Re: Really need help getting CodeServer to run with Java 11 and GWT 2.10

2024-04-15 Thread 'RobW' via GWT Users
Note sure if this will gelp you much - we're a Gradle user, and don't use intellij. But the basic principles are the same. When we migrated to the latest GWT we also updated our top level gradle build file to have a gwtSuperDev task which does all the heavy lifting for us: task

Re: GWT RPC call recognized as a Java Method Injection by Fortiweb

2023-07-26 Thread 'RobW' via GWT Users
Did y'all test DominoKit? It is actively maintained and has a REST module. > I'm curious if you did test it what shortcomings you may have run into. > > On Tuesday, July 25, 2023 at 9:23:53 AM UTC-4 RobW wrote: > >> We got to a similar point. Looked in depth at moving the GWT front

Re: GWT RPC call recognized as a Java Method Injection by Fortiweb

2023-07-25 Thread 'RobW' via GWT Users
We got to a similar point. Looked in depth at moving the GWT front end to a REST API - but found two big drawbacks: 1. none of the frameworks we could find had async callback handling similar to GWT-RPC, with common interface classes client server side AND support JAX-RS

Re: GWT compilation error with JDK 11

2023-07-12 Thread 'RobW' via GWT Users
I can't comment on the Eclipse plugin side of things, because we don't use those. But I can confirm that basic GWT 2.9/2.10 compilation works fine under Java 11 - that's our main Java platform now. I do recall some migration notes in the GWT 2.9 or 2.10 release notes we had to take care over,

Re: JavaFX for GWT

2022-11-09 Thread 'RobW' via GWT Users
Interesting stuff. Have looked at Vaadin and WebSwing (commercial) in the past - but yours is an interesting take/approach. Will be good to see how it progresses. On Wednesday, 9 November 2022 at 12:39:48 UTC Jonathan Franchesco Torres Bca wrote: > Hi, > > And what about JFC Swing which is

Re: Javascript module function in GWT with JsInterop

2021-04-21 Thread 'RobW' via GWT Users
2021 at 15:33:59 UTC+1 Thomas wrote: > Ok, cool. Coincidentally I also want to use CodeJar, so I can work that > out ;) Cheers! > > On Wednesday, April 21, 2021 at 10:25:48 PM UTC+8 RobW wrote: > >> From memory, I think we took the easy way around and fell back to the

Re: Javascript module function in GWT with JsInterop

2021-04-21 Thread 'RobW' via GWT Users
021 at 15:18:53 UTC+1 Thomas wrote: > Hi Rob, good to hear. How did you solve the import of the module? > > On Tuesday, November 3, 2020 at 1:19:53 AM UTC+8 RobW wrote: > >> Thomas has very kindly posted an answer to the above SO thread. So I >> think I'm good! >> >>

Re: Updated GXT for GWT 2.9.0 and Java 11

2021-02-25 Thread 'RobW' via GWT Users
BAD experience with their support, we paid the fee for > years, and in the last times we got a very LIMITED support! > > In any case, we are using GXT 4.0.2 and GWT 2.9.0 for a long time without > any issue, but we never tested it under Java 11... > > > On 25 Feb 2021, at 07:56

Updated GXT for GWT 2.9.0 and Java 11

2021-02-24 Thread 'RobW' via GWT Users
Not sure how many of you also use GXT, but just spotted an announcement from Sencha that GXT 4.1 is out, with support for GWT 2.9.0 and Java 11 (although the latter is marked as a "should support"). In the middle of some othe rwork, so have yet to try it in our setup. Will report back once we

Re: Our 10+ year journey with GWT (+ job opening)

2021-01-22 Thread 'RobW' via GWT Users
t >>> is 7) >>> >>> On Tuesday, January 19, 2021 at 5:26:38 PM UTC+1 lofid...@gmail.com >>> wrote: >>> >>>> @swas... >>>> >>>> >>>> Yes, almost 10 years for me too and production application running

Re: Our 10+ year journey with GWT (+ job opening)

2021-01-19 Thread 'RobW' via GWT Users
Our web front end is on 15 years with GWT as of this year, and we're expecting 5 more with luck. So we'll hit the 20 year mark if all goes well On Tuesday, 19 January 2021 at 10:46:44 UTC aka...@gmail.com wrote: > I wonder if that will actually last for the next 10 years. > > On Tuesday,

Re: Javascript module function in GWT with JsInterop

2020-11-02 Thread 'RobW' via GWT Users
Thomas has very kindly posted an answer to the above SO thread. So I think I'm good! On Monday, 2 November 2020 at 10:26:56 UTC RobW wrote: > Just re-posting a Q I put on SO today in case anyone here has insights: > > > https://stackoverflow.com/questions/64643227/javascript-mod

Javascript module function in GWT with JsInterop

2020-11-02 Thread 'RobW' via GWT Users
Just re-posting a Q I put on SO today in case anyone here has insights: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/64643227/javascript-module-function-in-gwt-with-jsinterop Basically, battling to figure how to integrate a library that is implemented as a Javascript export function using JS modules

Convenient way to obfuscate include JS files

2011-04-21 Thread RobW
Does anyone know a convenient, preferably build-time, way to obfuscate JS source files include as part of an external GWT module? I know GWT does a great job ob obfuscating the JS files it produces, but can't see any obvious way to have it do the same for JS files included as resources. I suspect

Re: Strange List serialization behaviour

2009-03-16 Thread RobW
We have services which have more than one method returning parameterised lists (using GWT 1.5.3). Any error messages? Yeah - I'm sure others do also, so it must be something odd we're doing. Only messages we've seen so far are the usual: [WARN] Field 'private final

Re: Strange List serialization behaviour

2009-03-16 Thread RobW
We have services which have more than one method returning parameterised lists (using GWT 1.5.3). Any error messages? Also we do see the following, but they don't seem like actuall errors: [java] Scanning for additional dependencies: file:/E:/Data/tas/

Re: Strange List serialization behaviour

2009-03-16 Thread RobW
Progress ... of a sort. I think this is something to do with the way we package our GWT service handlers into OSGi bundles. I don't really understand how the GWT serializer and proxy code works ... but ... the thing that is different about this new service handler class is that it exists in a

Re: Strange List serialization behaviour

2009-03-16 Thread RobW
Ah - looks like I'm not the first to hit this: http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit/browse_thread/thread/14e6c550dd125ec6/be34f1975e33ae11?lnk=gstq=osgi#be34f1975e33ae11 --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to

Re: Strange List serialization behaviour

2009-03-16 Thread RobW
And finally - here may be the solution: http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit/browse_thread/thread/3185cecb772f0f61/8be4bf5333017f3f?lnk=gstq=gwt+osgi+List#8be4bf5333017f3f Crossing fingers! --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you