Hi Falcon,
thank you very much!!!
This works perfectly!
I just copied your code in my main html file, right at the end of the
head tag.
Could you tell me how you found out that the width was set to 368 px?
In FF I have FireBug, but it did not show this width. In IE I have
nothing similar.
If the height is working for you, don't worry about changing it.
Keep in mind that GWT will actually send different code to different
browsers. The reason that you aren't seeing that value in Firebug in
Firefox was that Firefox was receiving a width of 100% and not the
368, but GWT was sending an
Hi Falcon,
if one should not use HorizontalPanel, would you prefer the use of
FlowPanel over inserting the IE7 specific style?
How did it come you proposed to change the height? (Maybe I have a
problem, I don't know yet! :-))
Magnus
On Aug 30, 3:37 pm, Falcon msu.fal...@gmail.com wrote:
If
Hi Falcon,
somhow you made me want to use only panels that work in standards
mode. So I derived my TitleBar from FlowPanel. Now the red borders are
only visible at the top and left, not at the right and bottom. In
addition the text is not v-aligned anymore.
What's this with the border? I have no
Hi Falcon,
somhow you made me want to use only panels that work in standards
mode. So I derived my TitleBar from FlowPanel. Now the red borders are
only visible at the top and left, not at the right and bottom. In
addition the text is not v-aligned anymore.
If you can get away with using a FlowPanel or one of the panels they
list as working in standards-mode and still get the layout you want, I
would do that instead; that way Google should take care of the layout
issues in the different browsers and you won't have to worry about it
again.
When I was
Hi Chris,
I have found it!!! I now know what is happening, but I have not actual
a solution. But I also think this should be interesting for you GWT
developers!
First of all, I found that the computer that compiled the bad
version (with the bad layout), had GWT version 2.0.4, while the
computer
For convenience I uploaded a minimalistic live demo with source code:
http://www.bavaria64.de:8080/LayoutProblem
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com.
To
The problem in the example code that you posted is that the width is
getting set to 368px on the table in the inline style, which is
overriding the width: 100% that you want. Now, I'm not looking at this
with IE7, but with IE9 developer preview in IE7 standards mode, so
it's possible that there's
Also, see
http://code.google.com/webtoolkit/doc/latest/DevGuideUiPanels.html#Standards
Specifically, this paragraph:
HorizontalPanel is a bit trickier. In some cases, you can simply
replace it with a DockLayoutPanel, but that requires that you specify
its childrens' widths explicitly. The most
Hi Chris,
could the different hash codes really lead to wrong display of
HorizontalPanels?
If I analyze the DOM with FireBug, I see no differences.
I also cleared my browser cache, but the wrong panels still reappear.
What can I do next?
Please note that this discourages me from continuing
Hello,
could someone please ponit me into the right direction?
What can I do that my code leads to the same results on different
compilation platforms?
Thank you
Magnus
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this
Well, until http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=8605
the
compiler could use different line endings which would result in a different
hash for your .cache.html files.
Though, this would not change the appearance of your code. Most likely, you
have your caching
13 matches
Mail list logo
