Hello Brian, thanks for your answer.
I tested the Showcase sample from the 2.5.1 GA bundle and the issue is the
same. SDM works well for me. Here is my compilation result which states
that source maps are well enabled :
Compiling 1 permutation
Compiling permutation 0...
Source
I'm not deployng the app...
the error comes in compile time.
Deleting the servletcontext.class in the jar resolved the problem
2013/5/21 Thomas Broyer t.bro...@gmail.com
On Monday, May 20, 2013 10:27:17 AM UTC+2, gabriele.prandini wrote:
I'm using GWT (2.5.0) with grails (www.grails.org)
During compilation you have a servlet 3.0 vs. servlet 2.5 (which is
embedded in gwt-user.jar/gwt-servlet.jar) mismatch. Make sure you have
servlet 3.0 api on classpath before gwt-user.jar.
-- J.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit
On Tuesday, May 21, 2013 10:30:44 AM UTC+2, gabriele.prandini wrote:
I'm not deployng the app...
the error comes in compile time.
Er, you're running Tomcat at compile-time? (or is the blog you linked to
actually unrelated to your issue?)
Deleting the servletcontext.class in the jar
I don't know what is your problem, but try
https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups#!topic/google-web-toolkit/78Hl47eFPKw
.
2013/5/21 Martones ludovit.marton...@gmail.com
Hello Brian, thanks for your answer.
I tested the Showcase sample from the 2.5.1 GA bundle and the issue is the
same.
Thanks Jens, i thik the problem is what you explain
2013/5/21 Thomas Broyer t.bro...@gmail.com
On Tuesday, May 21, 2013 10:30:44 AM UTC+2, gabriele.prandini wrote:
I'm not deployng the app...
the error comes in compile time.
Er, you're running Tomcat at compile-time? (or is the blog
Dear GWT developers,
I have a probably simple problem with my application which I am obviously
not able to solve.
Two Classes: Company, Tradesman
@Entity
public class Company {
@OneToMany(cascade = CascadeType.ALL, mappedBy = company)
private ListTradesman users = new
On Tuesday, May 21, 2013 11:18:42 AM UTC+2, Nermin wrote:
Dear GWT developers,
I have a probably simple problem with my application which I am
obviously not able to solve.
Two Classes: Company, Tradesman
@Entity
public class Company {
@OneToMany(cascade = CascadeType.ALL,
Update your entity as:
@Entity
public class Tradesman extends User{
@ManyToOne(optional=false)
private Company company;
*@PrePersist*
public void hashPassword(){
setPassword(BCrypt.hashpw(**entity.getPassword(), BCrypt.gensalt());
}
And then check where are you
Dear Juan,
I tried *@ManyToOne(optional=false)*, unfortunately no changes.
In my current setting, the @PrePersist is called only once. (I see it on
system out) That means: no multiple attempts to persist Tradesman entity.
However, it looks to me that whenever I change parameters on the
GWT Release: 2.5.0
Browser: IE9
Our clients have a problem using our web application because, on IE9, when the
application shows a message (i.e., to confirm if a file is uploaded or not),
the focus
remains behind the message shown and it is impossible to interact with the
message, so you
You should persist company before persist Tradesman or attach to an
existent company. This relation should be explicit. Create
company.addTrademan(Trademan t) method:
company.addTrademan(Trademan t){
users.add(t);
t.setCompany(this);
}
Call this in a transactional method.
Juan
2013/5/21
How do you show messages?
2013/5/21 Mike miguelaz9...@gmail.com
GWT Release: 2.5.0
Browser: IE9
Our clients have a problem using our web application because, on IE9, when
the application shows a message (i.e., to confirm if a file is uploaded or
not), the focus
remains behind the
I just ran into the same issue. As there is no way to get or change the
SimpleRequestProcessor im stuck now! Have you found out anything more,
Michael Wiles?
Am Mittwoch, 27. März 2013 10:52:24 UTC+1 schrieb Michael Wiles:
I'm using GWT 2.5.0 and Request Factory.
I have configured a
Typically you would have a Presenter that initializes your view ( the
static dom) , loads your view with data from an async server invocation ,
and receives requests from the view for more data . Have a look at
https://developers.google.com/web-toolkit/articles/mvp-architecture-2.
Apart
By default, GWT calls validator.validate(domain) in
ReflectiveServiceLayer.validate(), but you probably want
if(domain.getId() == null) {
return validator.validate(domain, CreateGroup.class);
}
return validator.validate(domain, Server/DefaultGroup.class);
You can do this by providing a
I tryed to reinstall the bookmark, this didnt help. But thanks for your tip
;)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to
If you display the message in DialogBox (or PopupPanel), are you displaying
glass to darken the window? If so doesn't the glass overlap your message?
It could be a problem of layouting, are you using multiple z-orders in your
app? These issues should be easy to figure out in developer tools
Thanks for your answer!
Well...propably I'm abusing bean validation (?), but in my case that
doesn't help (actually I'm already doing it like this with different
groups).
I'll try to explain my problem:
Basically I've got two validation groups which both should be run on the
server-side:
From the point of view of RF, these are just an exception thrown by the
service method, like any other.
If you want to communicate failure to your client with specific
information, then you have to make your service method return a response
object containing the status (success/failure) and the
Or use a cascade persist, merge to force creation or merge respectively
Sent from my iPhone
On May 21, 2013, at 7:02 AM, Juan Pablo Gardella gardellajuanpa...@gmail.com
wrote:
You should persist company before persist Tradesman or attach to an existent
company. This relation should be
On Monday, May 20, 2013 2:14:42 PM UTC-4, Goktug Gokdogan wrote:
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 6:42 AM, Thad thad.hu...@gmail.com
javascript:wrote:
Can anyone clarify for me this Google testing blog entry?
http://googletesting.blogspot.com/2009/08/tott-testing-gwt-without-gwttest.html
Yes hosted.html is included in the CACHE section of the manifest.
I don't have a devmode.js file.
Yves
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to
I am also in the process of making GWT-RPC method implementation
independent of GWT-RPC/Servlet for easier testing. I don't really bother
about introducing new short lived objects created for each request. Short
living objects are not a real problem in todays JVMs and you can probably
save a
I have a cell that contains some text. I would like to create links within
the text that are clickable.
For, example abc and xyz should be links.
I figured on using InlineLabel to create the links within the text.
However, since the whole thing is a cell I can't click on the individual
Early on in the presentation Erik also mentions a recently released GWT
Mockito setup that might benefit your non-GwtTestCase goals.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kilmaSRq49g
Sincerely,
Joseph
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit
Hi Ahmed,
Yes the problem was the hosting company did not support GWT. I now use
arvixe.com which works fine.
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/9691609/gwt-servlet-error-com-google-gwt-user-client-rpc-statuscodeexception-404-on-to
Good luck
On Monday, May 20, 2013 1:17:58 PM UTC-6, Ahmed
you mean no body has done this before?
On Thursday, May 16, 2013 11:23:02 AM UTC-7, bhomass wrote:
I have been using GWT native Dnd successfully.
Now I have a need to create Dnd group. This means if Widget A and panel B
are in the same group, I want to allow user to drag A into B. C and D
Daniel Kurka has uploaded a new change for review.
https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/2861
Change subject: fixed a typo in StringBuilder
..
fixed a typo in StringBuilder
Change-Id:
Matthew Dempsky has posted comments on this change.
Change subject: fixed a typo in StringBuilder
..
Patch Set 1: Code-Review+1
Hah, LGTM
But please make the commit message more descriptive like: Fix typo in
method name:
Thomas Broyer has posted comments on this change.
Change subject: fixed a typo in StringBuilder
..
Patch Set 1: Code-Review+2
(1 comment)
Commit Message
Line 7: fixed a
Thomas Broyer has posted comments on this change.
Change subject: Introduces generic Composite widgets.
..
Patch Set 3:
(1 comment)
I'd vote for removing FocusComposite from this change, to get it merged
early, and adding
Daniel Kurka has submitted this change and it was merged.
Change subject: fixed a typo in StringBuilder
..
fixed a typo in StringBuilder
Change-Id: I640d45e056d90794648a73f7d5546c520d4a41df
---
M
John Ahlroos has uploaded a new change for review.
https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/2900
Change subject: Use JSON.parse() instead of eval() to deserialize rpc
callback payload
..
Use JSON.parse() instead of eval() to
Thomas Broyer has posted comments on this change.
Change subject: Use JSON.parse() instead of eval() to deserialize rpc
callback payload
..
Patch Set 1: Code-Review-2
(2 comments)
AFAICT, this change is kind of useless
Thomas Broyer has posted comments on this change.
Change subject: Use JSON.parse() instead of eval() to deserialize rpc
callback payload
..
Patch Set 1:
Brian, I added you as a reviewer as you're the author of the RPC
Colin Alworth has posted comments on this change.
Change subject: Use JSON.parse() instead of eval() to deserialize rpc
callback payload
..
Patch Set 1:
(1 comment)
The ServerSerializationStreamWriter will also need
John Ahlroos has posted comments on this change.
Change subject: Use JSON.parse() instead of eval() to deserialize rpc
callback payload
..
Patch Set 1:
(2 comments)
Hello Leeroy Jenkins, Thomas Broyer,
I'd like you to reexamine a change. Please visit
https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/2900
to look at the new patch set (#2).
Change subject: Use JSON.parse() instead of eval() to deserialize rpc
callback payload
John Ahlroos has posted comments on this change.
Change subject: Use JSON.parse() instead of eval() to deserialize rpc
callback payload
..
Patch Set 2:
Removed the protocol version for now since it will cause a lot of work
Thomas Broyer has posted comments on this change.
Change subject: Use JSON.parse() instead of eval() to deserialize rpc
callback payload
..
Patch Set 2:
(1 comment)
As Colin said, this change is not backwards-compatible
Manuel Carrasco Moñino has posted comments on this change.
Change subject: working on issue 8063, ie10 permutation and ms pointer
events
..
Patch Set 2: Code-Review+1
(4 comments)
That actually sounds promising. This may be a dumb question but can anyone
think of a way to slave the WebDriver and JUNIT together? All I really need
is to run a JDBC query or a RPC command before each test runs. As long as I
can get the DB into a known state before running each test all my
It is slightly redundant, but I think it's nice to keep the option open to
create other foo-discuss or bar-contrib mailing lists if the project grows and
splits into independent subprojects.
True; I like being optimistic about future growth. :-)
But I'd also like to avoid the name gwt-users
That actually sounds promising. This may be a dumb question but can anyone
think of a way to slave the WebDriver and JUNIT together?
Take a look at:
http://nadimsaker.blogspot.de/2011/10/how-to-run-selenium-webdriver-code-with.html
Before setting up WebDriver in the setUp() method you
Roberto Lublinerman has uploaded a new change for review.
https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/2881
Change subject: Lint errors
..
Lint errors
Change-Id: I62cc493c7324d42bf6fa36085007cbd59e87933a
---
M
Roberto Lublinerman has abandoned this change.
Change subject: Lint errors
..
Abandoned
Pushed in error.
--
To view, visit https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/2881
To unsubscribe, visit
Hello Leeroy Jenkins,
I'd like you to reexamine a change. Please visit
https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/2910
to look at the new patch set (#2).
Change subject: Chooses a default gwt source level to match the current
java runtime.
Matthew Dempsky has posted comments on this change.
Change subject: Chooses a default gwt source level to match the current
java runtime.
..
Patch Set 1:
(1 comment)
Roberto Lublinerman has posted comments on this change.
Change subject: Chooses a default gwt source level to match the current
java runtime.
..
Patch Set 2:
I just noticed that the ApiChecker fails if you are running with
Matthew Dempsky has posted comments on this change.
Change subject: Chooses a default gwt source level to match the current
java runtime.
..
Patch Set 2:
The code should still compile the same as before with either JDK6 or
Roberto Lublinerman has posted comments on this change.
Change subject: Chooses a default gwt source level to match the current
java runtime.
..
Patch Set 1:
(1 comment)
Hello Leeroy Jenkins,
I'd like you to reexamine a change. Please visit
https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/2910
to look at the new patch set (#3).
Change subject: Chooses a default GWT source level to match the current
java runtime.
Matthew Dempsky has posted comments on this change.
Change subject: Chooses a default GWT source level to match the current
java runtime.
..
Patch Set 3:
(1 comment)
Brian Slesinsky has posted comments on this change.
Change subject: Use JSON.parse() instead of eval() to deserialize rpc
callback payload
..
Patch Set 2:
Haven't looked at the code yet, but it seems like we should rev the
Goktug Gokdogan has posted comments on this change.
Change subject: Introduces generic Composite widgets.
..
Patch Set 3:
(1 comment)
Agreed. The patch is growing; I will take the FocusComposite and
PanelComposite out but
Jens Nehlmeier has posted comments on this change.
Change subject: Introduces generic Composite widgets.
..
Patch Set 4:
I have once written a widget that does this
foo.getDelegate().addXyzHandler() style but it comes with
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 2:13 AM, Mohammad Al-Quraian m4des...@gmail.comwrote:
I want to try and help improve GWT, and I was wondering if that is
possible. I noticed for instance in the Simple Pager, the words are still
in English even when the selected locale is Arabic.
That particular
Brian Slesinsky has posted comments on this change.
Change subject: Introduces generic Composite widgets.
..
Patch Set 4:
Fair enough, it has to work with UiBinder. Though I suppose UiBinder could
check for a delegate (or
Goktug Gokdogan has posted comments on this change.
Change subject: Introduces generic Composite widgets.
..
Patch Set 4:
It doesn't work with UIBinder because you are changing the expected
semantics of a widget. So even
Brian Slesinsky has posted comments on this change.
Change subject: Introduces generic Composite widgets.
..
Patch Set 4:
Fair enough - I don't understand the particular use cases. My point is that
we should make sure they
Hello Leeroy Jenkins,
I'd like you to reexamine a change. Please visit
https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/2910
to look at the new patch set (#4).
Change subject: Chooses a default GWT source level to match the current
java runtime.
Roberto Lublinerman has posted comments on this change.
Change subject: Chooses a default GWT source level to match the current
java runtime.
..
Patch Set 3:
(1 comment)
Goktug Gokdogan has posted comments on this change.
Change subject: Introduces generic Composite widgets.
..
Patch Set 4:
I played with a separate method but I didn't find something I like.
Actually, I quite like our
Brian Slesinsky has submitted this change and it was merged.
Change subject: Including the module name in the magic sourceURL comment in
code generated by the iframe linker. This gives a bit more context in the
browser debugger, and is especially important when including multiple GWT
Brian Slesinsky has posted comments on this change.
Change subject: Introduces generic Composite widgets.
..
Patch Set 4:
It might be possible to intercept the events and update the source after
they're generated:
class
Goktug Gokdogan has posted comments on this change.
Change subject: Introduces generic Composite widgets.
..
Patch Set 4:
This looks like exactly what I have proposed; you might have missed some of
the discussion.
It is
67 matches
Mail list logo
