This is a critical problem - the plugin simply removes the .svn directories,
completely messing up the entire workspace - everything below webapp is now
unversioned and shown to be committed. Is there any feedback on this?
Thanks.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to
Something like that, yes.
Where should the '-war foldername' be specified?
I do indeed have it active on my run configurations, but the actual Eclipse
builder that's running in the background is the one that is likely
responsible with the removal of the svn dirs. I also have the war directory
when
you upgrade your plugin, so you'll have to correct it by hand.
Hope this can be helpful.
Regards
Lorenzo
On Aug 4, 10:47 am, Eugen Paraschiv hanrisel...@gmail.com wrote:
Something like that, yes.
Where should the '-war foldername' be specified?
I do indeed have it active on my run
About the war option, I am using it, only I was pointing it to my actual war
directory and not a temporary one.
Thanks for the help.
Eugen.
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 12:12 PM, Michael Vogt vmei...@googlemail.comwrote:
Something like that, yes.
Where should the '-war foldername' be specified?
I'm trying to write a Selenium test for some UI code involving a CellTree; I
have done ensureDebugId on the CellTree, half expecting it to propagate id's
for it's children, as other widgets do. This doesn't seem to happen, so I'm
left wondering if this is by design or just missing because the
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=6586
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/BIhQlf71hHAJ.
To post to this
UTC+2, Eugen Paraschiv wrote:
Yes, I am aware that if I don't include the tokenizer in the mapping, it
works fine. The problem with that is that it's an all or nothing solution,
whereas I'm looking for a programatic way of choosing when the navigation
should add a new history item and when
, July 8, 2011 4:46 PM
*Subject:* Re: Aw: Is it possible to go to a new Place without inserting a
new history item?
On Thursday, July 7, 2011 5:46:44 PM UTC+2, Eugen Paraschiv wrote:
Yes, I am aware that if I don't include the tokenizer in the mapping, it
works fine. The problem
Good point about the user experience - it does have a potentially high
degree of inconsistency if I make abc:null select the first entry, same as
abc:1 this time and abc:2 the next. I will do as you suggest, abc:null will
select nothing, and it will be up to the user to actually select something
To answer some of your feedback - there is a single Activity for the entire
page. About the calculation of the URL, the reason behind URL recalculation
each time was to be able to navigate to abc:id directly and bypass the
entire problem with first going to abc:null and handling that scenario.
I'm trying to do a place change but avoid introducing a new history item. My
current code is:
placeController.goTo(new ABCPlace(null));
which does trigger a:
HistoryImpl.newItem
I have searched the various discussions about changes in place navigation
and such but found no answer on how to do
I have run into the same issue. It is true the tokenizer is not added to the
mapper, than it works, only that means that I'm forced to go with a all or
nothing approach. What I would be interested in is to be able to
programatically decide when to trigger a history item addition and when not
Yes, I am aware that if I don't include the tokenizer in the mapping, it
works fine. The problem with that is that it's an all or nothing solution,
whereas I'm looking for a programatic way of choosing when the navigation
should add a new history item and when it should not. It seems to be a
Thanks for taking the time to go into this. I will go with the custom
historian and see how that pans out. The id of the first item is indeed
variable.
Thanks again for the suggestions.
On Jul 7, 2011 6:23 PM, Jens jens.nehlme...@gmail.com wrote:
--
You received this message because you are
I have a button with 2 ClickHandlers. After the first handler executes, I
would like to cancel the event, so that it doesn't reach the second handler
(based on some internal logic). Is there any way to cancel an event at this
point?
I have tried: event.stopPropagation(); but it has no effect.
this is GWT code (and the default behavior for any entity firing events), I
don't have that option.
Thanks for the feedback.
Eugen.
On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 5:28 PM, Jeffrey Chimene jchim...@gmail.com wrote:
On 7/4/2011 3:45 AM, Eugen Paraschiv wrote:
I have a button with 2 ClickHandlers. After
My logic was split with the purpose of decoupling two unrelated
functionalities, but seeing how there is no way to do what I was trying to
do, I created a custom event for one of the 2 functionalities. What could
help though is to add a field to the ClickEvent, settable from the outside,
so that
Adding the validation-api to the classpath now results in
javax.validation.ValidationException: Unable to find a default provider
I do have gwt-servlet on the classpath as well, but it seems that without
something like hibernate-validator (which is a provider), it doesn't find
one.
Any
Including the 2 depenencies without a validation provider doesn't seem
right. You also need a provider, otherwise:
javax.validation.ValidationException: Unable to find a default provider.
Any ideas on how to solve this? (besides actually including a provider just
to be able to run gwt).
I have indeed added it to the classpath, but the HibernateValidator.gwt.xml
module is nowhere to be found.
Thanks for the feedback.
Eugen.
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 6:47 PM, Nick Chalko ncha...@google.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 7:09 AM, Eugen Paraschiv hanrisel...@gmail.comwrote
Saw it there. Ok so until 2.4 what is the recommended way of doing
validation?
On Jun 30, 2011 5:55 PM, Nick Chalko ncha...@google.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 8:50 AM, Eugen Paraschiv hanrisel...@gmail.com
wrote:
I have indeed added it to the classpath, but the
HibernateValidator.gwt.xml
I just ran into the exact same thing, where I was setting the acceptable
values without explicitly setting a value first - null is added to the list.
I understand the fix, but this seems to be an issue - if no value is set,
then it would make sense to have a way to skip the adding of the null -
I'm experiencing the following behavior: I have a ValueListBox (in a
FlexTable) which has the height double that of the other widgets. I can see
that the ValueListBox is a select element and also that it has a padding
of 4px (which adds a little to the height as well). Is this the expected
Hi, I have the exact same problem, but using a *ProvidesKey *doesn't seem to
change anything; this is my exact context:
- I have a custom column for a button:
return new ColumnCustomer, String(new ButtonCell()) {
@Override
public final String
I'm having a problem with the conversion of a JSON to a JNI overlay type.
The java code has to following method:
long nr = 10l;
public Long getNr() {
return nr;
}
The JNI overlay type is:
public final native Long getNr() /*-{
return this.nr;
}-*/;
I'm avoiding operating with the
drop to JSNI the compiler isn't touching your
code, and therefore it doesn't make any sense to have a JSNI method return
a
long.
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 5:17 AM, Eugen Paraschiv hanrisel...@gmail.com
wrote:
I'm having a problem with the conversion of a JSON to a JNI overlay type.
The java
Long.parseLong(getNrRaw());
}
private final native String getNrRaw() {
return this.nr;
}
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 2:07 PM, Eugen Paraschiv hanrisel...@gmail.com
wrote:
So essentially once you have a overlay type corresponding to a model on
the
server, and the server model has a method returning
Having the same issue. Yes, the war directory is in src/main/webapp instead
of in targets. Any know info on this being handled?
Thanks.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to
I'm having the same issue with the M2 version of GWT 2.1.0. Is this a
known issue?
On Jun 16, 12:34 am, Otto von...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I was playing around with GWT and learning it and found the bikeshed
source code. I got it to compile but when I try to run it I get
errors.
As you can
I have followed almost the same path since watching the Google IO
presentation, I'll try to add my two cents about the my experiences
with MVP and the bus.
First, I see them as independent concepts - you can go about
implementing MVP without touching the concept of the Bus, or the other
way
- Junit 4 support would be one great addition, as writing JUnit 3
tests is really a pain
- the fake DOM structures that one of the GWT talks at Google IO talks
about would be great as well (for the purposes of testing)
- removing all the deprecated classes from the trunk (DevMode still
warns about
Can I test my client side GWT code without GWTTestCase? I've heard
somewhere (I think it was one of the Google IO 2009 conferences) that
they were successfully testing their code with a fake DOM, in the JVM
and not in Javascript with the DOM. That would be brilliant. Does
anybody have any idea
Quick question...when you say provider, what do you mean exactly? Is
there a specific provider method pattern?
On Jun 29, 7:41 pm, Ricardo Rocha rocha.po...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi again.
On Jun 24, 3:16 pm, Thomas Broyer t.bro...@gmail.com wrote:
On 24 juin, 12:01, rocha.po...@gmail.com
I have a question related to widget creation: is it indicated (to use
deferred binding and have my code base as small as possible) to create
my widgets via GWT.create() or can I still have the benefits while
still creating the widgets via the constructor?
I ask this because of the limitations of
I'm using GWT 1.5.2. I'll try to be brief, as the question is already
in the forums, albeit with no definitive answer.
I want to send a collection of objects over the wire. The collection
is a list (ArrayList to be exact), the objects ARE SERIALIZABLE
(evidently). All is good, but the collection
35 matches
Mail list logo
