On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 6:59 PM, Brian May
br...@microcomaustralia.com.au wrote:
If you never add anyone on Google's servers to your wave, the wave's
data will never get to their server (e.g. if you are running a private
one and block federation.)
I might be wrong, however I read the concern
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 12:32 AM, Venkat Polisetti
venkat.polise...@gmail.com wrote:
Currently Google does not support hosting Robots on servers other than
the App Engine. In the future it will, I hope.
Set up an XMPP server somewhere for your domain, set up a Wave server
attached to that.
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 10:25 PM, Linc ala...@online.de wrote:
Why not implement a counter or sth. so that you only react on everey
3rd DOCUMENT_CHANGED.
Or some kind of capability saying that it only wants updates once
every 3 seconds, and however many changes occur within those 3 seconds
I would use Ruby, though I know Google hate it.
PHP... eww. PHP is fine for web stuff but for bots it seems wrong. Yes, I
know that currently, Wave robots run as webapps. That also seems wrong.
Why are they not using XMPP so that things can be done over a protocol
designed for real-time? :-|
On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 12:07 PM, Alan Green ☄ alangr...@google.com wrote:
Hi Betty,
This was a product decision that we discussed for quite some time, and
did not make lightly. In the end, we thought there was more benefit
for users in being able to access all Google products with one
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 9:36 AM, Brian May br...@microcomaustralia.com.auwrote:
Sure you didn't mean gmail.com and googlewave.com? The accounts on
wavesandbox.com are not the same.
Honest typo. I was obviously thinking about the sandbox too much, but I
meant googlewave.com. I was wondering
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 11:21 AM, Wayne shalo...@gmail.com wrote:
Why not just support OpenID for accounts? That would provide the same
benefit without building a new identity model.
OpenID doesn't solve the problem, it just replaces one volatile identity
system with another. When you move
