https://groups.google.com/forum/m/?fromgroups#!topic/google-web-toolkit/uibTKAPXWV0
Here is more info from Google about GWT. :)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
After evaluating many different technologies, i'm starting an
ambitious project with GWT for our company.
Even knowing what i know about the uncertainty of its future, i'm
still choosing it. Because nothing really comes close in terms of
high performing enterprise web app development.
I'd hope
I've decided to go with GWT as well. It's mature and solid. It
integrates really well javascript and there are many important related
projects (like PhoneGap integration). Ray's comments regarding
ongoing efforts have been very helpful. I'm particularly anxious to
try out Elemental. I've been
Hey Ray, how about that Hangout? :)
On Saturday, April 21, 2012 3:23:03 AM UTC+3, Ray Cromwell wrote:
If I told you the number of monthly active GWT developers, I think you
would be quite impressed. A hangout sounds like a good idea, I will look
into setting one up soon.
-Ray
On
+1
--
Daniel Guermeur
w +1 512 346 0360 m +1 512 554 6727
www.metadot.com the maker of www.daskeyboard.com and www.mojohelpdesk.com
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 10:24 AM, Joshua Kappon shuky.kap...@gmail.comwrote:
Hey Ray, how about that Hangout? :)
On Saturday, April 21, 2012 3:23:03 AM UTC+3,
+1
Em segunda-feira, 23 de abril de 2012 12h55min27s UTC-3, Jmscavaleiro
escreveu:
We are investing our time, our job and our life on/with GWT so we need
to be more informed and we need to know with what we can count.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Don't know if anyone has posted this link yet, but here goes.
https://plus.google.com/110412141990454266397/posts/8nmmgp4AChM
Not quite a roadmap, but it IS signs of external communication. :) I'm not
as worried anymore.
I'm betting that we'll see some really cool stuff out of IO.
On Monday,
We are investing our time, our job and our life on/with GWT so we need
to be more informed and we need to know with what we can count.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to
A paragraph or two every couple of months about what you are working on would
make a huge difference.
Trey
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
I honestly do not think that GWT is dying.
The community is very large, and we need answers, especially for new
projects!!!
For all this, Ray thank you very much for the comments, have given us an
interesting perspective, we look forward to news good!
A.U.S Cristian Rinaldi
Teléfono Móvil: (0342)
If Google can provide GWT support service, that will be super, which
is a win-win for companies who has GWT in production and Google GWT
development team.
Jim
On Apr 22, 10:59 am, Cristian Rinaldi cristian.rina...@logikas.com
wrote:
I honestly do not think that GWT is dying.
The community is
On Sunday, April 22, 2012 6:21:33 PM UTC+2, Jim wrote:
If Google can provide GWT support service, that will be super, which
is a win-win for companies who has GWT in production and Google GWT
development team.
If you need support, we're here: http://www.atolcd.com ;-)
--
You received
Great! Thanks for Ray, looking forward hearing from you.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/F_zzFyjpQYMJ.
To post to this group,
Thanks Ray. Even this small piece of information affects my decisioning
and comfort level. Thanks.
Blake McBride
On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 5:50 AM, Joshua Kappon shuky.kap...@gmail.comwrote:
Great! Thanks for Ray, looking forward hearing from you.
--
You received this message because you
Just phew
Back to regularly scheduled programming.
E
On Friday, April 20, 2012 6:28:16 PM UTC-4, Ray Cromwell wrote:
Over the past year, the GWT team did lose some people (Ray Ryan/Bob
Vawter), some moved to other projects, and some recently left for a startup
(Bruce/Joel/Kelly).
I don't see GWT getting killed or going anywhere anytime soon. I see tons
of development on it from quite a few different employees all over the
world.
I think they could nip this in the bud getting some employees to drip a
little more info into the blogs on random topics now and then.
--
The two GWT founders, Bruce Johnson and Joel Webber, have left Google and
are creating a new startup:
http://www.monetology.com/team
On Thursday, April 19, 2012 9:11:38 PM UTC+2, Supercobra Thatbytes wrote:
Obviously something is happening.
One of the first thing you do as a team lead of a
That is one awful looking website.
*eats popcorn*
On Apr 20, 2012, at 2:22 AM, Luc Claes wrote:
The two GWT founders, Bruce Johnson and Joel Webber, have left Google and are
creating a new startup:
http://www.monetology.com/team
On Thursday, April 19, 2012 9:11:38 PM UTC+2, Supercobra
+1
On Monday, April 2, 2012 5:19:16 PM UTC+2, Joshua Kappon wrote:
With the rise of the new developers.google.com, and with Google trying to
rally up developers using Google technologies and products, and the rise of
Dart and unclear future of GWT, I think it's about time that Google will
On Wednesday, April 11, 2012 6:57:31 PM UTC+2, Trey Roby wrote:
There is a significant difference between having to watch the GWT
Contributor Google group and an official post to the GWT blog. Not
posting to the official blog is surely a sign of internal GWT
problems. A healthy project is
+1
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options,
Hi all,
Please tell me anybady How to communicate with database using GWT with
requestFactory ,
please tell me ASAP.
Thaks Regards
Laxman
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 1:30 PM, dominikz dominik.zalew...@gmail.comwrote:
For over a year I was trying to convince my customers (that I develop
+1
I think GWT is a great tool. If google don't kill it then sooner or later
all companies will be looking into it. Google should not drop products in a
hurry, if it wants to build a reputation like No body has lost a job if
he/she has selected Google product. I hope google's senior management
The biggest problem with web frameworks is that you have no visiblity into
their future.
And the fact that sometimes Google does not hesisate to can products
doesn't help.
The is very must unlike say J2EE which existed 10 years ago and that you
can mostly be guaranteed will still exist in 10
One thing for sure is that the code base is still being actively developed
if you look at the activity on the repository. It will be curious to see
how much talk there will be about GWT at this years Google IO.
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 10:50 AM, b0b pujos.mich...@gmail.com wrote:
The biggest
I believe there are a total of … 0.. sessions about GWT.
Roger
On Apr 20, 2012, at 8:18 AM, Travis Camechis wrote:
One thing for sure is that the code base is still being actively developed if
you look at the activity on the repository. It will be curious to see how
much talk there will
that is probably not a good sign.
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 8:26 AM, Roger Studner rstud...@gmail.com wrote:
I believe there are a total of … 0.. sessions about GWT.
Roger
On Apr 20, 2012, at 8:18 AM, Travis Camechis wrote:
One thing for sure is that the code base is still being actively
One of the links posted in this thread some time ago lead to Ray Cromwell's
g+ post about new GWT features. I believe he will be presenting this on
Google I/O (as he is each year).
Btw. where did you get the info with '0' session on GWT on Google I/O. I
can't seem to find it on conference
Sessions haven't been officially posted yet.
On the G+ thread, someone said they had emailed the google IO support
email to ask if there was any GWT specific sessions. They told him
that they could neither confirm or deny that sessions were planned.
To which, his boss told him that purchasing
Over the past year, the GWT team did lose some people (Ray Ryan/Bob
Vawter), some moved to other projects, and some recently left for a startup
(Bruce/Joel/Kelly). One of our team members went for maternity leave, as a
result, we didn't have enough resources to simultaneously focus on the
Awesome. Thanks for the update.
--
Daniel Guermeur
w +1 512 346 0360 m +1 512 554 6727
www.metadot.com the maker of www.daskeyboard.com and www.mojohelpdesk.com
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 5:28 PM, Ray Cromwell cromwell...@google.comwrote:
Over the past year, the GWT team did lose some people
Thanks for commenting Ray (and also for keeping us posted on G+) - Super draft
mode looks great,
and I can't wait to see what else you got up your sleeves.
I understand that the GWT team is regrouping, and hope you'll keep us posted.
I also feel, that the community wants to be more informed and
If I told you the number of monthly active GWT developers, I think you
would be quite impressed. A hangout sounds like a good idea, I will look
into setting one up soon.
-Ray
On Friday, April 20, 2012 4:15:27 PM UTC-7, Joshua Kappon wrote:
Thanks for commenting Ray (and also for keeping us
Thanks, Ray!
I know about your passion for GWT.
Regards.
- Andrés
El viernes, 20 de abril de 2012 21:23:03 UTC-3, Ray Cromwell escribió:
If I told you the number of monthly active GWT developers, I think you
would be quite impressed. A hangout sounds like a good idea, I will look
into
+1
On Wednesday, April 18, 2012 4:48:52 AM UTC+8, emurmur wrote:
I'm one of the fence sitters.
I have been using Flex/Flash, which has been fantastic, but has no
future on the mobile web. I think there are only two mature tools
that would allow me to create similarly rich applications;
Here is my own personal opinion about what is going on.
Initially Google was totally dedicated to GWT. It is a great platform
loved by Google and many others.
Oracle is suing Google over Java. Google doesn't know where this is going
to end and is, quite frankly, sick of the idea that Oracle
I have an additional comment.
Although I see Google dropping GWT when Dart becomes ready for prime time,
I believe GWT will live on as a community project. Additionally, given
Google's internal use of GWT, Google is likely to at least minimally
support GWT (for its own needs at least) for a
Obviously something is happening.
One of the first thing you do as a team lead of a project that is going to
disappear is to remove the developer relations people and reassign team
members, which both have been happening in the GWT team. David Chandler,
GWT developer relations left the team
Interesting idea, but the issue is that Oracle is suing Google over its
use of Dalvik in Android - the basis of the case is that Dalvik breaks
the licensing terms of a JDK. Although I totally agree that this may
well spread FUD in the long term which will cost Oracle more that it
makes out of
GWT 2.5 was supposed to be released in first quarter of 2012 which already
passed.
Anybody knows why it was not released yet?
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 12:45 AM, Alan Chaney a...@mechnicality.com wrote:
Interesting idea, but the issue is that Oracle is suing Google over its
use of Dalvik in
Google needs to step up to the plate. If you want to be the caretaker for
GWT and you want me (and other developers to use it), I need to know what
you have planned. While I'm working on one GWT project now, I will not use
it on others until I know what is planned. I need to know what
+1
no feedback from googlers ??? look like people who bet on GWT is out of
luck now.
i start getting nervous right now
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 6:52 PM, Mike Dee mdichiapp...@gmail.com wrote:
Google needs to step up to the plate. If you want to be the caretaker for
GWT and you want me (and
I would expect a certain amount of radio-silence in the few months leading
up to Google I/O.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
With all the turn over and David Chandler moving to the Andriod team...
Who are the Developer Relations person(s) working on the Web Toolkit
product?
--
-- A. Stevko
===
If everything seems under control, you're just not going fast enough. M.
Andretti
--
You received this message
Two weeks later and not a single reply by a GWT developer? On any open
source project that would be enough to scare users away.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 9:48 PM, Yeroc cpuff...@gmail.com wrote:
Two weeks later and not a single reply by a GWT developer? On any open
source project that would be enough to scare users away.
According this google+ post:
https://plus.google.com/u/0/117361110923472794003/posts
'The
I'm one of the fence sitters.
I have been using Flex/Flash, which has been fantastic, but has no
future on the mobile web. I think there are only two mature tools
that would allow me to create similarly rich applications; GWT and
Closure Tools. Google has decided that Javascript won't cut it
GWT is the very good framework which gives you flexibility to use their
in-built widgets or functionality as well allow to work on low level API or
customize framework to your need like compiler linker etc. My company does
100% in GWT and Java. Using only one standard language for both server and
According to Google code blog article, Dart can be translated in Javascript
to obtain borwsers compliance,
http://googlecode.blogspot.it/2011/10/dart-language-for-structured-web.html
Dart code can be executed in two different ways: either on a native virtual
machine
Honestly, everything sounds to me like a political choice to force people to
shift from java platform develepment to Dart platform, leveraging the huge
Android diffusion through cellphones and tablets.
OK yeah sure maybe it is political but ...
What if Oracle wins big against Google in terms
I actually think that the whole mess with Dart is actually to develop a
single platform for both Google products: Android and Chrome.
Imagine that in a couple of years you could write in the same language both
native (to Android) and browser applications. Wouldn't it make be great? Of
course
I personally believe that someone at Google decided GWT is too complicated
for web developers out there and has failed the test of getting traction (I
know a lot of people are using it, but I think they were aiming for a
number similar to the JS community).
I personally think that Dart is out
GWT is the best thing I've ever come across as a web programmer. My company
does 100% in GWT and Java. Using only one standard language for both server and
client that works on all browsers is brilliant and unigue.
Google, please realize that GWT is awesome and put all your great efforts into
+1 (for whatever it's worth), totally agree, one language AND it's Java,
with all the tools that come with it
+ it's fast, very fast
On Sunday, 15 April 2012 19:41:14 UTC+2, Carl wrote:
GWT is the best thing I've ever come across as a web programmer. My
company does 100% in GWT and Java.
+1 GWT is too complicated. I think even for experts in GWT and/or Java you
would have to admit that GWT is quite verbose which turns off alot of JS
developers. From what I have seen, Dart looks to be the evolution of GWT.
But it still has a longs way to go to be as mature as GWT.
On Sunday,
+1
How we can trust in Google APIs and services (AppEngine for example) if
they leaves a wide used framework like GWT? Sorry, but you lost
credibility. I know, GWT is Open Source and free as a free beer, but this
abandon is a mistake.
Please, we need feedback.
Regards.
- Andrés
El lunes, 2
I hope Google IO will be a good opportunity for the GWT team to announce
new things and update us.
However it's never a good sign when a team of developers is not reaching
out to their audience. Uncertainty, this feels like. Yeeess.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to
I believe you are being over-pessimistic.
In my company we are using GWT since 2006 and we have build pretty large
and complicated web-apps using GWT. Some webapps created in 2006 (using GWT
1.2) are still being used today without any problem on any modern browser.
Normally old stuff keeps
On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 10:05 PM, Frank frank.wyna...@gmail.com wrote:
I believe you are being over-pessimistic.
In my company we are using GWT since 2006 and we have build pretty large and
complicated web-apps using GWT. Some webapps created in 2006 (using GWT 1.2)
are still being used today
I agree 100% with your assessment of alternative technologies, and
agree that GWT is really the only solution for developing complex web
applications. The only alternative is a 100% Javascript solution (for
example using Closure tools). With Dart, Google have acknowledged that
Javascript isn't
++1
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 7:58 PM, Jmscavaleiro jmscavale...@gmail.comwrote:
+1
On Apr 2, 4:19 pm, Joshua Kappon shuky.kap...@gmail.com wrote:
With the rise of the new developers.google.com, and with Google trying
to
rally up developers using Google technologies and products, and the
I strongly disagree with this. First of all browser technology and HTML
are in constant flux. If GWT is not updated, it will very soon become
out-of-date (bugs in new browsers) and unusable (reliably usable over a
broad base of browsers and platforms). Secondly, building apps with GWT is
a full
+1.
Lets do small rally!!. I know it sounds weird.but at least group of 20
people in front of Google head office. let me know. we can create poll who
ever is interested can join. Google will at least get some attention...
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 3:39 AM, Nagin Kothari
For over a year I was trying to convince my customers (that I develop
programs for) to use GWT with their SAP system. The technologies available
over there are WebDynpro for ABAP or Business Server Pages, which do not
even know what AJAX is.
In January I managed to do that. We just finished
GWT will also not go away...
If you have downloaded GWT on your computer you just can keep using it even
years after Google has dropped GWT...
Just like you still can program in QuickBasic or something.
GWT doesn't need anything from Google on the web to operate.
I will just keep using GWT if
In my opinion Dart is overstimated by Google, I can't see why competitors
like Microsoft and Mozilla should give a hand to Dart.. Just because Google
says it can be better than javascript? Chrome can be one of the best
browser on the market, and it can be the most used, but it will never be
the
+1
On Apr 2, 4:19 pm, Joshua Kappon shuky.kap...@gmail.com wrote:
With the rise of the new developers.google.com, and with Google trying to
rally up developers using Google technologies and products, and the rise of
Dart and unclear future of GWT, I think it's about time that Google will
I understand (and do that), but I think GWT should get more attention from
Google, and that it is not enough.
GWT is amazing, absolutely amazing. Google has developer advocates that are
helping with the G+ platform, android, Chrome web store, chromium OS and
more, they publish new content, hear
There is a significant difference between having to watch the GWT
Contributor Google group and an official post to the GWT blog. Not
posting to the official blog is surely a sign of internal GWT
problems. A healthy project is going to have official updates.
We are very tied to GWT and think it
+1
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 10:27 PM, Trey Roby rob...@gmail.com wrote:
There is a significant difference between having to watch the GWT
Contributor Google group and an official post to the GWT blog. Not
posting to the official blog is surely a sign of internal GWT
problems. A healthy
+1
kl. 17:19:16 UTC+2 mandag 2. april 2012 skrev Joshua Kappon følgende:
With the rise of the new developers.google.com, and with Google trying to
rally up developers using Google technologies and products, and the rise of
Dart and unclear future of GWT, I think it's about time that Google
+1
I stuck my neck out for GWT - I think it's a great concept. But without any
news, plans, or long term commitment, I think it's pretty risky to throw
man-months of development behind it. There are other options for web
development where I have more control over what will be available in 3+
If you watch the GWT Contributor Google group, you can see what is being
reviewed/worked on, what is getting committed to trunk and what not...
On Wednesday, April 4, 2012 1:04:15 PM UTC-4, Trey Roby wrote:
It has been about 4 months since Ray's post on what the GWT team is
working on. In
No attention on this yet? I can't +1 it without G+, right?
2012/4/5 Joshua Kappon shuky.kap...@gmail.com
here is my original Google+ post:
https://plus.google.com/u/0/117852058882395554716/posts/iQnNfC2BkxA
I'm aiming to get some response from Google - You can really help out by
re-sharing
+1 !
On Monday, April 2, 2012 6:19:16 PM UTC+3, Joshua Kappon wrote:
With the rise of the new developers.google.com, and with Google trying to
rally up developers using Google technologies and products, and the rise of
Dart and unclear future of GWT, I think it's about time that Google will
here is my original Google+ post:
https://plus.google.com/u/0/117852058882395554716/posts/iQnNfC2BkxA
I'm aiming to get some response from Google - You can really help out by
re-sharing and +1'ing it,
and contributing your comments there also.
Hopefully if we'll unite and be loud at some
It has been about 4 months since Ray's post on what the GWT team is
working on. In that time there has been only one GWT official blog
update and no releases for 6 months.
After reading the link that Alan suggested, I am encouraged but on
slightly since the post is several months old. There needs
Alan,
Thanks as always for your courteous replies. I'm grateful for the efforts
the Google developers put into GWT, as any other enterprise building such a
framework would most certainly charge the Earth for it while also crippling
its functionality in exchange for customer lock-in. Google
While I think that the GWT community is one of the best ones out there and
I have no doubt about our ability to pick this up should it ever be dropped
by Google, I have to agree with Joseph. I've already been told a few times
that the future of GWT is uncertain. Again, while I know and I am
+1
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 10:42 AM, Alfredo Quiroga-Villamil laww...@gmail.com
wrote:
While I think that the GWT community is one of the best ones out there and
I have no doubt about our ability to pick this up should it ever be dropped
by Google, I have to agree with Joseph. I've already
Hi Joseph
On 04/03/2012 08:34 AM, Joseph Lust wrote:
Alan,
Thanks as always for your courteous replies. I'm grateful for the
efforts the Google developers put into GWT, as any other enterprise
building such a framework would most certainly charge the Earth for it
while also crippling its
+ 1...
Working on web apps since web came to existence asp, jsp, cgi, DHTML,
javascript, struts and it was a real mess and did not truly enjoy it.
Also,apps created were error prone with code bloat and good design was
messy and a challenge.
The power of true OO, with Java, generics and
With the rise of the new developers.google.com, and with Google trying to
rally up developers using Google technologies and products, and the rise of
Dart and unclear future of GWT, I think it's about time that Google will
rethink the all We don't and won't have a road map, and there are no
On 04/02/2012 08:19 AM, Joshua Kappon wrote:
With the rise of the new developers.google.com, and with Google trying
to rally up developers using Google technologies and products, and the
rise of Dart and unclear future of GWT, I think it's about time that
Google will rethink the all We don't
Dear Alen.
In my opinion, if Google would stop working on it, then GWT's future is unclear.
It might be adopted by the contributors and it also might be droped after
sometime. The problem is you never know.
I personally think it won't be droped any time soon, since Google is heavly
vested in
On Monday, April 2, 2012 6:30:14 PM UTC+3, Alan Chaney wrote:
On 04/02/2012 08:19 AM, Joshua Kappon wrote:
With the rise of the new developers.google.com, and with Google trying
to rally up developers using Google technologies and products, and the
rise of Dart and unclear future of GWT,
86 matches
Mail list logo
