if i may add my 2 cents, i think that Places-Activities-Framework(PAF?
anyone? , each time somebody adds another component, and it's beginning to
be absurd, so why not go for PAF :) ). should NOT be considred as an MVP
framework, nor should be considered as history handling one.
for example our
and does jetty support that? btw what DOES jetty support in terms of jee? we
are planning for websphere 7..
On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 8:00 AM, Juan Pablo Gardella
gardellajuanpa...@gmail.com wrote:
Use a Servlet 3.0. You can configurate via annotations.
2011/7/2 iker casillas...@gmail.com
It
actually we've decided to abandon RequestFactory framework for the reason
that it cannot be ported elsewhere.
that is if we decided to have other clients such as silverlight/flex, those
won't have request factory capabilities . so it kinda binds us to gwt.
On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 12:56 PM, Robert
hi..
assume that i have a Dynamic Web Project configured with google sdk, which
references another project for domain classes, which itself references a 3rd
project for persistence utility classes.
i'm trying to use tomcat as debug servlet , but the only way i'm able to
reslove
actually i allready took a look at the dev guide, that's where i got the
idea from
i wish i had some example on how to use the RPC class in this way, i
understand i still gonna need to create a servlet to extend a remote servlet
only this time it would without any interfaces or async interfaces.
can i use it with my normal classes i'm looking for a way to have a
singleton class and obtain it from a shared location, said class will
contain, eventsbus,ActivityManager,ActivityMapper etc..
i also rely in many cases on static variable which are androgynous clases, i
failed to to see that
is there another way to reflective recursive search in a form?
it's just occured to me, that won't solve my problem with buttons and things
that are not editors.
it would the developer would have would have somehow annotated the element
of the widget with something and i would have to create a
i don't think sticking session applies here in case of clustering xsrf
protection as i understand it is meant to ensure each REQUEST came from the
actual client, and not adjacent website which activates your request via
javascript code injection (which cannot really get your cookie because of
i've been reading about security issues, although it make not seem related
embedding foreign javascript in gwt is considered a security risk, you
should look into that also.
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 3:39 AM, mike b mbaker.t...@gmail.com wrote:
The BIRT dev environment has a way of exporting
does this mean i cannot use validation if i'm not using requestFactory?
http://code.google.com/webtoolkit/doc/latest/DevGuideRequestFactory.html#validation
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 9:57 PM, Nick Chalko ncha...@google.com wrote:
GWT 2.4 beta include support for built in Validation take a look at
considering it's talking about requestfactory-server.jar hmm, pretty much
yea:) (is 2.4 THAT close?)
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 11:38 AM, Thomas Broyer t.bro...@gmail.com wrote:
Hmm, shouldn't it have been for trunk? I believe @ExtraTypes and
polymorphism support are not in 2.3, only in the
woo hoo! mabye i'll get to convince our CTO to use RF, he wants to avoid
that becouse he says if the client will be in sliverlight, that won't work.
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 7:27 PM, David Chandler drfibona...@google.comwrote:
We jumped the gun a bit, but 2.4 is pretty close to becoming latest
i think google should clarify it's own philosophy in a special article in
the developer guide, because as of right now , there way too many black
holes on the subject of transports and frameworks that use them
GWT-RPC
JSON
RequestFactory
AutoBeans
XML.
i know that autobeans and rtf both uses
if there's one thing haven't figured out completely it's the layouts, i
mean, i wanna use the DockLayoutPanel in the ui designer for example with
only 3 panels inside it (one containing a tree, and other textbox and the
last a table) , and yet i can't see the panels i've inserted.
what's more if
what do you mean by open api?
btw on a similar note, what's exactly Titanium Appcelerator , seems like a
every CTO's wet web dream.
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 1:13 PM, Thomas Broyer t.bro...@gmail.com wrote:
You're right. RequestFactory is a protocol whose wire-format is based on
JSON, just
are there ANY open api's in gwt?
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 5:01 PM, Thomas Broyer t.bro...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tuesday, July 19, 2011 12:18:58 PM UTC+2, Elhanan wrote:
what do you mean by open api?
A web API (similar to Twitter's API, GData API, etc.) that's clearly and
entirely specified
goodies and
things in the pipeline that can help you build an IT app. It also allows you
to integrate History Support although we are in the process of making this
also transparent.
Regards,
Alfredo
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 5:42 AM, Elhanan elh.maa...@gmail.com wrote:
hi..
i keep pondering
oh and we can't use GXT.
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 5:15 PM, Elhanan Maayan elh.maa...@gmail.comwrote:
before i check out, does this framework implements MVP on it's own? becouse
i don't want to duplicate the work of allready in GWT (for example MVP4G ,
which seems great but doesn't use places
i know i CAN use guice, but i CAN't use it, becouse our CTO is against
integrating anything else aside from GWT (yea i know using GWT alone is an
anti-pattern, but he doesn't want any added risks, hell he won't let us even
use Activity places)
so i was wondering if there is any underlying
but that's the thing i don't get, you refer to the point AFTER i persisted
the entity, but what i'm talking about is how do i GET the new changed
entity proxy so i could send it the persist method. i mean just using the
fire won't magically persist the thing. unlike the find method in the
entity
you mean keep a reference to ctx2 and call persist on it after the flush ,
becouse persist requires the proxy, i think i finally got the bit about
queing, and i'm going for the edit-persist sequence, and flush-fire (which
won't make much sense readability wise), but then again, neither is most of
ok let's assume i'm using the server side validation ,is there any easy to
get the control which has the wrong value (i'm assuming the use of path is
needed) from the editorError?
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 12:38 PM, Thomas Broyer t.bro...@gmail.com wrote:
RequestFactoryEditorDriver#flush simply
do you have any examples on DeobfuscatorBuilder and ServiceLayerDecorator ?
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 12:58 AM, Thomas Broyer t.bro...@gmail.com wrote:
If you're really sure about what you're doing, you can annotate the
property with @SkipInterfaceValidation; and if you need to generate the
ok, when does one find such information, i mean, clearly these kind of
things, even SkipInterfaceValidation do not appear on the developer guide,
is there a secret cabal of gwt-isters, gathering somewhere in the ether?
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 11:39 AM, Thomas Broyer t.bro...@gmail.com wrote:
A
i mean a SEPARATE validation framework, if i use eclipseLINK for example
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 10:31 PM, Patrick Julien pjul...@gmail.com wrote:
I use OpenJPA and I know it works, it's able to validate them.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
yes, and this is why i posted originally, i already seen these 2 and i was
wondering if i'm down between choosing something that is mature but 50%
slower then something of version 0.3 and in incubation mode..
On Sat, Dec 24, 2011 at 11:23 AM, Eric Charles
eric.umg.char...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
I
yes, it's called too-much-values-to-be-displayed-in-one-list...
On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 8:36 AM, -sowdri- sow...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there anything that 's preventing you from creating
a ValueListBoxDepartmentProxy)??
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
and btw here's what i thought of...
it's still in the rough, but basically it's a combination between
ValueListBox and SuggestionBox
(hence ValueSuggestionBox :) ), i've tried in my small sourceforge project
and seems to be working (at least with requestFactory EntityProxies), so
now i can use an
the
original error.
On Sun, Jan 1, 2012 at 1:56 AM, Thomas Broyer t.bro...@gmail.com wrote:
On Saturday, December 31, 2011 9:08:50 PM UTC+1, Elhanan wrote:
hi..
i'm trying use an entity employee which has JobHistory entities related
to it..i should add that although jobHistory is considered
check that, actually i a slightly different error only difference is
instead of JobHistory, i get JobHistoryPk can't be sent to the client.
On Sun, Jan 1, 2012 at 7:56 AM, Elhanan Maayan elh.maa...@gmail.com wrote:
ok, they really REALLY need to fix that thing, i changed the directory
, Elhanan elh.maa...@gmail.com wrote:
@Embeddable
public class JobHistoryPK implements Serializable {
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
@Column(name = EMPLOYEE_ID)
private Long employeeId;
@Temporal(TemporalType.DATE)
@Column(name = START_DATE)
private
the zero stuff is intended to be package level (hell i only placed because
rf),. but even with public ctor it doesn't work.
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 12:42 AM, Thomas Broyer t.bro...@gmail.com wrote:
Your zero-args ctor and getter are not public, is this intended? RF only
uses public members and
directly?
RF will ignore proxies it can't reach, (ie there's no method
returning/using them anywhere) but that shouldn't be the case unless they
are un-used. Can you post the place where the JobHistoryPKProxy is used ?
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 8:47 PM, Elhanan Maayan elh.maa...@gmail.comwrote:
yep
What about iT ?
On Jan 4, 2012 12:19 PM, Thomas Broyer t.bro...@gmail.com wrote:
How about the getStartDate()?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
You mean everything must be public?
On Jan 4, 2012 12:23 PM, Thomas Broyer t.bro...@gmail.com wrote:
The getStartDate() getter is not public in your class, but mapped on the
proxy.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To
*yea, i think there's a bug somewhere about it. *
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 7:26 PM, Thomas Broyer t.bro...@gmail.com wrote:
I suspect it's *Eclipse* which messes things up actually.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To view
lient/src/assembly/distribution.xml)
> so that I only packaged the JS files... and at the end I use the HTML files
> from the server part.
>
> IMHO it is always good to be able to implement the "client" without the
> server part. I always mock the whole "server part
/domino-rest-enum-date/blob/master/domino-rest-enum-date-server/src/main/resources/static/index.html
> which
> is a bit different.
>
> The main artifact from "client" is the JS file which you can insert
> everywhere in a HTML file (server, etc.)
>
> Elhanan schrieb am S
t;
> I'm not sure how the structure of your projects looks like?
> Elhanan schrieb am Sonntag, 18. Oktober 2020 um 17:28:19 UTC+2:
>
>> i'm assuming those 2 need to be in there own aggregator pom (i.e my main
>> parent pom will a web ui pom, which will have those submodules) ,
les everything first
> before it starts with gwt:devmode? ... Actually it doesn't need to, I
> agree... maybe @tbroyer could explain?
>
> Elhanan Maayan schrieb am So., 18. Okt. 2020,
> 23:58:
>
>> thanks, btw i don't understand why the maven plugin insists on compiling
>> it
.github.io/gwt-maven-plugin/codeserver.html#Standalone_applications
>
> On Sunday, October 18, 2020 at 5:03:21 PM UTC+2, Elhanan wrote:
>>
>> yes, i understand that gwt-maven-plugin is "opinionated" (i.e forces me
>> to do it) and i'm in the process of doing so, t
ook at that...
>
> Elhanan Maayan schrieb am Mo., 19. Okt. 2020,
> 10:00:
>
>> no i meant, that when i do regular compile i still see *.devmode.* files
>> on the target dir, and when i try to use just a normal server, it says it
>> can't see the codeserver.
>>
>
e last time I check it
> out)...
>
> If you want to completely separate everything you could go for:
>
> --modules
> mod1
> mod2
>
> --webui
> webui-client
> webui-server
>
> --builder-modules
>
> Elhanan schrieb am Sonntag, 18. Oktobe
don‘t
> care about the business logic on the server. You just need some *data
> examples* which you can mock easily with your DTO...
>
> Elhanan schrieb am Sonntag, 18. Oktober 2020 um 23:35:23 UTC+2:
>
>> essentially i could use all the real static files in the client side
>&
lient/src/assembly/distribution.xml
>
> You can add the CSS files to be added to the server module on deployment...
>
> But again, of course you can use gwt:codeserver instead of standalone
> gwt:devmode
> Elhanan schrieb am Sonntag, 18. Oktober 2020 um 22:53:31 UTC+2:
>
>&
what's the difference between
warDir, webappDirectory, workDir,workingDirectory, codeServerWorkDir ,
devModeWorkDir, tempDir?
i mean it's hard to follow all those around.
On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 2:58 PM Elhanan Maayan wrote:
> hey thomas, the thing is, i wanna do it right without any ha
, 2020 at 5:49 PM lofid...@gmail.com
wrote:
> Is it not possible to add those contents into an artifact with assembly
> for example? So that you can use it later for the dependency? I'm doing
> this in this example:
> https://github.com/gwtboot/domino-rest-enum-date
>
> Hope thi
it is not good to have "server" part and "client" part (web browser,
> GWT) in one Maven module... The best practice is always to separate them.
>
> I wrote some simple explanation in this project:
> https://github.com/gwtboot/domino-rest-enum-date with 3 Maven modules,
oject you get just JS file(s) and you
> can copy it somewhere else where you have a web server. I also already use
> "only" the JS file(s) and copy the automatically to NGinX without server
> part.
>
> Elhanan schrieb am Sonntag, 18. Oktober 2020 um 17:03:21 UTC+2:
>
te languages.
>
>
> On Saturday, July 11, 2020 at 1:22:04 PM UTC-6, Elhanan wrote:
>>
>> Actually i don't want to integrate much woth cockpit just want to call
>> out some rest api to another server. Why would it be hard?
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 9, 2020, 00:45 Roge
our cockpit project that is affecting your gwt
> code. You need to either change your cockpit's css to be more specific to
> cockpit (add specific class names instead ".div" for instance), or override
> those styles within your gwt code.
>
> On Tuesday, July 14, 2020 at 3:0
u want to program all the client-side logic
> using Java and integrate it with cockpit using JsInterop.
>
>
> On Wednesday, July 8, 2020 at 1:57:48 AM UTC-6, Elhanan wrote:
>>
>> hi.. we've been using a small gwt page we developed inside an old vmware
>> application tha
101 - 152 of 152 matches
Mail list logo
