Is this (see below) still true with GWT 2.0.5? I'm guessing it is based on
my test of having a generator create a JSO -- it fails the compilation
step. It would be great if this limitation could be overcome.
On Tuesday, June 23, 2009 5:45:58 AM UTC-4, Thomas Broyer wrote:
Note that you
I've got a simple layout with a VerticalPanel nested inside a
DockLayoutPanel. There are three widgets in the VerticalPanel: the
first and third ones have an explicitly set height in EM units. The
middle widget has a height of 100%. I expect the VerticalPanel to
fill the entire space given it,
OK, I figured out that if I surround each widget declaration inside the
VerticalPanel with g:cell/g:cell tags, I can use the cell height
property on the second cell like this: g:cell height='100%'.
That makes my layout do what I want.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to
found:http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=5245
You could workaround it by hiding the previous panel instead of
removing it. Or you can call forcelayout recursively...
On Sep 8, 3:42 pm, mjeffw mjeffwil...@gmail.com wrote:
I have an application that contains two
I have an application that contains two screens, both of which are
using DockLayoutPanel as their outermost container.
The app is using Standards mode, and I am adding the panels to the
RootLayoutPanel with code that looks like this:
// container is my RootLayoutPanel
Inner anonymous classes have full access to the private members of the
enclosing class. I haven't gotten to this point in the tutorial yet,
but the only way I believe that this compiles is that symbol is a
member of the outer class (probably StockWatcher.java, yes?). So this
code can see any
