If you want to use Hibernate I guess the persistence provider is wrong.
Looks like its the one of EclipseLink.
-- J.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
I am using stable Chrome Version 21.0.1180.89 and do not have any problems
with DevMode plugin on Mac OS (10.8.2). I switched to stable Chrome because
lately the DevMode plugin stopped working for me in all the dev versions of
Chrome.
-- J.
Am Mittwoch, 26. September 2012 03:37:59 UTC+2
Thanks for the link, Joseph - it's an old version of eclemma, but it works:
It shows client side coverage when running in dev mode (not in production
mode).
Then again, I'm not sure what the patch does exactly. I installed the
unpatched v1.3.2 and v1.5.3
from
On Tuesday, September 25, 2012 5:00:28 PM UTC+2, Celinio Fernandes wrote:
How can i save them ?
If you always only need the previously selected criteria, you don't have to
store them in the token:
- Either save the values somewhere in your Java objects (wherever you
want). When re-creating
On Wednesday, September 26, 2012 1:55:53 PM UTC+2, Chris Lercher wrote:
you can use HTML5
Storagehttps://developers.google.com/web-toolkit/doc/latest/DevGuideHtml5Storage
(consider
browser support).
Forgot to mention: You could also save them in a cookie.
--
You received this message
Chris,
Indeed, it is old. It still works however, and GWT Coverage is more
important to me than moving to v2.1. When getting my whole team to use it,
this is easier than asking folks to explode/repackage the jars as the
official GWT fix requires. I've looked at the patch on the Google site,
Hi there,
I have an entity proxy object that is created on the client. After
persisting into server, I would expect the returned proxy (from server) has
the same stableId() (i.e., the two equals)
But this is not happening. I thought GWT documentation says the two should
equal to each other.
Hi,
I think you could use plural forms to do that (see GWT documentation on
i18n). I'm using a bit simpler way:
public interfce MyMessage extends Messages
{
MyMessages INST = GWT.create(MyMessages.class);
String[] TEXTS = {INST.text1(), INST.text2()};
String tetx1();
String text2();
}
Satoshi,
The link you provided doesn't work for me. It returns:
Forbidden
You don't have permission to access /portal/alma/sv.do on this server.
On Monday, September 24, 2012 3:03:30 AM UTC-4, Satoshi Eguchi wrote:
Hello!
I'm Satoshi Eguchi, a posdoc of National Astronomical Observatory of
On Wednesday, September 26, 2012 3:42:43 PM UTC+2, Yan wrote:
Hi there,
I have an entity proxy object that is created on the client. After
persisting into server, I would expect the returned proxy (from server) has
the same stableId() (i.e., the two equals)
But this is not happening. I
public class Foo{ ... public List? extends Base getList(){...} ...}
public class Base {...}
public class A extends Base{...}
public class B extends Base{...}
@ProxyFor( value=Foo.class, locator...) public interface FooProxy extends
EntityProxy{ public List? extends BaseProxy getList(); public
Hi there,
One question about GWT request factory is that both RequestContext and
Proxy objects are one-off kind. In other words, a requestContext is fired
once and discarded. Because of that, client proxy is not supposed to be
kept around, either.
In addition, the
On Wednesday, September 26, 2012 4:25:12 PM UTC+2, Jakob Mar wrote:
public class Foo{ ... public List? extends Base getList(){...} ...}
public class Base {...}
public class A extends Base{...}
public class B extends Base{...}
@ProxyFor( value=Foo.class, locator...) public interface
On Wednesday, September 26, 2012 4:30:20 PM UTC+2, Yan wrote:
Hi there,
One question about GWT request factory is that both RequestContext and
Proxy objects are one-off kind. In other words, a requestContext is fired
once and discarded. Because of that, client proxy is not supposed to
Hmm ok.. so whats the provider?
Found this org.hibernate.ejb.HibernatePersistence one.
I updated the provider and put my class (Worker.java) in the
persistence.xml but Iam still get an exception:
When i create the EntityManagerFactory,
ReflectiveServiceLayer.invoke(Method domainMethod,
Tank you Thomas, that worked. However when using InProcessRequestTransport
and SimpleRequestProcessor (which I use for testing) this doesn't work. I
only get BaseProxy instances.
On Wednesday, September 26, 2012 2:36:16 PM UTC, Thomas Broyer wrote:
On Wednesday, September 26, 2012 4:25:12 PM
Some more Info:
Thats the Worker.java class:
package de.mash.project.server;
import javax.persistence.Column;
import javax.persistence.Entity;
import javax.persistence.EntityManager;
import javax.persistence.EntityManagerFactory;
import javax.persistence.GeneratedValue;
import
Hey guys,
today I was starting my gwt app in Chrome and there appears a message that
the dev plugin couldn´t be loaded. I think this could be the fault of an
auto update... Does anyone else have this issue on Mac osx with Chrome
22.0.1229.79
and dev plugin 1.0.9738?
this drives me crazy oO!
Btw, do I have to disable App Engine ? Actually My
Project-Propertys-Google-App Engine- Use Google App Engine is set.
Do I have to configurate jdoconfig.xml?
When i use the following persistence.xml I dont get the exception anymore,
buts its still not working :(
Thats the output:
Sep 26,
YES!! And I thought maybe uninstalling/reinstalling the plugin might help,
but it doesn't reinstall. :(
On Wednesday, September 26, 2012 12:49:08 PM UTC-4, Jambi wrote:
Hey guys,
today I was starting my gwt app in Chrome and there appears a message that
the dev plugin couldn´t be loaded.
ah ok! have you figured out a convienient way to roll back the versioning?
maybe someone has an idea which old version to use. I was trying an older
beta but it still won´t work
Am Mittwoch, 26. September 2012 19:23:25 UTC+2 schrieb John:
YES!! And I thought maybe uninstalling/reinstalling
It works with stable Chrome 21.x.xxx. Just don't use the Chrome Beta build.
-- J.
Am Mittwoch, 26. September 2012 18:49:08 UTC+2 schrieb Jambi:
Hey guys,
today I was starting my gwt app in Chrome and there appears a message that
the dev plugin couldn´t be loaded. I think this could be the
Chrome won't load my GWT DevMode plugin in my chromes? Whats the deal?
*How to installed on my mac...*
1. Click on the gwt devmode plugin and it downloads and wants to install.
2. Goto downloads in finder and drag that file onto the chrome://extensions
page and it will install.
--
You
No, just jumped over to Firefox. What a pain!
On Wednesday, September 26, 2012 1:35:29 PM UTC-4, Jambi wrote:
ah ok! have you figured out a convienient way to roll back the versioning?
maybe someone has an idea which old version to use. I was trying an older
beta but it still won´t work
Thanks! It works!
here some links:
http://mac.oldapps.com/google_chrome.php?old_chrome=1242
http://osxdaily.com/2012/04/06/disable-google-chrome-automatic-software-update/
Am Mittwoch, 26. September 2012 19:41:59 UTC+2 schrieb Jens:
It works with stable Chrome 21.x.xxx. Just don't use the
You should also consider using Firefox during development. The DevMode
plugin for Firefox is *a lot faster* than the Chrome plugin.
-- J.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
Yes, usually i do. But right now i´m developing with MGWT (so webkit only).
Am Mittwoch, 26. September 2012 20:01:37 UTC+2 schrieb Jens:
You should also consider using Firefox during development. The DevMode
plugin for Firefox is *a lot faster* than the Chrome plugin.
-- J.
--
You
Hmm, wish I could say that worked on my 2011 MacBook Pro 10.7.4 (
22.0.1229.79). Followed everyone else's instructions and installed with the
drag and drop method, and I can see the extension in the ToolsExtension's
page, but still no love.
It is worth noting the when no GWT plugin is
This morning I upgraded Chrome on openSUSE 12.2 from v19 to v22 and DevMode
stopped working.
I fixed this by going to menu - Settings - Extensions and checking
Allow in incognito. I dunno what the means or why it works, but DevMode
is now working. Go figure...
On Wednesday, September 26,
I've got it working!
See https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/jDg3KoXoVPc/9PcgFBvLJM8J
On Wednesday, September 26, 2012 12:49:08 PM UTC-4, Jambi wrote:
Hey guys,
today I was starting my gwt app in Chrome and there appears a message that
the dev plugin couldn´t be loaded. I
Thanks for the hint! I´ll try it later
Am Mittwoch, 26. September 2012 20:57:15 UTC+2 schrieb Thad:
I've got it working! See
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/jDg3KoXoVPc/9PcgFBvLJM8J
On Wednesday, September 26, 2012 12:49:08 PM UTC-4, Jambi wrote:
Hey guys,
today I was
Haven't a clue.
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 12:19 PM, Magnus alpineblas...@googlemail.comwrote:
Hi jchimene,
the thread your link points to suggests several settings. I first tried
adding the path, without change. Then I added both variables to eclipse.ini:
Hey,
I use the following persistence.xml now. I dont get a exception anymore but
I still dont get any records saved into my database either.
I also should see some SQL statements in my console if he would commit any
SQL, right? I dont see any SQL :(
If I change databasename or password to any
The incognito trick didn't work for me on mac osx chrome...
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/vCYGBAv6XtoJ.
To post to this group,
Workaround works for me, by downloading an older version, Chrome 21 on my
mac... Not ideal, but works...
http://mac.oldapps.com/google_chrome.php
1. download dmg
2. extract to desktop
3. rename to Chrome21
4. drag to applications
5. Run development mode, right click link and add browser,
The incognito trick didn't work for me on mac osx chrome... didn't work for
me either.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1840803/
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
LGTM, though I still wonder if you want -style PRETTY to be the default.
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1840803/
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
On 2012/09/26 18:51:33, jtamplin wrote:
LGTM, though I still wonder if you want -style PRETTY to be the
default.
It only increases the size of the zipped extension by about 5% (from
349k to 365k). I think I'd rather leave it on since it makes debugging
easier.
LGTM
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1840803/
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
For comparison, the Firefox extension is now a 7M download, due to
having a separate binary for each version of Firefox * three platforms.
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1840803/
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
41 matches
Mail list logo
