Re: GWT React

2016-04-13 Thread Debasish Padhy
Hi Paul, Is there a possibility of you sharing the codebase over github and put a license to it ? I have been working extensively with JsInterOp / TypeScript cross usage and find your POC interesting and would love to contribute if its with an open license. thanks, Debasish On Thursday,

Re: [gwt-contrib] GWT compiler optimization breaks some lambdas

2016-04-13 Thread Ignacio Baca Moreno-Torres
(just in case someone read this thread) This problem has already been fixed in 2.8.0-SNAPSHOT. Thanks. On Tuesday, October 27, 2015 at 9:17:47 PM UTC+1, Ignacio Baca Moreno-Torres wrote: > > At last! >

Re: Help running DevMode with GWT 2.7 and no bookmarklets

2016-04-13 Thread Thomas Broyer
-launcherDir's equivalent for DevMode is -war and is not optional. If you use DevMode with -noserver then it's equivalent to using CodeServer with -launcherDir. You're otherwise right. Just a note: for people coming from "legacy DevMode" in 2.6, 2.7 didn't change anything, except their

Re: Help running DevMode with GWT 2.7 and no bookmarklets

2016-04-13 Thread shaun . tarves
Hi Thomas - That was the missing piece. I can now get the automatic re-compile on browser refresh. However, the launcherDir parameter is only available in the gwt-maven-plugin:run-codeserver mojo. Doesn't that start Super Dev Mode directly? I thought that *wasn't* the correct way to do things

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: JsInterop is pruning non readed properties

2016-04-13 Thread 'Goktug Gokdogan' via GWT Contributors
Unfortunately, that is not true. A lot of people just need to deal with native types without any need for exporting their own types to JavaScript and shared libraries will start accumulating unnecessary code for all of them if it is enabled by default. We have already seen this Google. Actually

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: JsInterop is pruning non readed properties

2016-04-13 Thread Paul Stockley
I agree that if you disable exports you can run into the same problem. However, I would guess most GWT users would have no reason to turn it off and in that case it would be consistent. It seems more an optimization for a use case most people won't have. On Tuesday, April 12, 2016 at 12:51:12

Re: Upgrade validation-api dependency to 1.1.0.Final

2016-04-13 Thread Thomas Broyer
Nobody maintains the JSR303 emulation. Someone (Danilo) once volunteered, started working on the upgrade, and then disappeared. If you don't use client-side validation then you can compile with javax.validation 1.0 and run with 1.1. The problem then is setting up those rules in your build, and