My guess is that you would set up restful services on the server in ruby
and use the request builder in gwt to send Json
On Sep 22, 2012 8:04 PM, darkflame darkfl...@gmail.com wrote:
I am a prettyy experienced GWT developer, but have no knowledge of
Ruby...has anyone used them together?
I am
One thing for sure is that the code base is still being actively developed
if you look at the activity on the repository. It will be curious to see
how much talk there will be about GWT at this years Google IO.
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 10:50 AM, b0b pujos.mich...@gmail.com wrote:
The biggest
that is probably not a good sign.
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 8:26 AM, Roger Studner rstud...@gmail.com wrote:
I believe there are a total of … 0.. sessions about GWT.
Roger
On Apr 20, 2012, at 8:18 AM, Travis Camechis wrote:
One thing for sure is that the code base is still being actively
Spring Roo can help do this although it uses Request Factory as the
communication method.
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 12:41 PM, Umesh upadhyay.um...@gmail.com wrote:
How to integrate GWT with spring. Is there an archetype in maven which
can be used to build the structure of Sring, GWT, JPA
--
You should be able to use GWT RequestBuilder along with the GWT's JSON
support. That is how I have done it in the past.
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 7:05 PM, sonyt...@gmail.com sonyt...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
I am very new to GWT. I am trying to learn how i can communicate using
REST instead of RPC .
I have used GWTP a project I worked on and loved it. It doesn't require
all the boiler plate code that you have to write use the
ActivitiesAndPlaces model.
On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 10:42 AM, vehdra music veh...@gmail.com wrote:
I am creating a GWT application using GWT MVP as described here
(
Wasn't there a new theme created for GWT 2.3 ? Clear or Clean? Something
along those lines.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this
yeah, that is it. I found it as soon as I sent the email.
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 4:02 PM, Qian Qiao qian.q...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 03:51, Travis Camechis camec...@gmail.com wrote:
Wasn't there a new theme created for GWT 2.3 ? Clear or Clean? Something
along those lines
agreed
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 9:22 PM, Adligo sc...@adligo.com wrote:
I would recommend not using Struts with GWT, Struts (and Spring MVC)
are web 1.0 technologies. I would recommend using RPC for actions
that need to talk to the server using googles nice RPC framework.
If you have a
At some point in a project you have to move on, plus it hasn't been removed
yet, just deprecated.
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 10:05 AM, Christian Goudreau
goudreau.christ...@gmail.com wrote:
Well knowing that Java 7 is expected to be released mid
Awesome. This definitely has turned out to be a great release. I will do my
best to try and help support the spring side of things as well as any other
things that I could potentially aid.
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 7:29 AM, PhilBeaudoin
philippe.beaud...@gmail.comwrote:
We just released version
, Travis Camechis camec...@gmail.com wrote:
instead of using that I created my own custom Spring Security
SuccessHandlers and Failure Handlers that returns JSON back to the
client.
I then let the client handle the place management based on
success:true/false. At this point I can also send
instead of using that I created my own custom Spring Security
SuccessHandlers and Failure Handlers that returns JSON back to the client.
I then let the client handle the place management based on
success:true/false. At this point I can also send credentials back in the
JSON as well.
On Tue, Dec
To me the worst part about the third party frameworks is that the widgets
can get slow and clunky or they don't follow the GWT ways making it hard to
implement MVP.
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 11:35 AM, Baloe nielsba...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I wonder, is there anyone using Smart GWT? Or, any
/darrellmeyer/ext-gwt-30
2010/12/1 Travis Camechis camec...@gmail.com
To me the worst part about the third party frameworks is that the widgets
can get slow and clunky or they don't follow the GWT ways making it hard to
implement MVP.
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 11:35 AM, Baloe nielsba...@gmail.com
://www.slideshare.net/darrellmeyer/ext-gwt-30
2010/12/1 Travis Camechis camec...@gmail.com
To me the worst part about the third party frameworks is that the widgets
can get slow and clunky or they don't follow the GWT ways making it hard to
implement MVP.
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 11:35 AM
AWESOME
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 2:21 PM, Christian Goudreau
goudreau.christ...@gmail.com wrote:
Hell yeah !
Good work !
Cheers,
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 2:12 PM, David Chandler drfibona...@google.comwrote:
GWT 2.1 is here!
do I get this message ? The doc hasn't changed about MenuBar,
even content assist of eclipse propose MenuItem inside MenuBar.
Widget com.google.gwt.user.client.ui.MenuItem is not a subclass of GWTs
Widget class
Cheers,
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 2:30 PM, Travis Camechis camec...@gmail.comwrote
Yeah but it generates everything using the Requestfactory which is completey
different than dispatch
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 9:24 AM, Stefan Bachert stefanbach...@yahoo.dewrote:
Hi,
you could play with Spring Roo.
My last try with Roo was not successful with non trivial cases,
however,
I figured it out. I had to modify the resources section to include the
module xml file ( it was getting left out ) along with the source code for
the module. All is happy now.
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 1:09 PM, tc camec...@gmail.com wrote:
I am using the new maven plugin (http://google-web-
, Christian Goudreau goudreau.christ...@gmail.com
wrote:
There's no big plan for now, since features are moving a lot in trunk of
Gwt, but I can assure you that we will include every Gwt core features
that
we can.
Cheers,
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 6:26 PM, Travis Camechis camec
Requestfactory in its current form is perfect if your just manipulating
entities(finderrs, insert, delete, modify) but not dealing with lots of
business logic on the server side. I believe in GWT 2.1.1 it will probably
be a pretty good replacement as it will add features like caching and being
November)
Philippe
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 6:40 AM, Travis Camechis camec...@gmail.com
wrote:
Do you have to use Guice on the server side in order to use Dispatch or
can
you use Spring on the server side?
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 11:46 PM, Brendan Doherty
bren...@propertysimplified.com
will
build the project for you.
ContinuousIntegration
https://code.google.com/p/gwt-platform/wiki/ContinuousIntegration
Cheers,
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 10:23 AM, Travis Camechis camec...@gmail.comwrote:
How stable is the trunk version? Thinking about building it from scratch
at least until .5
, 2010 at 7:55 AM, Travis Camechis camec...@gmail.com
wrote:
good point. I forgot about the CI server.
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 10:29 AM, Christian Goudreau
goudreau.christ...@gmail.com wrote:
You should take a look at the CI builds instead, they are already build
from trunk.
As soon
, it would be hard to
summarise here. You should check out the wiki
http://code.google.com/p/gwt-platform/wiki/LibraryOverview
On Sep 30, 12:25 pm, Travis Camechis camec...@gmail.com wrote:
understand. We are mainly trying to figure out which MVP framework to
start
with but not sure which one
Thanks for you response. I think we will use GWTP along with 2.1M3+ so we
can take advantage of the cell widgets. Hopefully in doing so I will also
be able to make contributions to GWTP.
Travis Camechis
Software Engineer
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 2:01 PM, PhilBeaudoin
philippe.beaud
Does anyone know what the plan is for GWT-Platform with the upcoming 2.1
release? Will GWT-Platform integrate the new features or some of them?
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 4:04 PM, Bayard Randel k...@bestpractice.net.nzwrote:
Yes, I'm currently working on a GWTP project using 2.1M3 without any
no big plan for now, since features are moving a lot in trunk of
Gwt, but I can assure you that we will include every Gwt core features that
we can.
Cheers,
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 6:26 PM, Travis Camechis camec...@gmail.comwrote:
Does anyone know what the plan is for GWT-Platform
You can look at the expenses app. Right now it you have to look at the SVN
repository in order to look at it. Its under trunk/samples. I believe it
will eventually in up in the showcase examples.
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 2:58 PM, skippy al.leh...@fisglobal.com wrote:
I would like to see a
yep the expenses app uses them along with the new MVP framework.
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 4:12 PM, Gal Dolber gal.dol...@gmail.com wrote:
I am almost sure there are some examples in the showcase on trunk
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 3:15 PM, Travis Camechis camec...@gmail.comwrote:
You can look
for mvn gwt:compile.
Any advice?
On Sep 7, 10:07 am, Travis Camechis camec...@gmail.com wrote:
try running tools/scripts/maven_script.sh from the root of the GWT
checkout. This will build a current copy of GWT and them to your local
maven repo. You should then be able to do a mvn compile
try running tools/scripts/maven_script.sh from the root of the GWT
checkout. This will build a current copy of GWT and them to your local
maven repo. You should then be able to do a mvn compile, mvn
gwt:compile, mvn gw:run.
On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 9:08 AM, superdama zack...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
Will you be able to use both RequestFactory and RPC at the same time? For
example using some third party API's may still require RPC.
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Ray Ryan rj...@google.com wrote:
It was probably a premature move, though the sample will likely require Roo
trunk pretty
wouldn't it be 1.1.0M3 instead of M2?
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 6:58 PM, BobV b...@google.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 3:56 PM, rj...@google.com wrote:
Push back roo to a released version.
LGTM
--
Bob Vawter
Google Web Toolkit Team
--
gotcha
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 8:08 PM, Ray Ryan rj...@google.com wrote:
I know that M2 works.
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 5:06 PM, Travis Camechis camec...@gmail.comwrote:
wouldn't it be 1.1.0M3 instead of M2?
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 6:58 PM, BobV b...@google.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010
gotcha, that took care of it. I guess this was to help out with there new
maven approach. Pretty cool
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 9:15 PM, BobV b...@google.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 6:08 PM, tc camec...@gmail.com wrote:
I am getting lots of errors when attempting to do a mvn compile on
Is the Request Factory going to in some way be a replacement for normal RPC
or are there some cases where you have to use RPC still?
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 4:26 PM, Thomas Broyer t.bro...@gmail.com wrote:
On 30 août, 20:22, tc camec...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there a way yet in GWT 2.1 to use
try
http://google-web-toolkit.googlecode.com/svn/2.1.0.M3/eclipse/plugin/3.5/
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 3:23 PM, Rokesh rjan...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm giving gwt2.1 m3 a try with my current code (http://
twiggered.appspot.com), which was built with gwt 2.1 m2).
I had to change some things
Yeah, I did send it 5 days and yeah it has been fixed, However, I am still
getting a failed build. Looks like the JPA class are somehow not on the
classpath.
package javax.persistence does not exist on all Domain objects.
during the compile of the samples/expenses app
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at
get right on it.
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 9:38 AM, Travis Camechis camec...@gmail.comwrote:
Yeah, I did send it 5 days and yeah it has been fixed, However, I am still
getting a failed build. Looks like the JPA class are somehow not on the
classpath.
package javax.persistence does not exist
for us here. Is your tools directory stale?
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 9:46 AM, Travis Camechis camec...@gmail.comwrote:
no prob, just wanted to make sure it wasn't something I was doing or if it
was a real problem
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 12:45 PM, Ray Ryan rj...@google.com wrote:
Oops. That's
:
Actually, it's working for us here. Is your tools directory stale?
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 9:46 AM, Travis Camechis camec...@gmail.com
wrote:
no prob, just wanted to make sure it wasn't something I was doing or if
it was a real problem
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 12:45 PM, Ray Ryan rj
to be built from default Ant targets).
Expense can be built with Maven 2.2.1 at the mean time.
The required libs are supposed to be in tools, but GWT team decided to
not add them to tools (I guess because the appengine jars are
changing).
On Aug 25, 12:39 pm, Travis Camechis camec...@gmail.com
so after taking a look at the idea behind the requestFactory and using
Service Objects instead of mapping directly to a domain object there will be
a RequestFactoryServletHelper on the server side that will decide if it
should go to a Domain Object or an actual Service object based on a client
45 matches
Mail list logo
