Hello,
my application uses a java library (jar). When debugging the application, I
would like to also step into the library code, but it's not available.
Both, the application and the library are maven projects. The library is
defined as a dependency in the application's pom.xml file. Both
Expand "Referenced Libraries" and locate the jar in your project inside
Eclipse.
Right-click the jar and select "Properties".
In the dialog that appears, select "Java Source Attachment" and complete
the form using the "Workspace location" option.
Hope this helps,
Rodolfo
On Mon, Apr 10, 2017
@Kirill: Do you have an example how the splitting will work?
Am Sonntag, 9. April 2017 10:54:50 UTC+2 schrieb Kirill Prazdnikov:
>
> Think about to split your app into several apps and interop between them
> via jsinterop. We did that and detach 1 mb of genersted js app.
>
> Our app is pretty
If you compile your gwt app with -generateJsInteropExports any @JsType is
accessible in global scope:
Exporting app:
package foo;
@JsType
public Bar {
public Baz baz = new Baz();
}
Consuming JS:
new Bar().baz.baz1();
Consuming gwt app ( No need for -generateJsInteropExports):
There is a whitelist / blacklist to control that.
On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 12:30 PM Kirill Prazdnikov
wrote:
> As far as I know this will add lots of GWT internal stuff which I not
> going to export. Right ?
>
> понедельник, 10 апреля 2017 г., 21:57:33 UTC+3 пользователь
W dniu 10.04.2017 o 10:46, Jens pisze:
Oh and be aware that GWT generators won't work anymore in GWT 3. So
you better use annotation processors for new code.
Thanks for the information.
Regards
J-23
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT
Users"
Alternatively you can probably also change your maven settings in Eclipse
to always download sources / javadoc artifacts as well (also useful for
stepping into 3rd party libs),
see:
That is a nice idea. Actually compiling modules as separate entities was
definitely something would helped. ModuleCompiler that was producing gwtar
output, but looks like it was dropped in 2.8.
Now I wonder if that approach is applicable to us. We have a pretty
extensive "common" module,
You can also use DOM Elememts as an interop types.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT
Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this
As far as I know this will add lots of GWT internal stuff which I not going
to export. Right ?
понедельник, 10 апреля 2017 г., 21:57:33 UTC+3 пользователь Daniel Kurka
написал:
>
> If you compile your gwt app with -generateJsInteropExports any @JsType is
> accessible in global scope:
>
>>
>>
Is anyone else having serious performance problems when stepping through
SDM code in chrome? The issue happens in cases where this is mapped to the
window object and chrome want to expand all the globals in the inspection
window.
There is a chrome issue logged
The approach is very simple and easy, you use you detached GWT app like any
other JS script.
Any GWT app is a JS script.
1st you need to define the interface of the detached module in terms of
JsInterop: isNative = true.
You can only use Strings, numbers, arrays and isNative = true interfaces.
> As far as I know this will add lots of GWT internal stuff which I not
> going to export. Right ?
>
If you are willing to use master branch you can apply filters during
compilation:
https://github.com/gwtproject/gwt/commit/9eda5dc418f9bdfef2fd21c6113e48dd10672beb
-- J.
--
You
Yeah expanding window isn't a great idea when using GWT, too much stuff
installed on window. There is (or was? not sure) a GWT compiler option to
install code on the window object using namespaces (I think based on
package structure). But could be that SDM never supported it.
Also, hitting a
This post never showed up in my gmail account.
Has it not bee approved?
Ed
On Monday, April 10, 2017 at 7:12:31 AM UTC-4, Ed wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> GWT 2.8
>
> I have a top menu bar and a side nav using gwt material.
>
> They both process click to a center HTML Panel.
>
> When I click a link inside
Oh and be aware that GWT generators won't work anymore in GWT 3. So you
better use annotation processors for new code.
-- J.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT
Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
Hi Guys ,
I want to populate a celltree from database without hard coding
sublevel/subtree my model looks have 3 fields
private int id;
private String designation;
private Integer parentId;
Thanks
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Hi,
GWT 2.8
I have a top menu bar and a side nav using gwt material.
They both process click to a center HTML Panel.
When I click a link inside the panel it takes over the whole screen.
I know I can use a frame to eliminate this problem.
I have tried:
- focuspanel
-wrapping html inside a div
GWT 3? It is real ?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT
Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to
Generators are executing at compile time, so no. Usually you would use an
abstract class or an interface as parameter to GWT.create() so the name of
the generated class should be irrelevant, it is an implementation detail.
The only way to configure generators is using annotations, GWT
Do you plan to open source your Typescript to Java generator ? Do you have
a time frame for that ?
I am interrested in that because I made one myself which I would not
continue if you open source your own. I can already see that we have some
decisions in common (like some similarities handling
> Do you plan to open source your Typescript to Java generator ?
>
elemental2 is generated from closure extern files and not typescript
definitions. However the generator should also support typescript
definitions by the time it is open sourced, at least it has been said in
this group.
--
22 matches
Mail list logo