The framework is very elementary, and lacks one of spring's most important
feature: ioc container.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
try to use classes first, but you can definitely use interfaces. there are a
couple of considerations:
1 interfaces must extend Serializable
2 those interfaces must be found by gwt rpc generator, so place them in one of
the source imports of gwt module
3 implementations of these interfaces must
Yes, something like that. I'll submit my findings here (as I haven't found
any thread similar).
Thanks
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
Hi guys, as I'm starting to learn about gwt editors, I find it difficult to
express *one particular concern*: the ability to edit a list of items.
Let's say I have:
Article {
ListString tags = new ArrayListString();
String title;
String text;
}
Now, the overall editor for the
I have looked over the possible editors before coming here, and I was
hoping for a bit more detailed answer.
A ListEditor was my first guess too, but then, I had to supply an editor
for String (3rd generics type): ListEditor String, *EditorString* ...
that I still have to supply. Another
I assume you mean com.google.web.bindery.event.shared.EventH ? In true,
GwtEvent is a specialized EventH bound to Gwt and its event handling
mechanism (XEventHandler, HasXHandlers, EventBus, etc).
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit
Your login place should have a 'redirectAfterLogin' String member, like
this:
class LoginPlace extends Place {
String redirectAfterLogin;
}
Optionally, you could go for, this is closely bound to GWT specific
implementation:
class LoginPlace extends Place {
Place redirectAfterLogin;
}
--
I can understand your point of view (having some generalized/simplified way
to use storage + RPC), but I would not do that. Internal data-structure
could change between versions, and you need a way to inject the data at
the bottom-level of RPC mechanism (right when the bytes get off wire).
My
Are you sure you need a generic RemoteService? Like Jeff stated, RPC
proxyCreator needs to ensure all subtypes of the types specified in your
RemoteService need to be serialized (that way, server client can
communicate without problems). This will bloat the size of generated code.
Moreover,
You should not build your Ginjector until you read user role/permissions.
App {
show_some_loading_ui ();
rpc_get_user_and_permissions (callback {
success (..) {
// hide some_loading_ui.
// use a DeferredCommand to load the app (#see onModuleLoad2 -P).
}
failure (..) {
I would go with DTO. From your post, I get that you don't want lazy-load --
if that's so, why don't you disable it?
http://docs.jboss.org/hibernate/core/3.3/reference/en/html/performance.html#performance-fetching
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Hi guys,
like the subject states, for testing purposes I want to create and compile
new classes at runtime, using generators (similar to what deferred binding
does, only programmatic).
I have an instance of a generator (doesn't matter which one), and I want to
invoke codegenerate(...)/code.
IMO You should not do unit testing for views. All you could test is what,
that they look ok? Or they respond to app events? Or rather generate an app
event, based on user input? While those cases are indeed valid, testing them
by hand is very very easy. You should however have a
Thanks Thomas, I'll have a look.
But, I'm not interested in how GWT tests its own generators. Anyway I
think you got my point.
Alex.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
One thing you should know about unit testing the client code (gwt) of your
project is that it's *very very slow*. See more
herehttp://code.google.com/webtoolkit/doc/latest/DevGuideTesting.html
.
If you're new to unit testing (or only junit?), then I'd recommend writing
some tests for a pure
What are you trying to do exactly? Setting the upFace of a PushButton?
Then go with
{{{
g:PushButton ui:field=button
upFace={img.button} /
}}}
(not sure highlight will work)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To
If you're using a KeyUp/Down/Press/Handler, are you getting this too?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/JM6ljZ5lKJoJ.
To post to
What isn't working -- upload (you don't see the call), server processing,
there isn't any response?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
Hello guys,
I was going through the UiBinder docs (
http://code.google.com/webtoolkit/doc/latest/DevGuideUiBinder.html#Using_a_widget),
and I was wondering if you could have a nested view, like this:
interface Header *extends IsWidget* {
// have some methods here, not important
}
class
That looks right. Thanks, Jens.
Is there any release version that will include this patch (anyone)?
Except that, looks like I'll compile the source code from svn.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To view this discussion on
http://code.google.com/webtoolkit/doc/1.6/DevGuideServerCommunication.html#DevGuideSerializableTypes
If you have an ArrayListA, is A implementing Serializable? Also, the data
types need to be gwt-translatable. This means you cannot (de)serialialize a
domain object, that keeps references to
You're really not showing us the code.
Please follow the guidelines then, and check one by one.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
I'd suggest you first write a unit test that checks if your data types are
actually valid (say, persist some, delete some, etc). This test will only
run for 0.5-1s, so it's really fast.
Then, you should know that GWT cannot send everything through the wire (from
server to client). The *Key*
The message from GWT is a warning -- you can safely ignore it, as long as
you stick with the configuration (those specific JRE/GWT versions).
2nd, I have no idea about websphere, but I find it very weird to not be
compatible with java6;
lastly, the UnsupportedClassVersionError happens because
read docs?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/_2tOBZDxqGwJ.
To post to this group, send email to
BM, can you create an empty project and copy those files (service, service
async, server impl, etc) run it?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
http://code.google.com/web/ajaxcrawling/docs/getting-started.html
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/eSyQbMFsHaQJ.
To post to this
I just saw you already posted this link, sorry for that.
As far as it goes, you're basically running Javascript code, in a
(simple-to-complex) app, inside client code (browser sandbox). I don't how
crawling such an app would be straightforward.
--
You received this message because you are
So you want to have a single app (your dashboard, but independently develop
each game as a totally separated gwt app, is that right? Total flexibility,
no?
First, there have been countless questions about how to communicate between
2 (supposedly) independent GWT apps.
Secondly, this design,
29 matches
Mail list logo