On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 12:46 PM, Justin M. Keyes justi...@gmail.com wrote:
At the GWT.create conference two weeks ago, John Stalcup mentioned
that GIN had a possibly-unreleased change that would work better with
the incremental compiler. The GIN repository[1] does not appear to
have any recent
At the GWT.create conference two weeks ago, John Stalcup mentioned
that GIN had a possibly-unreleased change that would work better with
the incremental compiler. The GIN repository[1] does not appear to
have any recent changes related to this.
Can anyone confirm whether these GIN changes are
On Wednesday, October 15, 2014 4:14:49 PM UTC+2, Gal Dolber wrote:
I kept digging on this issue. I was wrong before, its not that the
presenters reference the injector, the problem is that on every recompile
gwt add the entry point and trace all the reachable classes on the project.
My
Why do you need the injector? I'm not trying to be a smartass, just curious.
cheers, Guus
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to
I kept digging on this issue. I was wrong before, its not that the
presenters reference the injector, the problem is that on every recompile
gwt add the entry point and trace all the reachable classes on the project.
My entry point has the reference to the injector and my injector has a
reference
I noticed that SDM incremental compiles are always running gwt generators.
I'm using gin and all my controllers have a reference to the gin injector.
After the SDM gets to the injector it goes on to regenerate all my
presenters and most dependencies.
My minimal refresh time right now is 13s, When
It seems Gin kills the productivity during development, but giving to us
cleaner code. Maybe both advantages are not possible right now.
On 14 October 2014 09:52, Gal Dolber g...@dolber.com wrote:
I noticed that SDM incremental compiles are always running gwt generators.
I'm using gin and all
As a developer probably not. There are commits in GWT to improve recompile
times when generators run that produce lots of output,
e.g. https://gwt.googlesource.com/gwt/+/11b1cdcf38cacbccfb64e55bcd3a949b61528436
In our app we don't have references to the Ginjector except for
onModuleLoad().
That looks promising!
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 4:11 PM, Jens jens.nehlme...@gmail.com wrote:
As a developer probably not. There are commits in GWT to improve recompile
times when generators run that produce lots of output, e.g.
Oh, its an old change
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 4:22 PM, Gal Dolber g...@dolber.com wrote:
That looks promising!
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 4:11 PM, Jens jens.nehlme...@gmail.com wrote:
As a developer probably not. There are commits in GWT to improve
recompile times when generators run that
10 matches
Mail list logo
