I wouldn't want it to invite all the participants - unless they click on the
link they shouldn't see it in their inbox.
On Dec 23, 2009 10:20 PM, Chris Carlin chrisrcar...@gmail.com wrote:
I would expect there to be some mechanism where if a link is placed it
gives a key to anyone see...
I
You're right - you can't do any regular AJAX calls. All AJAX calls must
respect the same-domain restriction. Instead, use a JSONP-like mechanism (a
hack involving embedding a script tag by the DOM to load a server-side
generated script with the information needed)
--
http://wave.theWE.net
Gadgets are executed in iframes with variable domains (something like
*-opensocial.google.com where * can be any number). Cookies are stored
on a per-domain basis, so you may or may not be able to read the
cookie you stored once you open the wave containing the gadget a
second time.
--
We have been developing similar robots. This has to do with the underlying
robot protocol - all it does it send a list of events that happened on the
wave and read back a list of operations. The event bundle, as its called,
which is sent only contains the data about the wave that has been modified
of sugestions doc =
spell+b~+ + tail of content blip id) -
They are not available in event context for another robot.
Annotations contain only references to nodes inside these docs.
On 23 ноя, 13:01, Avital Oliver avi...@thewe.net wrote:
I don't think you can do that but Spelly works
I don't think you can do that but Spelly works by inserting special
annotations into the wave. Your robot should be able to see these
annotations and modify them to contain your new words.
--
http://blog.thewe.net
http://twitter.com/theWE_
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 2:36 AM, Eyal eya...@gmail.com
Hello friends,
We are working on a mechanism for replication of portions of gadget states
in different waves using robots. Basically, our robot responds to a
BLIP_SUBMITTED event on one wave and sends one or more
DOCUMENT_ELEMENT_MODIFY_ATTRS operations to one or more gadgets. We are
writing our
1. As far as I know this is planned by google (you can find it in one of the
office hours)
2. Much of this can already be done with the primitive gadget API using some
scheme of splitting objects into seperate keys (for example a key called
obj1.val2 to represent the val2 field in the obj1
People can also do this. This has nothing to do with robots.
--
http://thewe.net
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 3:42 AM, Wilz alth...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I'm a bit surprised no one asked this question yet (or maybe I'm a
noob who just doesn't get it heh). After reading through the API
The same error happens with MooTools. I believe it might be for the same
reason. See if you can use this MooTools solution for your problem.
http://wave.thewe.net/2009/09/07/google-wave-gadgets-using-mootools/
--
http://thewe.net
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 7:10 PM, Ge meisterme...@gmail.com
10 matches
Mail list logo