Hi,
i am using loading image for loading process in my project,
when communicating between client and server loading screen shows up
perfectly,
unfortunetly, during code block executions on client side, ( lets say a
code block which takes 2 seconds to process ) the loading screen do not
You probably do too heavy work in your code so that the browser can not
show the loading dialog (your work blocks the only JavaScript thread that
also renders the web page).
You could wrap your heavy work in a Scheduler.get().scheduleDeferred()
which should give the browser enough time to show
13 Şubat 2013 Çarşamba 11:39:36 UTC+2 tarihinde Jens yazdı:
You probably do too heavy work in your code so that the browser can not
show the loading dialog (your work blocks the only JavaScript thread that
also renders the web page).
You could wrap your heavy work in a
Safari on iOS 6/6.1 has some JavaScript bugs that can break your app
randomly on iPad/iPhone.
Take a look
at
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/google-web-toolkit-contributors/O8JFu_D8Gjc/discussion
where I have listed some cross references to iOS 6 issues with Safari.
When you try Google
What I mean is code like
Scheduler.get().scheduleDeferred(. RootPanel.get().add(labelA);
RootPanel.get().add(labelB); ...)
RootPanel.get().add(... labelC...)
will probably result in an UI:
labelC
labelA
labelB
because the deferred command is executed after any other code completes.
But
Thanks for the suggestion - in my particular case though I was looking to
create a JS library. One that didn't touch the DOM at all.
Thus there should be no variations I believe? So I arbitrarily chose
'safari' (As the 'webkit' agent).
Marcos
On Wednesday, February 13, 2013 12:53:26 AM UTC,
13 Şubat 2013 Çarşamba 12:14:50 UTC+2 tarihinde Jens yazdı:
What I mean is code like
Scheduler.get().scheduleDeferred(. RootPanel.get().add(labelA);
RootPanel.get().add(labelB); ...)
RootPanel.get().add(... labelC...)
will probably result in an UI:
labelC
labelA
labelB
because
A late answer (I just had the problem myself):
To get rid of the warning, you have to make sure that the classpath for
running com.google.gwt.dev.Compiler also contains
the compiled annotations (corresponding .class file)
Am Mittwoch, 1. Juni 2011 21:32:56 UTC+2 schrieb randasin:
I have one
Hi guys!
I'm trying to build google web toolkit 2.4; need to try a thing with the
legacy code. I am following the steps in 'Making gwt better', took GWT from
http://google-web-toolkit.googlecode.com/svn/releases/2.4
I am using tools from
http://google-web-toolkit.googlecode.com/svn/tools
Hi again.
I managed to build that with jdk 1.6.
Looks like generic treatment has changed a little from 1.6 to 1.7
Works now like a charm.
Regards,
Alex.
On Wednesday, 13 February 2013 16:12:33 UTC+2, Alexander Cherednichenko
wrote:
Hi guys!
I'm trying to build google web toolkit
Thomas,
I just read the article on how they improved parsing time in flickr ...
really simplistic and a big surprise that the split trick is as fast as
native json parsing!
Would such an approach be usable for a generic object
serialisation/deserialisation approach ?
David
On Wednesday,
I've having trouble understanding the best way to organize my object
relationships and code flow with GWT. I'm finding a few of the examples
leave a lot to be desired and do a poor job illustrating proper usage of
the API (for example why does this
Hy,
I have a problem when I want to use https in gwt:
ERROR: The serialization policy file
'https://localhost:8443/Site/app/42E2AA39BEDF91DF0BC28849CEB69CDB.gwt.rpc'
was not found; did you forget to include it in this deployment?
ERROR: Failed to get the SerializationPolicy
Hi Prakash,
Thanks for the reply: I saw the same error because I'm caching some data in
my cookie (that's the wanted behavior)
Is it normal that all cookie content is sent to the server on each request?
On Monday, September 20, 2010 3:32:49 PM UTC+1, Prakash wrote:
Check your cookies and
At a very high-level I think you need to start with the offline data issue
and define exactly what your requirements are for supporting offline.
- I haven't had a chance to go through all of this but may help
+ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Oic22dQMRXQ
- Also, I think we are in a critical time
Hi everyone,
We're excited to announce the GWT 2.5.1-rc1 release candidate! There will
be an announcement soon on the GWT Bloghttp://googlewebtoolkit.blogspot.com/,
and you can download it
herehttps://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/downloads/detail?name=gwt-2.5.1-rc1.zip.
This release
Any thoughts? Or is this a really stupid question?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post
Hi,
Take a look at the following posts:
- http://kiahu.com/tutorial/generate-a-skeleton-project-using-gwt-and-maven/
- http://kiahu.com/tutorial/debugging-with-gwt-maven-and-eclipse/
- http://kiahu.com/tutorial/working-with-gwt-maven-and-intellij-idea/
-
Fast forward to February 2013, I am having the exact same problem but only
when compiling in dev mode and only if doing so from eclipse...
On Tuesday, July 3, 2012 5:06:38 PM UTC-4, Matthew Wiley wrote:
Thanks for pointing this out. I had the exact same problem.
On Wednesday, December 14,
Hi,
Do you intend to use dependency injection (GIN and Guice)? There is a
discussion re form-factor support is this post:
- http://kiahu.com/tutorial/form-factor-support-with-gin-and-guice/
Are you going to use any third party UI toolkits (GXT, Smart GWT, mgwt)?
There is a discussion re MVP
Which again got resolved by rearranging the project classpath.
Thanks.
On Wednesday, February 13, 2013 4:10:38 PM UTC-5, Reuben S wrote:
Fast forward to February 2013, I am having the exact same problem but only
when compiling in dev mode and only if doing so from eclipse...
On Tuesday,
Its not a stupid question. Other people also stumbled upon this.
On your EventBus a PlaceChangeEvent is fired when you want to switch
places. The ActivityManager listens for this event and calls
Activity.start() on the new activity. That means Activity.start() is called
inside an event
Hi All,
I am trying to integrate Chitika program into my GWT project. Here is
the script:
script type=”text/javascript”
ch_client = “DEMO”;
ch_width = 550;
ch_height = 250;
ch_type = “mpu”;
ch_sid = “Chitika Default”;
ch_backfill = 1;
ch_color_site_link = “cc”;
ch_color_title = “cc”;
Hi,
- GWT (e.g. deferred binding, declarative UI, ...)
- GWTP (MVP, form-factor support), Gin and Guice (dependency injection)
- UI, you have several options: GWT, mgwt (mobile/tablet form-factors), GXT
(desktop form-factor), smart GWT, ...
- Restlet: it has GWT support (as does RestyGWT)
GWT +
On Friday, January 6, 2012 7:27:48 AM UTC-5, Emilian Bold wrote:
I agree. The current GWT pagination seems to be more of a workaround.
They try to avoid having less items on the last page because it might
change the layout and the pager position.
What should actually happen is that the
If you want the table height to remain consistent, couldn't you wrap the
table in a containing element (e.g. div) of a fixed height? That way, if
you display the pager directly underneath the table for example, it will
always stay in the same spot and just the table itself will shrink.
I
After a day of sitting on this I decided to throw out the
AbstractDataProvider implementation I wrote and modify my Activity to
handle RangeChangeEvents itself. Then I manually update the display myself
through accessor methods of the view implementation. Perhaps it was always
meant to be
If you want the table height to remain consistent, couldn't you wrap the
table in a containing element (e.g. div) of a fixed height? That way, if
you display the pager directly underneath the table for example, it will
always stay in the same spot and just the table itself will shrink.
I
If you want the table height to remain consistent, couldn't you wrap the
table in a containing element (e.g. div) of a fixed height? That way, if
you display the pager directly underneath the table for example, it will
always stay in the same spot and just the table itself will shrink.
I
Am Freitag, 8. Februar 2013 21:21:00 UTC+1 schrieb John A. Tamplin:
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 3:02 PM, Jens jens.ne...@gmail.com
javascript:wrote:
Also an option but one of the main problems I had while trying to rewrite
a++ was that I couldn't figure out how to change operator precedence.
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 5:02 AM, Jens jens.nehlme...@gmail.com wrote:
Am Freitag, 8. Februar 2013 21:21:00 UTC+1 schrieb John A. Tamplin:
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 3:02 PM, Jens jens.ne...@gmail.com wrote:
Also an option but one of the main problems I had while trying to
rewrite a++ was that
b.$f = (a = a + a, a - 1);
Typo: b.$f = (a = a + 1, a - 1);
--
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit Contributors group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop
Ok I have tried it again but replacing a++ with Roberto's version only
solves some issues. Also tried to replace ++a, a-- and --a using the
corresponding replacement strategy but some issues still remain. So its not
a viable solution.
To make our app run reliably on Safari 6 we have to stick
Goktug Gokdogan has abandoned this change.
Change subject: Enables wrapping of un-serializable exceptions in web mode.
..
Abandoned
Submitted
--
To view, visit https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/1890
To unsubscribe, visit
Goktug Gokdogan has abandoned this change.
Change subject: Prevents GWTTestCase to become zombie when communication
with backend fails.
..
Abandoned
Submitted
--
To view, visit https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/1880
To
Just bear in mind that a++ == (a = a + 1, a -1) only if a does not have
side effects (which I suspect is always the case but I am not sure).
Roberto Lublinerman | Software Engineer | rlu...@google.com | 408-500-9148
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 3:23 AM, Jens jens.nehlme...@gmail.com wrote:
b.$f
Matthew Dempsky has posted comments on this change.
Change subject: Introduce ImmutableAnnotations to reduce memory usage.
..
Patch Set 2: Code-Review+1
--
To view, visit https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/1920
To
Roberto Lublinerman has uploaded a new change for review.
https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/1930
Change subject: Makes JsInliner run on functions that are JSNI or that
contain JSNI calls (not on the whole AST).
..
Roberto Lublinerman has uploaded a new patch set (#2).
Change subject: Run JsInliner only on methods that are JSNI or that contain
JSNI calls (not on the whole AST).
..
Run JsInliner only on methods that are JSNI or that
Roberto Lublinerman has uploaded a new patch set (#3).
Change subject: Run JsInliner only on methods that are JSNI or that contain
JSNI calls (not on the whole AST).
..
Run JsInliner only on methods that are JSNI or that
Roberto Lublinerman has uploaded a new patch set (#4).
Change subject: Run JsInliner only on methods that are JSNI or that contain
JSNI calls (not on the whole AST).
..
Run JsInliner only on methods that are JSNI or that
Ray Cromwell has posted comments on this change.
Change subject: Run JsInliner only on methods that are JSNI or that contain
JSNI calls (not on the whole AST).
..
Patch Set 4: Code-Review+1
(3 comments)
Any data on
Hello Ray Cromwell,
I'd like you to reexamine a change. Please visit
https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/1930
to look at the new patch set (#5).
Change subject: Run JsInliner only on methods that are JSNI or that contain
JSNI calls (not on the whole AST).
Roberto Lublinerman has posted comments on this change.
Change subject: Run JsInliner only on methods that are JSNI or that contain
JSNI calls (not on the whole AST).
..
Patch Set 4:
(3 comments)
I have measured the
Goktug Gokdogan has uploaded a new change for review.
https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/1940
Change subject: Adds test cases for uncaught exception handling in
GWTTestCase.
..
Adds test cases for uncaught exception
John A. Tamplin has posted comments on this change.
Change subject: Run JsInliner only on methods that are JSNI or that contain
JSNI calls (not on the whole AST).
..
Patch Set 5:
There are tests internally that measure
46 matches
Mail list logo
