On 11/18/10 10:32 PM, John LaBanca wrote:
The scrollbars are a separate widget called ShowMorePagerPanel.
CellList doesn't have scrollbars by default.
On 11/19/10 7:31 PM, John LaBanca wrote:
CellTable/CellList and the pager (RangeChangeHandler) were designed to
support infinite scrolling. We created the version in Showcase as a
proof of concept. It helps to think about the scrolling mechanism
(Pager) and the CellTable separately. The
On 11/10/10 7:35 PM, John LaBanca wrote:
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 6:33 AM, István Szoboszlai mrsz...@gmail.com
mailto:mrsz...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I would need 2 functions in the new GWT 2.1 CellTable.
1. Multiple tr-f for table header.
We plan to start work on a more feature
One thing I would find interesting (and future safe) would be to port
the following piece of code to GWT;
http://weblog.bocoup.com/javascript-eventsource-now-available-in-firefox
And then use deferred binding to use real EventSource on browsers that
support it.
--
You received this
This is not the final version yet (among other issues, the location is
up for debate) but I would like to give people a chance to comment on it
at this stage.
Is there a reason not to put it in com.google.gwt.user.canvas ?
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
We're using more of a document-style model than a JPA-style
relationmodel.
I'm wondering if it is possible to somehow put have nested proxies
that does not have an id field. In other words; proxies that
are not real entities of their own.
--
You received this message because you are
Have you guys looked at http://github.com/chirino/resty-gwt ?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google
Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
I have yet to find any documentation on the on-wire protocol
that RequestFactory uses. Are there any, or does it have to
be reverse-engineered?
Also, does GWT _require_ the service methods actually be
available in the entity class?
RequestFactory being based on JSON makes it a better fit for
Hi,
AFAICT, RequestFactory (as it will be in 2.1, as it should be in M4)
seems to be what you're looking for:
- fast: pure JSON (will use native JSON if available, falling back
to json2.js otherwise)
- no stack dependency: your entity proxies are JavaScriptObjects
directly parsed
Ping!
On 2010/09/07 16:49:52, rjrjr wrote:
Please!
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 8:01 AM, Joel Webber mailto:j...@google.com
wrote:
@rjrjr: I notice you own the bug -- do you have time to look at
this, or
would you like me to take it off your hands?
Le 6 septembre 2010 04:48,
Has anyone here made a popup menu using MenuBar?
My current approach is to simply put a vertical MenuBar
in a PopupPanel. But I do not want to be forced to
explicitly close the popup panel in my menu commands.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google
Reviewers: ,
Description:
Let MenuItem implement HasEnabled and update MenuBar to use this
information when selecting items.
The themes are also updated with a gwt-MenuItem-disabled rule.
This is an attempt to fix
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=1649
Please
Just a proof-of-concept: http://github.com/jrydberg/jrydberg-bindings
A generator with a few support classes that provides a way to get a
HasValueT for a bean property. It supports nested bindings, and is
type safe.
See the README-file in the project for more information.
--
On 9/1/10 10:01 PM, Ray Ryan wrote:
Sorry, still not public. However, we're landing a patch that will
eliminate a lot of the need for it:
OK. But will it become public at some point in time?
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
I haven't checked m3 yet, but will the parser API be public in 2.1? It's the
one thing that would make it perfect.
Sent from my iPhone
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
On 8/25/10 6:16 PM, Ray Ryan wrote:
The use case is dealing with boolean values that may be null, and
really a check box is just the wrong UI there. Withdrawn.
I know of at least one data binding framework, gwt-pectin, that signals
no value using null. As a work-around gwt-pectin has it's own
Done!
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 4:00 PM, jlaba...@google.com wrote:
@johan -
Can you sign a Contributor License Agreement so we can include your
code:
http://code.google.com/legal/individual-cla-v1.0.html
If you scroll to the bottom, you can sign it electronically.
- John
Reviewers: ,
Description:
Introduce an interface for widgets that has a setEnabled method.
Please review this at http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/757801/show
Affected files:
user/src/com/google/gwt/user/client/ui/FocusWidget.java
user/src/com/google/gwt/user/client/ui/HasEnabled.java
On 8/6/10 2:44 PM, Chris Ramsdale wrote:
Hey GWT(ers),
I've heard from many of you that GWT apps simply don't look that good
out of the box, and styling the default app would go a long way. We
couldn't agree more. As some of you know, GWT 2.1 (with the help of
Spring Roo 1.1) will generate a
On 6/30/10 11:57 AM, Roy wrote:If the answer is that View A *will* catch
its own event, any
recommendations on how to identify the event in such a way that View A
knows it was the originator?
Maybe you can use this;
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/649801/diff/1/88
File user/src/com/google/gwt/user/client/ui/ValueBoxBase.java (right):
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/649801/diff/1/88#newcode46
user/src/com/google/gwt/user/client/ui/ValueBoxBase.java:46:
SourcesChangeEvents, HasChangeHandlers,
There's still no way to add custom events? I'm looking at doing html5
drag-and-drop, but it is impossible when you can not hook up your event
handlers.
On 8/17/09 11:54 PM, Eric Kidd wrote:
GWT is a really clever piece of compiler technology!
I'm currently experimenting with HTML 5'svideo/
While planning a new Application I'm trying to figure out how to best
design it to get the most out of the whole ClientBundle thing.
But I'm trying to figure out how to use the bundles in ways that they
(1) were intended to be and (2) that fit my needs;
* Is the goal to have a single Resource
Why isn't it public? Is that part of the API still considered unstable?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google
Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
On 1/31/10 11:11 AM, bamd...@gmail.com wrote:
hi
i'm gwt newbie , and want to make a multiplayer TicTacToe with GWT
Comet for proof of concept.
i found GWT-Comet , gwt-comet-streamhub , rocket-gwt and... and i dont
know which one should i use.
does GWT supports Comet or i should use one of
Have you guys checked the http://github.com/chirino/resty-gwt project?
It has a generator
that does pretty much all the awful things Roger talks about.
On 1/28/10 9:14 AM, Abdullah Shaikh wrote:
Hi Roger,
Then the only option left is xml, of course if we are not going
GWT-RPC way.
So what
Any comments on when gwt query will be integrated with GWT?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google
Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
I've seen some software packages and frameworks for GWT
that is released under LGPL. Timefire's Chronoscope is
one of those.
This got me thing about how LGPL and other restrictive
licenses work in relation to GWT.
Normally LGPL allows you to link a library or framework
with your commercial
On Dec 17, 2009, at 3:03 PM, Arthur Kalmenson wrote:
Working on a draft one.
What do folks here think is important?
- data binding and validation frameworks, which would remove a _lot_
of boiler plate code and greatly increase productivity.
Absolutely!
- incubator clean up and perhaps
On Dec 17, 2009, at 3:03 PM, Arthur Kalmenson wrote:
Working on a draft one.
What do folks here think is important?
- data binding and validation frameworks, which would remove a _lot_
of boiler plate code and greatly increase productivity.
- incubator clean up and perhaps splitting it
I did a very-very simplified layout system based on
top,bottom,left,right,width and height CSS attributes:
http://69.20.122.77:8880/gwt-layout/
So far SimpleLayout, HBoxLayout VBoxLayout are implemented.
Source files: http://69.20.122.77:8880/gwt-layout/org.gwt20.mosaic.demo.tbz2
The
On Jun 23, 2009, at 1:18 AM, Andrew Pietsch wrote:
Hi there,
Like many others I'm looking forward to see what you guys come up with
in the databinding area. But I miss some of the PresentationModel/
ValueModel style frameworks I've come to like in Swing and thought I'd
put in my 2c
Zakaluka skrev:
The UI Binder is currently listed under the Post-1.6 timeframe.
Seeing as how GWT 1.5.3 is the latest version out there and 1.6 will
come out in the next 3 months, it'll probably be quite a while before
we see UI Binder out in a stable form.
It would had been better if the
Joshua Partogi skrev:
Dear all,
Has anyone worked GWT with non-Java backend (like PHP or Rails) and
send it with AJAX Http request? Does it work good? I am wondering
whether this is a good approach. I would appreciate any experience
shared here.
I've developed a GWT RPC gateway to Python
From the first look it looks good.
Lacking as usual (as you point out) is documentation, tutorials
and examples.
Great to see someone who implements a template system. I'll see
if I get around to try it out. Or I'll wait until there are
some documentation in place.
~jr
Dobes skrev:
Yeah ... I'll add documentation based on how much time and motivation
I get, which partly depends on the interest I get in the application.
I did add some documentation for the template system recently and I'll
try and find a way to post the javadocs somewhere too.
What I'm
36 matches
Mail list logo
