And you have taken a close look at their implementation to pass the
judgment that it is slow? What about gwt-ext? Does it also have a
binding mechanism that is slow since you mention it as well. Methinks
its just your attempt to appear intelligent.
On Jan 17, 3:51 pm, Arthur Kalmenson
Ooops, my mistake. GXT also offers a binding mechanism, I thought he
was talking about that.
--
Arthur Kalmenson
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 9:20 AM, Rob Smith scubacarri...@gmail.com wrote:
You're such a broken record :)
You see GWT and 'x' and copy paste your complaint post. The user is
That's one of the caveat of using GXT, it's rather slow compared to
vanilla GWT. You can search around the group for opinions regarding
GXT and GWT-ext.
--
Arthur Kalmenson
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 5:22 PM, Glamdring bozhidar.bozha...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I plan to use GWTx Introspector
You're such a broken record :)
You see GWT and 'x' and copy paste your complaint post. The user is
referring to GWTx. Please read his original post carefully.
http://code.google.com/p/gwtx/
On Jan 16, 8:29 am, Arthur Kalmenson arthur.k...@gmail.com wrote:
That's one of the caveat of using
Hello,
I plan to use GWTx Introspector and BeanInfo in order to make a simple
binding mechanism. I however, have doubts about its efficiency - has
anyone tried them in a real project? (They seem fantastic for a Hello
World, but I don't want to redesign my application when at some point
the CPU
