated script with the information needed) -- http://wave.theWE.net

Re: [Google Wave APIs] Re: State change

2009-12-06 Thread Avital Oliver
Gadgets are executed in iframes with variable domains (something like *-opensocial.google.com where * can be any number). Cookies are stored on a per-domain basis, so you may or may not be able to read the cookie you stored once you open the wave containing the gadget a second time. --

Re: [Google Wave APIs] Re: Accessing a blip from a different context/wave

2009-11-25 Thread Avital Oliver
We have been developing similar robots. This has to do with the underlying robot protocol - all it does it send a list of events that happened on the wave and read back a list of operations. The event bundle, as its called, which is sent only contains the data about the wave that has been modified

Re: [Google Wave APIs] Re: Robot Access Robot

2009-11-23 Thread Avital Oliver
of sugestions doc = spell+b~+ + tail of content blip id) - They are not available in event context for another robot. Annotations contain only references to nodes inside these docs. On 23 ноя, 13:01, Avital Oliver avi...@thewe.net wrote: I don't think you can do that but Spelly works

Re: [Google Wave APIs] Robot Access Robot

2009-11-22 Thread Avital Oliver
I don't think you can do that but Spelly works by inserting special annotations into the wave. Your robot should be able to see these annotations and modify them to contain your new words. -- http://blog.thewe.net http://twitter.com/theWE_ On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 2:36 AM, Eyal eya...@gmail.com

[Google Wave APIs] Several questions regarding robot modification of gadget states

2009-11-18 Thread Avital Oliver
Hello friends, We are working on a mechanism for replication of portions of gadget states in different waves using robots. Basically, our robot responds to a BLIP_SUBMITTED event on one wave and sends one or more DOCUMENT_ELEMENT_MODIFY_ATTRS operations to one or more gadgets. We are writing our

[Google Wave APIs] Re: Handling concurrent/simultaneous gadget state changes.

2009-10-12 Thread Avital Oliver
1. As far as I know this is planned by google (you can find it in one of the office hours) 2. Much of this can already be done with the primitive gadget API using some scheme of splitting objects into seperate keys (for example a key called obj1.val2 to represent the val2 field in the obj1

[Google Wave APIs] Re: Robots and Privacy

2009-10-07 Thread Avital Oliver
People can also do this. This has nothing to do with robots. -- http://thewe.net On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 3:42 AM, Wilz alth...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I'm a bit surprised no one asked this question yet (or maybe I'm a noob who just doesn't get it heh). After reading through the API

[Google Wave APIs] Re: Strange behaviour when using Gadget API

2009-10-05 Thread Avital Oliver
The same error happens with MooTools. I believe it might be for the same reason. See if you can use this MooTools solution for your problem. http://wave.thewe.net/2009/09/07/google-wave-gadgets-using-mootools/ -- http://thewe.net On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 7:10 PM, Ge meisterme...@gmail.com