Re: [gwt-contrib] GWT 2.8 RC1

Speaking for myself, a GWT 2.8.0 release that works, but uses too much memory compiling code, to be followed by GWT 2.8.1 with the memory fix, is better than waiting for an unknown amount of time until JDT is fixed. On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 8:46 AM, 'Goktug Gokdogan' via GWT Contributors <

Re: [gwt-contrib] GWT 2.8 RC1

To try to speed up the fix, maybe if people voted for the issue, it may help. I just cast my vote to get it fixed. On Wednesday, 28 October 2015 12:53:17 UTC, Paul Robinson wrote: > > Speaking for myself, a GWT 2.8.0 release that works, but uses too much > memory compiling code, to be followed

Re: [gwt-contrib] GWT 2.8 RC1

> The thing is, there's always a level of paranoia about GWT's impending > doom and apparent lack of activity shown in the gwt users group, and a > release coming at an unknown time helps to fuel that paranoia. > Maybe we should post everything in

Re: [gwt-contrib] GWT 2.8 RC1

Paul, do keep in mind that the latest in git (and the 2.8.0-SNAPSHOT in maven) is fairly stable. Some projects (for example, everything that Google makes) live off of trunk, and many projects upgrade to a snapshot, test that things are sane, and then 'pin' that build internally to keep running

Re: [gwt-contrib] GWT 2.8 RC1

On Wednesday, October 28, 2015 at 4:01:00 PM UTC+1, Jens wrote: > > > The thing is, there's always a level of paranoia about GWT's impending >> doom and apparent lack of activity shown in the gwt users group, and a >> release coming at an unknown time helps to fuel that paranoia. >> > > Maybe

[gwt-contrib] GWT 2.8 RC1

Hey guys. We are planning to make the release cut by next Monday to start testing sooner. Hopefully by the time we will complete most of the critical pieces for JsInterop. Also FYI, JDT has a huge memory problem with Java8 so doing a final

Re: [gwt-contrib] GWT 2.8 RC1

On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 8:25 AM, Thomas Broyer wrote: > > > On Wednesday, October 28, 2015 at 4:01:00 PM UTC+1, Jens wrote: >> >> >> The thing is, there's always a level of paranoia about GWT's impending >>> doom and apparent lack of activity shown in the gwt users group, and

Re: [gwt-contrib] GWT 2.8 RC1

> Will those people switch to Java 8 at the same time they upgrade to GWT > 2.8? I doubt it. > If (as I understand it) the leak only happens when using "-sourceLevel 8", > then I'm fine with a 2.8.0 without waiting for the fix (but a big bold > warning in the release notes), and a 2.8.1 as

Re: The future of GWT and functional programming on the web

That is excellent news. Thanks for all the hard work. On Wednesday, 28 October 2015 22:34:25 UTC, Thomas Broyer wrote: > > We just had a steering committee meeting a few hours ago, and 2.8 RC1 has > been scheduled for next week (I was a bit late so I missed the details > though) -- You

Re: The future of GWT and functional programming on the web

good news. thanks all On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 11:59 AM, steve Zara wrote: > That is excellent news. Thanks for all the hard work. > > > On Wednesday, 28 October 2015 22:34:25 UTC, Thomas Broyer wrote: >> >> We just had a steering committee meeting a few hours ago,

Re: SEO Google Crawlable experience ?

​BTW: i noticed in this link, that I should use #! still such that Google will crawl it, else it will not crawl it: https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/174993?hl=en Anybody any experience with it? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT

Remove client side javascript from server

Hi Everyone, For security reason, we don't want user be able to download client side javascript from web server. Instead, we want to package client side scripts into a chrome app (.crx) and hand it to user offline. So when visiting our web page, people who don't have this chrome app

Re: The future of GWT and functional programming on the web

Any word on what has happened here? It's now late October and we haven't seen a release for a year. On Friday, September 4, 2015 at 3:07:29 AM UTC-6, Jens wrote: > > According to the last steering group meeting minutes, the release of 2.8 > is only waiting for JsInterop 1.0 to be finalized.

Re: The future of GWT and functional programming on the web

We just had a steering committee meeting a few hours ago, and 2.8 RC1 has been scheduled for next week (I was a bit late so I missed the details though) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop

Re: SEO Google Crawlable experience ?

I have seen this page before. Where did you see that google requires #! (vs plain #) in its new scheme? One question is: What happens if I choose not to implement #! on my AJAX site? Answer: In the near term your pages may not appear properly in Google's search results pages. However, we are

Re: CellTree only expands on clicking icon

W dniu poniedziałek, 26 października 2015 15:24:54 UTC+1 użytkownik Jaron Shulver napisał: > > Hi, > > I want to have a CellTree which expands when you click anywhere on the > cell, not just on the icon. > I've found this in my project, but I don't remember even how it works:). Especially

Re: Next release

On Wednesday, October 28, 2015 at 6:32:28 AM UTC+1, bendg25 wrote: > > If you abstract out the integration point to start up the embedded server, > then it would be easy to swap it out. Why would you abstract it out? CodeServer is a tool that listens on a port and does HTTP, why would you