I would also like to point you to
http://jqueryui.com/themeroller/
Choose Gallery on the left.
For mobile Clients there is an equivalent site on http://jquerymobile.com/
Regards, CL
On 16 Aug., 13:08, ChrLipp christian.l...@corba.at wrote:
I appreciate the direction theGWTteam is heading.
I
I appreciate the direction the GWT team is heading.
I also would like to see increased support for mobile clients on GWT
too with native controls (HTML5) for the major plattforms (android,
iPhone, ..)
Samples could be found under
- http://jquerymobile.com/designs/
-
about #2 there is absolutely no documentation on css and uibinder from
a designer point of view.
For example any half decent designer nowadays would use div and span
to create nice layout, while all gwt panels are still using nested
tables.
You can definitely just do most of your layout with
We're developing a web 2.0 style app with gwt.
I cannot post url here (not yet) but the goal is something like
basecamp or twitter, nothing to do with desktop style widget (also
cool ones like vaadin).
Our experience so far:
1. UiBinder is much better than try to create our own widget by code.
2.
We're developing a web 2.0 style app with gwt too, using the
UiBinder to construct our panels and the GQuery API to interact with
them ( that can be learned more about in here http://code.google.com/p/gwtquery/
).
Is there any chance that the GQuery will be included on the GWT core?
On Aug 12,
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 7:49 PM, Thiago Miranda de Oliveira
thiago...@gmail.com wrote:
We're developing a web 2.0 style app with gwt too, using the
UiBinder to construct our panels and the GQuery API to interact with
them ( that can be learned more about in here
+1 for gwtquery on gwt core. ;-)
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 5:13 PM, Manuel Carrasco Moñino
man...@apache.orgwrote:
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 7:49 PM, Thiago Miranda de Oliveira
thiago...@gmail.com wrote:
We're developing a web 2.0 style app with gwt too, using the
UiBinder to construct our
I found Vaandin simply Great:
1) Easy to use
2) Cristal clear architecture
3) Exellent Documentation
2010/8/11 Kevin Qiu kevin.jing@gmail.com
+1 for Vaadin.
Their widgets are very polished and professional. GXT and SmartGWT are fine
but they're too desktop-looky, not Web2.0 looky...
+1 for Vaadin.
Their widgets are very polished and professional. GXT and SmartGWT are fine
but they're too desktop-looky, not Web2.0 looky...
On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 4:03 PM, marius.andreiana marius.andrei...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Chi,
On Aug 9, 10:23 pm, Chi H c...@chi.ca wrote:
*
Vaadin looks good, and it makes sense to keep the client-side load
light, especially with touch devices becoming prevalent.
But it doesn't seem great (so far) for touch UI work, and I think the
everything in Java mantra is sub-optimal. While Vaadin has hooks for
CSS and hand-crafted JavaScript,
One thing that I have been doing lately is to *not* use the tab
panel. It's boring. Instead, I create my own tab bar, which I have
full css control of, and then a separate stack of widgets.
This lets me turn boring looking tabs into something really nice, much
like the tabs you find here:
Style is so subjective
I love GWT as-is, because it is plain, and CSS makes customization a
breeze
Has the GWT team thought about adding a theme section to there
website, similar to Firefox's addon page? A place where developers
could showcase custom themes. Other developers could
Worth to mention their debug mode where you can find design problems.
Try to click on the analyse layouts button:
http://demo.vaadin.com/sampler/?debug=true
so +1 for Vaadin
Marcelo Magno
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 1:17 PM, Steve Wart steve.w...@gmail.com wrote:
Vaadin looks good, and it
Hi Chris,
Here's a few that I really like :
- ActiveCollab
http://www.activecollab.com
- WordPress Admin
http://wordpress.org
- Vaadin widget library
http://demo.vaadin.com/sampler
Cheers
Olivier
On 6 Aug 2010, at 14:44, Chris Ramsdale wrote:
Hey GWT(ers),
I've heard from many of you
I'm glad to see the GWT Team taking more care of styling. Styling is
one of the reasons why we are currently using an external library like
GXT from Sencha to build our entreprise apps. I think GXT did a pretty
good job there.
On Aug 9, 10:17 am, Olivier oliv...@digiworks.es wrote:
Hi Chris,
While I appreciate the richness of widgets and behaviours offered by
framework like SmartGWT or GXT, I don't particularly like their
windowish look and feel, also I don't think it's a particularly good
idea promoting GWT powerfulness or web application in general by
mimicking desktop application
Thanks for all of the great feedback (and please, keep it coming). With
these suggestions and some internal guidance, we're going to move on to
fleshing out mocks. Once I have something tangible, I'll share it here.
-- Chris
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 8:01 PM, martino martino.piccin...@gmail.com
On the topic of the widget set.
* One thing we do internally is use deferred binding on some of our
custom widgets to deal with different browsers having different levels
of functionality. For example, in our custom styled button widget, we
use CSS3 properties (e.g.: border-radius) to render
Hi Chi,
On Aug 9, 10:23 pm, Chi H c...@chi.ca wrote:
* Pagination is the standard solution to the 'large number of
entities' problem. However, there is a usability cost to pagination.
It would be really nice to get rid of the pagination and just use a
scrollbar. If you used the approach
Stock GWT widgets look pretty basic. However they are easy to theme
because of their pure DOM structure and spartan CSS. They form a great
base to create highly unique non-boring looks. GXT (and SmartGWT ?)
has this rich and consistent enterprise look but is a pain in the arse
to customize and
It is crucial that the Look-and-Feel be documented as nimbus is (and
OpenLook was). Sure one can theme/style widgets to match at a low
level but CSS is insufficient to match scroll bars, navigation
controls, sort/filter controls, etc.
On Aug 6, 5:44 am, Chris Ramsdale cramsd...@google.com wrote:
I appreciate that Google is working on improving the UI. I understand
Chris asked for example business apps, like the expenses demo, but
since others are mentioning good looking widget libraries, I thought
I'd toss another in.
Vaadin has very nice looking widgets and their code is Apache 2
Hi,
I feel Google/GWT should not just an other fancy theme/skin, it should
support an abstract theming.
To offer just a concrete theme means your own widgets needs work
additional work to adapt to each concrete theme.
To offer an abstract theming facilities means easily to share concrete
themes.
On 8/6/10 2:44 PM, Chris Ramsdale wrote:
Hey GWT(ers),
I've heard from many of you that GWT apps simply don't look that good
out of the box, and styling the default app would go a long way. We
couldn't agree more. As some of you know, GWT 2.1 (with the help of
Spring Roo 1.1) will generate a
Hey GWT(ers),
I've heard from many of you that GWT apps simply don't look that good out of
the box, and styling the default app would go a long way. We couldn't agree
more. As some of you know, GWT 2.1 (with the help of Spring Roo 1.1) will
generate a full-fledged scaffolding app that users can
I think following a documented STD like nimbus would foster good looks
adoption. Thx for considering this!
On Aug 6, 8:44 am, Chris Ramsdale cramsd...@google.com wrote:
Hey GWT(ers),
I've heard from many of you that GWT apps simply don't look that good out of
the box, and styling the default
Try using system theme from GWT mosaic project. It make standar
application look MUCH better
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this
Take a look at the GXT(Ext GWT ) Style
i think it looks pretty good
2010/8/6 Roman Kuzmin ro...@softaria.com
Try using system theme from GWT mosaic project. It make standar
application look MUCH better
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web
I wish I could edit the row in-place (spreadsheet alike)
On Aug 6, 7:44 pm, Chris Ramsdale cramsd...@google.com wrote:
Hey GWT(ers),
I've heard from many of you that GWT apps simply don't look that good out of
the box, and styling the default app would go a long way. We couldn't agree
more.
You can use a widgets library on top of GWT, which can make your
application look good.
Here's what I listed the most/best used ones:
http://ui-programming.blogspot.com/2010/01/comparation-ext-gwt-gxt-vs-gwt-ext-vs.html
Cheers!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
ahh, good ol Sorinel C strikes again spamming us with links to his trojan
infecting ad-loaded site. He's a spammer in disguise. 90% of this posts have
links to his site.
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 2:15 PM, Sorinel C scristescu...@hotmail.com wrote:
You can use a widgets library on top of GWT,
+1 for working towards a Nimbus implementation
On Aug 6, 8:44 am, Chris Ramsdale cramsd...@google.com wrote:
Hey GWT(ers),
I've heard from many of you that GWT apps simply don't look that good out of
the box, and styling the default app would go a long way. We couldn't agree
more. As some of
The widgets in this showcase look nice with the Enterprise Blue or
Gray.
http://www.smartclient.com/smartgwt/showcase/
On Aug 6, 2:57 pm, dolcra...@gmail.com dolcra...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 for working towards a Nimbus implementation
On Aug 6, 8:44 am, Chris Ramsdale cramsd...@google.com
Hey GWT(ers),
I've heard from many of you that GWT apps simply don't look that good out of
the box, and styling the default app would go a long way. We couldn't agree
more. As some of you know, GWT 2.1 (with the help of Spring Roo 1.1) will
generate a full-fledged scaffolding app that users can
Google Adwords contains good looking business widgets (buttons,
dropdowns, wizards, etc). How about open-sourcing some of those?
On Aug 6, 2:44 pm, Chris Ramsdale cramsd...@google.com wrote:
Hey GWT(ers),
I've heard from many of you that GWT apps simply don't look that good out of
the box,
35 matches
Mail list logo
