Hi, Xandre,
Could you pls share me your sample code ? I am figuring out how to use it
in my project.
TIA
On Friday, April 25, 2014 at 4:15:23 AM UTC+8, JoyaleXandre wrote:
If it may help, I noticed that the problem occur only when Lightbox is
launch from a DialogBox with Glass enabled.
I am using the latest GWT version and it seems no IE10 support yet.
Any plan update on it ?
thanks a lot
OrNot
On Thursday, December 13, 2012 10:06:30 AM UTC+8, Goktug Gokdogan wrote:
I'm not sure about timing but we will definitely add support for IE10.
I expect most of the work
I am using the latest GWT version and it seems no IE10 support yet.
Any plan update on it ?
thanks a lot
OrNot
On Thursday, December 13, 2012 10:06:30 AM UTC+8, Goktug Gokdogan wrote:
I'm not sure about timing but we will definitely add support for IE10.
I expect most of the work
@Palo,G:
Uemit is correct. There are many cases that need client computing and
specific algorithms, for instance, image processing, especially for
those which
need prompt interactivity. You can not always push the data to the
sever to
process and then get the result back to show. In low bandwidth
OMG,it's a really sad news. Anyway, obfuscation can at least make the
codes hard to readable and its reader must pay more efforts to
recover the original codes somehow, doesn't it?
Second question: Even the code can not be recovered, it still can be
used arbitrarily by anybody as long as it is
So,how can I protect my js code suppose for some reason I must put
that algorithm to client side?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from
Hi, there,
If I have some algorithms which are implemented with GWT and
obfuscated to JS, is it safe enough to protect it from being hacked?
Suppose no RPC is involved
here?
Regards
OrNot
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit
Hello,
The question seems asked before but never have a clear answer.
Anybody has
ideas?
If support, how to decode it ?
Thanks in advance.
OrNot
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email
can kindly confirm it ?
Thanks a lot.
OrNot
On Aug 7, 7:52 am, OrNOt ornot2...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, Christian,
Yes,I have tried to modify the code to pass array. But it seems
impossible. The reason is not from speed tracer part but from GWT
internal implementation If I understand well
and
firefox and getting the same error.
I don't know how to go further now. ;-( . Convert the array to
string might be a
solution but the performance will be bad for big array.
OrNot
On Aug 6, 2:01 am, cidylle0 cidyl...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi OrNot,
Yes please if you could help out and let me
Hi, Cidylle,
I wrote one example based on speed tracer 's web worker and
after some sort of struggling
make it run.
If you like , I can send the source code to you. It seems no
place to attach file here?
Regards.
OrNot
BTW: I also need your help if possible. I want to pass
Hello, there,
I want to use speed tracer's web worker in my project, but I
can't find an example about it. Anybody can help me to write a very
simple Hello world ?
Thanks in advance.
OrNot
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit
(TreeLogger.SPAM, this= + jsthis);
Can I bypass the log in debug mode ? Or any idea I can speed my
debugging?
Thanks in advance.
OrNot
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web
Hi, there,
I have a question on the bufferedImage.
I know this class is from AWT. My question is if I can use it
in the client code? If not, what the
com.google.gwt.user.rebind.uiserves?This not a client code?
I am confused somehow.
Thanks for your helps.
OrNot
14 matches
Mail list logo
