I'll have to play around with it more. Does it just do paging on the data?
A lot of the data we'll be displaying won't be in rows and columns. This
was mostly just a test to see how well it would render views under extreme
conditions. The cell list could be super useful. Thanks!
--
You receive
If you need to dynamically create a lot of rows based on data; have a look
at CellTable, instead of building a Grid or FlexTable and putting widgets
in there. It's a total shift in how to approach the problem, but it's
designed for rendering performance in mind (to be usable on mobile devices,
I created this little app that will generate a bunch of rows for you.
Inside of each row is 5 Labels that pull the date.
http://acumeta.coryschulz.com/gwttest/
So type in something like "5000" and it should render pretty fast and give
you the amount of time it took. For each row it's just pulli
Yeah, it entirely was running in Eclipse and when I compile the project and
publish it, it does run much faster. I always generate the views first and
then push the changes out to the DOM in one or two steps because I know
that's the fastest way to do it. I just didn't realize how much slower it
Just keep in mind that development mode is really a lot slower than the
final compiled javascript code (development mode in Firefox seems to be the
fastest, Safari is ok, Chrome feels slow).
How do you generate your views?
I am not quite sure but I think something like:
FlowPanel wrapper = ne
Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2011 4:33 PM
To: google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com
Subject: GWT Performance Issues
I was wondering if anyone has had any issues with performance in GWT and how
you solved it. Right now there is a project I'm working on where I get some
json and generate some view
I was wondering if anyone has had any issues with performance in GWT and
how you solved it. Right now there is a project I'm working on where I get
some json and generate some views and it's maybe 100 items long and GWT
takes around 8 seconds to render it in Chrome. I'm concerned because I'm
go
