While I never skipped so many versions with my own GWT applications, I
would assume this upgrade to be mostly transparent and go without many code
changes. Just replace the SDKs and check what your build process complains
about (if it complains at all).
On Tuesday, August 25, 2020 at 1:01:47
I know it is quite some time ago since you posted this, but I just now
(2020!) ran into the very same issue (using the very same workaraound). Is
there any real solution for this by now?
On Tuesday, August 22, 2006 at 2:32:24 AM UTC+2, StudyBlue wrote:
>
> Casting 'non-serializable' objects to
That made my day! I was encountering those issues a lot when using Lambda
expressions - and renaming a Lambda is rather difficult... Thanks!
On Wednesday, February 24, 2021 at 10:36:38 PM UTC+1 David Nouls wrote:
> I just browse to the sdm website at http://localhost:9876 and click on de
>
Works perfectly well. You might have to manually clean the compiler cache
from time to time though.
Hardik Shah schrieb am Mo. 1. März 2021 um 13:13:
> Hi All,
>
> Can we write lambda expression code in GWT 2.9?
> With basic testing, look like it is working correctly. I search on
>
Stopped using Eclipse plug-ins just recently when going to JDK11. Am using
Maven Jetty plugin to run code server and host the application.
It was a bit cumbersome to set up (steep Maven learning curve!) but was
worth it in the end: onboard a new developer in no time (if Maven is
already
I agree without reservation! Using GWT since 2011 and really glad to see
the 2.9 release working!
Tom Van Eetvelde schrieb am Mo. 19. Okt. 2020 um
12:54:
> Hi,
>
> I just wanted to say that I have been using GWT since 2009 and I never
> thought about sharing how much fun GWT has brought to my
Hi!
What makes you think this has anything to do with GWT? Your application is
not dependent on the browser.
Cheers
Ralph
Serena Roin schrieb am Di. 7. Nov. 2023 um 13:34:
> Being that GWT is unsupported on the recent browsers, and my PC has
> natively Windows 11, I've tried to launch my
why not use gwt-rpc? I am a lazy guy and am happily using it for more than
10 years now - I even use the generated serializers in combination with
WebSockets. What can possibly go wrong here...?
On Fri, May 20, 2022 at 3:57 PM Thomas Broyer wrote:
> Short answer: don't start using
I consider this as the biggest advantage: you keep type-safety across
client/server calls. If you do some breaking changes, the compiler will
tell you! I definitely prefer this above finding out at runtime…
You can always achieve higher levels of flexibility by adding abstraction
layers between
after cleaning up my projects a bit, migration from 2.9 completely
transparent - great job!
On Monday, June 27, 2022 at 10:25:28 PM UTC+2 RT wrote:
> Great to see this progress. Updated my project to 2.10 from 2.9, the only
> issue so far was removing the ie10 user agent in the gwt.xml,
>
Hi!
Seems like every long-time GWT user eventually comes to the point when
suddenly the ECLIPSE plugin (or any other familiar setup) stops working...
Without wasting too much time on trying to understand MAVEN I would suggest
forgetting about webAppCreator and the gwt:devmode integrated Jetty
@SuppressWarnings( "deprecation" )
Should do the trick, no?
Lorenzo Aditi schrieb am Sa. 30. Juli 2022 um
16:42:
> I migrated to gwt 2.8.1 and I am using gxt 2.2.5
>
> I am using the method onRender from
> com.exts.gxt.ui.client.widget.LayoutContainer:
>
>
Unless you want to create something based on css flex-layout and uibinder
yourself, it’s probably the easiest to combine 3 DockLayoutPanels (1 for
NE, E and SE, one for the center N and S, and finally one for the western
parts.
Abhishek Yadav schrieb am Do. 15. Sept. 2022 um
23:13:
> Hi,
>
>
Hi!
GWT has no dependencies to any app server. Just use your preferred one (and
look into your own code if you experience issues ;-))
Bon courage
Ralph
Valavanur Man schrieb am Di. 20. Sept. 2022 um 17:59:
> Hi,
>
> We are running GWT 2.8 with Glassfish4. We had issues trying to run the
> GWT
Hi Jenny!
With all these issues related to out-dated Eclipse plug-ins I would
strongly suggest switching to the new GWT Maven plug-in instead. Follow the
instructions https://github.com/tbroyer/gwt-maven-archetypes/ to create a
project that you can easily import into the most recent Eclipse (or
separate client side and server side code and other
> configuraitons.
>
> thanks,
> Jenny
>
> On Monday, July 10, 2023 at 11:59:01 PM UTC-5 Ralph Fiergolla wrote:
>
>> Hi Jenny!
>> With all these issues related to out-dated Eclipse plug-ins I would
>> strongly su
That is, as long as I stay within GWT there is no need to change (and loose
type checking and convenience). I will happily stay with GWT RPC then!
R
Jens schrieb am Mo. 24. Juli 2023 um 18:24:
>
> I think I asked the question before: as a long-term GWT-RPC user, what
> would be the benefit of
I think I asked the question before: as a long-term GWT-RPC user, what
would be the benefit of moving to some other RPC protocol/mechanism?
Thomas Broyer schrieb am Fr. 21. Juli 2023 um 12:34:
>
>
> On Friday, July 21, 2023 at 11:38:59 AM UTC+2 petr...@o3enterprise.com
> wrote:
>
> We have one
it happens with
> standard javascript is this correct ?
>
> [image: ErrorPskCallStack.png]
>
> Il giorno lunedì 4 dicembre 2023 alle 13:30:37 UTC+1 Ralph Fiergolla ha
> scritto:
>
>> If I am not mistaken, you are mixing up things a little: the issue you
>> were l
Fully agree - and very much like the example!
Leon Pennings schrieb am Fr. 12. Jan. 2024 um
14:59:
> I think moving away from gwt-rpc is a bad idea.
> A big advantage of GWT is that I can code everything in java and do not
> have to serialize anything to and from text.
> That to me is one of
Hi!
Since a big part of our string content comes from database records anyway,
we decided to go without any static texts but use dynamic labels. Initial
concerns about performance and memory footprint have proven to be
unfounded. That is, despite working in the context of European Institutions
If I am not mistaken, you are mixing up things a little: the issue you were
looking at here https://github.com/tbroyer/gwt-maven-plugin/issues/82 is
not about debugging the generated client part of your application, but
about the compiler that is actually generating the code you want to debug.
To
Finally! Thanks a lot!
Thomas Broyer schrieb am Mi. 24. Jan. 2024 um 19:57:
> oh, and GWT 2.11 with Jakarta Servlet and Jetty 11; so requiring at least
> Java 11.
>
> On Wednesday, January 24, 2024 at 7:55:33 PM UTC+1 Thomas Broyer wrote:
>
>> I updated modular-webapp (and
Don’t want to build up pressure, but yeah that would come in very handy
Craig Mitchell schrieb am Fr. 23. Feb. 2024 um
00:05:
> I know it's outside of its scope, but it would be great if
> https://github.com/tbroyer/gwt-maven-archetypes had an example of "If you
> want to create an executable
24 matches
Mail list logo
