Re: Unchanged transient field received as null on server using RequestFactory - how to force to send?

Ah, ok - I didn't realize that I was able to provide my own modification of the locator method. In my debugging of our code, I saw the RF framework do a direct to an EntityManager.find() method. For some reason I didn't see that this was something we could modify. I also wasn't aware of

Re: Bazel rules now available for GWT

Ah, I found one here. https://github.com/bazelbuild/rules_gwt/tree/master/example/src/main/java/io/bazel/sample On Friday, October 28, 2016 at 12:25:00 AM UTC+2, Kirill Prazdnikov wrote: > > Hi, this sounds interesting. > are you planning to add an example ? > I was looking here, but did not

Re: Bazel rules now available for GWT

Hi, this sounds interesting. are you planning to add an example ? I was looking here, but did not found one https://github.com/bazelbuild/bazel/tree/master/examples -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group

unsetting draggable

I have a widget that I set draggable with widget.getElement().setDraggable(Element.DRAGGABLE_TRUE); and register a DragStartHandler. Later there comes a time when I want to unregister the handler, as well as disable dragging with

unsetting draggable

I have a widget that I set draggable with widget.getElement().setDraggable(Element.DRAGGABLE_TRUE); and register a DragStartHandler. Later there comes a time when I want to unregister the handler and disable dragging with widget.getElement().setDraggable(Element.DRAGGABLE_FALSE); However

Re: GWT 2.8.0 released

The doc/javadoc directory is incomplete. It is missing the index.html and the other files to complete it. Will these be added to the gwt-2.8.0.zip? On Friday, October 21, 2016 at 3:21:41 PM UTC-4, Daniel Kurka wrote: > > Hi all, > > I am very happy to announce GWT 2.8.0 on behalf of the GWT

Re: Unchanged transient field received as null on server using RequestFactory - how to force to send?

> But when RF looks up the current value to compare, it will always be null > because the regular lookup doesn't set the transient value. > RF expects a correctly filled entity after loading it from the DB using the entity locator methods (because RF only sends changed data). It's your job

Bazel rules now available for GWT

In case anyone is looking into using Bazel as part of a GWT project, there are now some simple GWT rules available in the Bazel repositories at https://github.com/bazelbuild/rules_gwt. These rules have been updated to support GWT 2.8 and define a build target that

Compiler error

Hi, I have a static method public class PolygonEditor { public static void create(PropertyInspector inspector) { PropertyInspector.PropertyRollup rollup = inspector.createRollup("PolygonEditor"); rollup.addButton("switch water on selected", () -> { Logger.log("string");

Re: Unchanged transient field received as null on server using RequestFactory - how to force to send?

... or maybe an improvement, whereby fields marked @Transient would always be sent, and not use the usual lookup/compare workflow? I'm surprised it works the way it does - when the original value is fetched, we set the @Transient values when returned to the client. But when RF looks up the

Re: Unchanged transient field received as null on server using RequestFactory - how to force to send?

Sorry, yes, it was an EntityProxy. My ideas to solve it were: 1) Use a ValueProxy instead of an EntityProxy 2) Use a ValueProxy for the @Transient String value (dunno how a transient value, expressed as a ValueProxy within an EntityProxy, would be handled, or if it's allowed) 3) Pass the

Re: Google Plugin for Eclipse Mars

I'm not sure why the SDBG plugin failed to install. Those artifacts come from another repo. I would try again. On Thursday, October 27, 2016 at 5:06:54 AM UTC-7, Thomas Lacroix wrote: > > > Le mercredi 26 octobre 2016 19:47:13 UTC+2, Brandon Donnelson a écrit : >> >> If you're looking for the

Re: Google Plugin for Eclipse Mars

On Thursday, October 27, 2016 at 7:31:24 AM UTC-7, Alain wrote: > > To get this straight- We now have 2 plugins for Google stuff ? > - The GWT Eclipse Plugin or GWT Features is no longer the responsibility of Google, it has gone open source. They are and have helped with the GWT Eclipse

Re: Google Plugin for Eclipse Mars

To get this straight- We now have 2 plugins for Google stuff ? The GWT plugin and that Cloud Platform Plugin ? On 27 October 2016 at 16:28, Brandon Donnelson wrote: > The GWT Eclipse Plugin doesn't have the App Engine features, but the new > Official Google Cloud Tools

Re: Google Plugin for Eclipse Mars

Le mercredi 26 octobre 2016 19:47:13 UTC+2, Brandon Donnelson a écrit : > > If you're looking for the GWT features, use this plugin instead. It is has > replaced the GPE plugin. > > https://marketplace.eclipse.org/content/gwt-eclipse-plugin > Hello, I tried installing the GWT Eclipse Plugin

Re: How to get ride of gwt theme css

If you don't want to use GWT theme then comment the GWT theme from module.gwt.xml The above 3 default theme will come with GWT application. Comment this if you don't want to include. On Wednesday, October 26, 2016 at 5:39:40 AM UTC+5:30, David wrote: > > In my current project, I just use

Re: Google Plugin for Eclipse Mars

Thanks for the info. What about the Google App Engine integration? Il giorno mar 18 ott 2016 alle ore 17:16 Brandon Donnelson < branflake2...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > Michael is right, GPE and GPE fork is deprecated. > > - GPE is deprecated (or will be in 4th quarter) > - The new GWT Eclipse

My GWT 2.8 app stopped working with Chrome 54 (timers not working anymore)

hi, My Chrome updated yesterday from version 53 to 54 and this made my GWT 2.8 app stop working. There is no error message in the console but after some investigation, I noticed that the problem come from the timers which are not called anymore (whatever the method: GWT Timer / Elemental2 /

Re: Closure compiler and GWT 2.8.0

On Wednesday, October 26, 2016 at 11:21:02 PM UTC+2, Slava Pankov wrote: > > Integrated closure compiler was removed in 2.8.0 > So now I'm trying to use external (post-processing) call to closure > compiler. > SIMPLE mode is working just fine, but gives no improvement over standard > GWT

Unchanged transient field received as null on server using RequestFactory - how to force to send?

Assuming an EntityProxy here, if the field is left unchanged, then it's not sent to the server. On the server side, the entity is loaded by the Locator and then the diff is applied. So if the Locator gets a null field, it'll be left null. You may have to use a ValueProxy here… -- You received