Re: [ANN] (Unofficial) GWT 2.8.2-v20191108 release

-dream for 3 year now, porting dead-end and old GWT APIs to jacl with no end in sight..sigh On Thursday, January 9, 2020 at 9:07:50 PM UTC-8, Peter Donald wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jan 8, 2020 at 12:38 PM Hristo Stoyanov > wrote: > >> Hi Peter, >> I tried to use your GWT dis

Re: [ANN] (Unofficial) GWT 2.8.2-v20191108 release

Hi Peter, I tried to use your GWT distro, and although I see that I get the right artifacts on my classpath: default - Configuration for default artifacts. +--- com.peruncs.gwt:gwt-utils:0.0.6 +--- com.peruncs.gwt:gwt-stripe:0.0.6 |\--- com.peruncs.gwt:gwt-utils:0.0.6 +---

Re: [ANN] (Unofficial) GWT 2.8.2-v20191108 release

Peter and all, Any chance this is released as GWT 2.8.3 ? The Gradle (and Maven?) plug-ins cannot use it otherwise: https://github.com/esoco/gwt-gradle-plugin/issues/22 On Sunday, November 10, 2019 at 7:20:20 PM UTC-8, Peter Donald wrote: > > GWT is a development toolkit for building and

Re: GWT goodies!

No problem, Tabulator and UiKit are very powerful On Thursday, October 17, 2019 at 3:25:46 PM UTC-7, Rob Newton wrote: > > Hristo, Thanks for that. I had not heard of Tabulator -- it could be > useful. Cheers! > > On Friday, October 18, 2019 at 4:56:27 AM UTC+11, Hristo

GWT goodies!

Hello all, I have been maintaining a few GWT projects, mostly JsInterop wrappers around popular and useful JS libs that I think others can find useful. All is Apache 2.0 licensed, at various state of maturity. Contributions welcome! https://github.com/peruncs/gwt GWT goodies This repository

Re: [ANN] (Unofficial) Elemental2 2.26 release

mail. Sorry about that! > > 2.26 will be compatible with GWT 2.9 when/if that gets out. > > On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 12:08 PM Hristo Stoyanov > wrote: > >> Peter, >> Getting this error with Elemental 2.26 and GWT 2.8.2: >> >> elemental2_version=2.26 >>

Re: [ANN] (Unofficial) Elemental2 2.26 release

Peter, Getting this error with Elemental 2.26 and GWT 2.8.2: elemental2_version=2.26 jsinterop_base_version=1.0.0-b2-e6d791f jsinterop_version=1.0.2-p1 ... Compiling module com.recres.web.MainDev Tracing compile failure path for type 'elemental2.core.JsArray' [ERROR] Errors in

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: Java11 support

hem. > > On Wednesday, February 6, 2019 at 3:17:22 PM UTC-6, Hristo Stoyanov wrote: >> >> >> I am also curious. GWT 2.8.2 being on Java 8 is major holdup for my >> projects. Whatever happened to the GWT steering committee ??? Can we just >> get GWT 2.9 with the on

[gwt-contrib] Re: Java11 support

I am also curious. GWT 2.8.2 being on Java 8 is major holdup for my projects. Whatever happened to the GWT steering committee ??? Can we just get GWT 2.9 with the only feature being Java 11 support? On Monday, January 7, 2019 at 10:19:28 AM UTC-8, Alexander Leshkin wrote: > > Is there any one

Re: [ANNOUNCE] (Unofficial) Elemental2 1.0.0-b14-2f97dbe packages published to Maven Central

Thank you! I wish the core elemental team was doing those releases ... On Sunday, February 3, 2019 at 5:57:12 PM UTC-8, Peter Donald wrote: > > Version 1.0.0-b15-7a28038 has been published to Maven Central (but it may > take an hour or so to be replicated out). A problem was identified - namely

Re: A German Short Article for J2CL Open Source Release

... import elemental2.core.Global; import elemental2.core.JsDate; import elemental2.dom.DomGlobal; import elemental2.webstorage.Storage; import elemental2.webstorage.WebStorageWindow; ... private Storage storage; ... storage =

Re: New Gradle plugin for GWT available

Good to hear, I will give it a try! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send

New Gradle plugin for GWT available

Are you using this plugin yourself and do you plan on developing with GWT in the long run? The other plugins were abondended becuase their authors moved on. Congrats! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT Users" group. To unsubscribe from this

[gwt-contrib] Union types hack

I wonder if the hack described below can be applied to Elemental2 union types: https://blog.jooq.org/2016/02/16/an-ingenious-workaround-to-emulate-sum-types-in-java/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT Contributors" group. To unsubscribe from this

GWT HEAD-SNAPSHOT compile error

Trying to compile my GWT project with the latest HEAD-SNAPSHOT version and getting this error: Unable to load annotation processing manager org.eclipse.jdt.internal.compiler.apt.dispatch.BatchAnnotationProcessorManager from classpath. What Maven/Gradle dependecie do I need? -- You received

Re: [gwt-contrib] Update on J2CL

Guys, Thanks for the update to J2CL! Here is what I understood, the questions I have - correct me, if I am wrong: 1. Google is seeing good results from J2CL in a number of products, so your internal funding won't be cut, J2CL won't be abandoned! That is good news! 2. J2CL itself is build with

[gwt-contrib] Java 9+ modules for GWT

Some discussions here on how to move to annotation-based, Java9 modular design for J2CL/GWT modules: https://gist.github.com/lofidewanto/2262441fe61f887158347f68418f04e3 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT Contributors" group. To unsubscribe from

GWT 2.8.3 plans?

Any plans for a new release? Pretty soon it will be 6 months since 2.8.2, and this days even Java is released every 6 months... -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: Elemental2:1.0.0-beta-2 released

Hm ... Julien states it only works with the latest get head snapshot, maybe not 2.8.2? Also, seems like beta-3 with Colin's findings was never pushed out to maven? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT Contributors" group. To unsubscribe from this

Re: Gradle 4.1 gwt-gradle-plugin multi module project not finding other modules dependencies

Well ... That plugin was abandoned long time ago. I use putnami's gwt Gradle plugin On Monday, October 16, 2017 at 12:30:31 PM UTC-7, Bryan Hughes wrote: > > Was my bad. > > Package path's weren't lined up to be under .client. > > On Saturday, October 14, 2017 at 7:33:25 PM UTC-4, Bryan Hughes

GWT modules as Java 9 modules - is this possible?

https://stackoverflow.com/questions/46514340/module-annotations-in-java-9-and-additional-module-metadata -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: Business proposition of GWT 3.0 - what is it good for vs. other solutions out there?

On Tuesday, May 23, 2017 at 12:57:35 PM UTC-7, Learner Evermore wrote: > > J2Cl will be a Google project (not a GWT project; actually not dissimilar >> to how GWT currently leverages Eclipse JDT/ECJ, Jetty, etc.) but it'll be >> open source and accept external contributions too. >> > I didn't

Re: Compiler error with the latest gwt head ?

log(String message) /*-{ console.log(message); }-*/; } On Tuesday, April 25, 2017 at 5:49:10 PM UTC-7, Hristo Stoyanov wrote: > > > > :recres-client:compileJava > :recres-client:compileJava - is not incremental (e.g. outputs have > changed, no previous execut

Re: Compiler error with the latest gwt head ?

Also present in the just release GWT 2.8.1 On Tuesday, April 25, 2017 at 5:49:10 PM UTC-7, Hristo Stoyanov wrote: > > > > :recres-client:compileJava > :recres-client:compileJava - is not incremental (e.g. outputs have > changed, no previous execution, etc.). > :recres-cl

Compiler error with the latest gwt head ?

:recres-client:compileJava :recres-client:compileJava - is not incremental (e.g. outputs have changed, no previous execution, etc.). :recres-client:processResources NO-SOURCE :recres-client:classes :recres-client:gwtCompile Apr 25, 2017 5:44:22 PM java.util.prefs.WindowsPreferences WARNING:

[gwt-contrib] Re: GWT 2.8.1 release testers required!

Colin, How does one reference this version in Maven/Gradle projects: HEAD-SNAPSHOT or 2.8.1-SNPASHOT? The later seems pretty old (November 216)? Thanks. On Thursday, April 13, 2017 at 4:51:08 PM UTC-7, Colin Alworth wrote: > > We're about ready to release GWT 2.8.1, a bugfix release a variety

Re: GWT 2.8.0 released

Cool! So what's next? I see a bunch of unmerged code request sitting in gerrit. Is GWT 2.9 coming with all things in it that did not make it into 2.8? if so, when? On Friday, October 21, 2016 at 12:21:41 PM UTC-7, Daniel Kurka wrote: > > Hi all, > > I am very happy to announce GWT 2.8.0 on

Re: GWT and Oracle

Oracle/Sun has history of failures on the client side ... Oracle used to push ADF Faces, a JSF-bases library that went nowhere. Until soon, they were still thinking about MVC frameworks (remember JSF and Struts back in the day?), thank god someone reminded them it is 2016 and they dropped MVC

Re: [GWT 2.8 SHNAPSHOT] missing stack trace for 'Should only call onDetach when the widget is attached to the browser's document'

Thomas, Yes, that is what I ended up doing at the end After some more digging though, I realised there maybe a reason why the stack trace comes like that: https://github.com/Putnami/putnami-gradle-plugin/issues/49 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google

Re: [GWT 2.8 SHNAPSHOT] missing stack trace for 'Should only call onDetach when the widget is attached to the browser's document'

Thanks Jens, I have my -style set to DETAILED for the SDM/Compiler, which should be more than enough. When I do F1 in Chrome Dev Tools, I see these options checked: Enable JavaScript source maps Enable CSS source maps On Tuesday, September 27, 2016 at 11:19:13 AM UTC-7, Jens wrote: > >

Re: [GWT 2.8 SHNAPSHOT] missing stack trace for 'Should only call onDetach when the widget is attached to the browser's document'

t 5:24:25 PM UTC-4, Hristo Stoyanov wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> I wonder if anyone can help me figure out what is causing this - I am >> getting* java.lang.IllegalStateException: Should only call onDetach when >> the widget is attached to the browser's document* *. *See belo

[GWT 2.8 SHNAPSHOT] missing stack trace for 'Should only call onDetach when the widget is attached to the browser's document'

Hi all, I wonder if anyone can help me figure out what is causing this - I am getting* java.lang.IllegalStateException: Should only call onDetach when the widget is attached to the browser's document* *. *See below. I suspect this is a GWT exception of some kind, but the stack trace is

[gwt-contrib] Re: Documentation site on github

How about using www.gitbook.com? Several OSS projets are doing it, their docs look great, for example: www.keycloak.org/documentation.html On Thursday, January 8, 2015 at 2:04:28 PM UTC-8, Julien Dramaix wrote: > > Dear GWT Community, > > In order to increase the number of contributions on the

Re: Documentation site on github

How about using www.gitbook.com? Several OSS projets are doing it, their docs look great, for example: www.keycloak.org/documentation.html On Thursday, January 8, 2015 at 2:04:28 PM UTC-8, Julien Dramaix wrote: > > Dear GWT Community, > > In order to increase the number of contributions on the

Re: GWT RPC in GWT 3.0+

Gwt-rpc had siMilar fate as RMI in java - it was cute idea at first, but we wish it was not in modern java... -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to

Re: Putnami Gradle plugin 0.4.0 for GWT

Awesome plugin! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to

Re: GWT-2.8-SNAPSHOT jar questions

. On Wednesday, June 15, 2016 at 8:46:08 AM UTC-7, Hristo Stoyanov wrote: > > Thank you Jens and Thomas! > I am trying to cut down get compile time and produce thin wars ... -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT Users" group. To unsubscr

Re: gwt-interop-utils release on Maven Central

Thank you! On Saturday, June 18, 2016 at 5:28:57 PM UTC-7, Paul Stockley wrote: > > I have pushed an initial version of gwt-interop-utils to Maven Central. > Thanks for everyone's feedback. I have incorporated what I think makes > sense. The documentation has been updated to reflect the

Re: GWT-2.8-SNAPSHOT jar questions

Thank you Jens and Thomas! I am trying to cut down get compile time and produce thin wars ... -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to

GWT-2.8-SNAPSHOT jar questions

Hi all, I have a couple of questions regarding GWT 2.8 SNAPSHOT: *1. Why am I picking up tons of jetty libraries for doing a simple gwt compilation? I could understand the need for the Jetty jars, if I was running the code server, or including the servlet library, but just for

Re: Closure compiler removal ?

Thanks Jen, Well, if the option is dropped, we'd better fix gradle/maven plugins. If the closure compiler is not good in 2.8, it probably was not any better in 2.7 either... and was always marked "experimental". I already fixed my scripts. -- You received this message because you are

Re: Issues with GWT 2.8 snapshot

Thank Thomas, I will take a deeper look. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group,

Re: Issues with GWT 2.8 snapshot

code review link Roberto mentioned says it's still under review and > hasn't been merged yet. > > -.. .- ...- .. -.....-... . -.-. -.- . .-. > > On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 8:50 AM, Hristo Stoyanov <hr.st...@gmail.com > > wrote: > >> Thanks Roberto, >> Ju

Closure compiler removal ?

According to this: https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/#/c/15110/ The -XenableClosudeCompiler option will be removed from GWT 2.8. This impacts Cradle And Maven plugins. I also have 2 question: 1. Is specifying -optimte 9 good enough to be the only one left? 2. The reason for the removal states

Re: Issues with GWT 2.8 snapshot

tps://gwt-review.googlesource.com/#/c/15080) and the fix for those > is up for review https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/#/c/15120/ > > On Thursday, June 9, 2016 at 8:55:36 AM UTC-7, Hristo Stoyanov wrote: >> >> Thomas, yes, it is a javadoc failure, and it is still there. I just >> re-tr

Re: JsInterop and Java collections?

Paul, Yes, it boils down to JSInterop automatically handling some well-known implementations of java.util.List (LinkedList,ArrayList) as JS arrays. The direction Java->JS is easy: the JsInterop will map anything implementing java.util.List into js array. JS developers only see arrays on the

Re: Issues with GWT 2.8 snapshot

to make sure it's not due to a >>> corrupted JAR during upload to Sonatype OSSRH? >>> >>> On Thursday, June 9, 2016 at 11:40:53 AM UTC+2, Henrik wrote: >>>> >>>> Seeing the same problems (maven build). Worked fine 10 hrs ago though, >>>>

Issues with GWT 2.8 snapshot

I started getting the following errors with Gradle builds and the latest GWT 2.8.-SNAPSHOT - any idea ? ===

Re: JsInterop and Java collections?

igh > level js libraries your application actually needs). > > On the negative side I am somewhat worry of the danger to be confusing for > plain GWT users (like me). GWT lready has 2 element types (one deprecated). > A third one unavoidably will increase the confusion. > > >

Re: JsInterop and Java collections?

helper/utils" discussed in this forum. On Monday, June 6, 2016 at 3:58:53 PM UTC-7, Thomas Broyer wrote: > > > > On Monday, June 6, 2016 at 9:15:43 PM UTC+2, Hristo Stoyanov wrote: >> >> Kirrill, >> I did not suggest to *convert*, but *map*. That means that if/

Re: JsInterop and Java collections?

Kirrill, I did not suggest to *convert*, but *map*. That means that if/when a JSInter-oped class is exported into the JS Engine (let's say V8) , the JS developer will see plain old js arrays, so s/he can work with them as they have been for ages. When Java/JsInterop developers work with the

Re: JsInterop and Java collections?

Thanks Jen, Let me try to explain the issue better: In your example, JsArray must have a bunch of native methods mapped to the native JavaScript Array API. None of these methods bring much value to the

Re: JsInterop and Java collections?

Thanks for the confirmation, Jen! When you think about it, other Java APIs (jaxb, jpa, Jackson) do go the extra mile to accommodate Java collections, and the example above looks like can be exported to js object (could use a helper annotation @JsX or two). As a result, now I see why Paul is

JsInterop and Java collections?

Hi all, I might have missed this in the JsInterop specs, but how is JsInterop handling Java collections, e.g is this going to work at all and what will the browser's JS engine see? @JsType(isNative = true, namespace = JsPackage.GLOBAL) > public class Somethin{ > @JsProperty > public

Re: gwt-inerop-utils preview

Paul, I am also hesitating a bit too ... I see some people that I respect do go for the whole enchilada with no regrets. Here is a JS AP I that requires 4-argument

Re: gwt-inerop-utils preview

e getters/setters and is > defined functions for objects. All you would need to do is pass $wnd into > these. Let me have a play around and see what I can come up with. > > On Thursday, June 2, 2016 at 4:50:08 PM UTC-4, Hristo Stoyanov wrote: >> >> Thanks Paul, >> I wa

Re: gwt-inerop-utils preview

Jen, If adding a couple of more interfaces is code smell, take a look at this ... Also, take a look at JS APIs like this - are we all supposed to define the same

Re: gwt-inerop-utils preview

ovides similar functionality, the switch to it was painless,* but most importantly, the author, Fabien Dumay, is very responsive!* I could re-write you gradle scripts in a pull request, if that is ok? On Thursday, June 2, 2016 at 1:50:08 PM UTC-7, Hristo Stoyanov wrote: > > Thanks Paul, &

Re: gwt-inerop-utils preview

Thanks Paul, I was about to start releasing similar code . It does not make sense to do the same thing twice and obviously such utility code is necessary. So, I will use your project as it

Re: JsInterop and default settings in JS structures - how to handle?

> > On Thursday, June 2, 2016 at 1:15:57 AM UTC+2, Hristo Stoyanov wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> This is a pretty common in the JS world, but take a look at this JS >> library <https://github.com/bevacqua/dragula>, which as part of its API >> has

JsInterop and default settings in JS structures - how to handle?

Hi all, This is a pretty common in the JS world, but take a look at this JS library , which as part of its API has settings/options for configuration, where options are done with something with JS structure like: *{* * ...* * isContainer: function (el) {

Re: JsInterop receipts for simple JSNI code ?

Boolean.TRUE.equals(eval("!!window['"+varName+"']")); } } I guess, you can also use JSON.safeEval() ... but we dont know if will survive in J2CL. On Wednesday, May 25, 2016 at 12:21:26 PM UTC-7, Hristo Stoyanov wrote: > > Jens, > Thanks, so apparently JsInterop cannot be a

Re: JsInterop receipts for simple JSNI code ?

Jens, Thanks, so apparently JsInterop cannot be a complete replacement of JSNI? I was hoping to be able to wrap in @JsType(native = true) something like Object.keys(window) On Tuesday, May 24, 2016

JsInterop receipts for simple JSNI code ?

Does any one know (/has easy receipts for) how to replace the following JSNI code with JsInterop code : *public static native String getJSVariableAsString(String jsVarName) /*-{* *return $wnd[jsVarName].toString();* *}-*/;* *private static native boolean isJSVariableDefined(String

Re: JsInterop funcional interfaces question

Thanks Jen .. let me know if you plan to release such library outside GWT core. I am about to open source 2 GWT modules and I hate to duplicate code in both. Or I can start this effort? On Tuesday, May 17, 2016 at 11:15:02 AM UTC-7, Jens wrote: > > > Thank Jen, >> I saw the discussion. ... Well

Re: JsInterop funcional interfaces question

Thank Jen, I saw the discussion. ... Well perhaps then provide some common functional interfaces with @JsFunction in core GWT, so that library authors stop re-inventing the hot water and the wheel every time they need callbacks. On Tuesday, May 17, 2016 at 10:09:43 AM UTC-7, Jens wrote: > > We

JsInterop funcional interfaces question

Hi all, Why is it necessary to mark up functional interfaces in GWT2.8 with @JsFunction. Is the standard @FunctionalInterface not enough? My concern is that pretty soon every new GWT project (which most likely will need some forms of callbacks) would be inflicting on users code like the one

[GTW 2.8] How to use JSON-like data with JSInterop

Hi all, How do I construct input for the following jQuery call: $('.ui.form') .form({ fields: { name : 'empty', gender : 'empty', username : 'empty', password : ['minLength[6]', 'empty'], skills : ['minCount[2]', 'empty'], terms : 'checked' } }) ; My current plan is to use

When is GWT 2.8 provide java.util.stream.IntStream emulation?

... i am working with the 4/20 snapshot and do not see it. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post

Re: [2.8-SNAPSHOT] Obscure stack traces

Thanks Jens, I do see the Java sources in Chrome and can debug. Fort for the settings, I suppose you mean : ... ... Is that correct? And can you please point me to a documentation link for it... Thanks! On Friday, April 22, 2016 at 3:52:58 AM UTC-7, Jens

[2.8-SNAPSHOT] Obscure stack traces

Hi all, I often get stack traces like the one below at run-time, which are not helpful at all. Am I missing some compiler switch in GWT 2.8 or what? I do have source maps enabled in Chrome. com.google.gwt.core.client.JavaScriptException: (TypeError) : this.$$outer_0_27_g$.lambda$0_11_g$ is

Re: Struggling with gwt 2.8/JsInterop and jQuery, help please!

Jens, Thanks .. this seems to work: @JsType(isNative = true, name = "Checkbox", namespace = "checkbox") public class SUICheckbox extends JQueryContext { ... @JsType(isNative = true, name = "Object", namespace = GLOBAL) public static class SettingsClass {

Re: Struggling with gwt 2.8/JsInterop and jQuery, help please!

Jens, So how do I create an instance of it? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group,

Struggling with gwt 2.8/JsInterop and jQuery, help please!

Hi all, I need to interface with JQuery API that looks like this: http://semantic-ui.com/modules/checkbox.html#/examples $('.callback.example .checkbox') .checkbox() .first() .checkbox({ onChecked: function() {...}, onUnchecked: function() {...},

Re: What is j2cl?

... they did it on purpose: http://www.jsweet.org/comparing-the-gwt-transpiler-and-jsweet/ ... a consequence of the simpler approach JSweet takes, is that they actually shipped and will be able to evolve jsweet much more quickly in future, IMO On Tuesday, February 23, 2016 at 3:08:48 AM

Re: Large no of gwt modules

Check out this talk by Max Barkley, towards the end - although he talks about Errai (which I highly recommend), the ideas with JsInterop project splitting might be applicable outside Errai as well : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KeCTj1oIKR0

Publishing docs for GWT

Can you please stop publishing documents on drive.google.com? Lots of companies in the US filter out file sharing sites as part of their internet use policies. Also, why is the latest jsinterop spec not included in the GWT 2.8 beta release? -- You received this message because you are

Firefox 15 and dev mode plug-in

... well, here we go again. FF15 has been pushed out. Does anyone tried the dev plugin that Alan Leung maintains for FF15? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To view this discussion on the web visit